The Mets are heading into 2027 with a Brett Baty problem they know all too well: what, exactly, should they make of him?
Baty came into the 2026 season with plenty of buzz. Fans and analysts expected a breakout, the kind of year that would finally match the former top-prospect billing. Instead, he delivered another season that left the Mets stuck in the same place they were a year ago.
Across 420 at-bats, Baty posted a .238/.311/.374 line with 11 home runs, 56 RBIs, a 91 wRC+ and 1.0 fWAR. Those numbers alone don’t tell the whole story, though.
He was inconsistent for much of the first half, then found his rhythm late. Over his final 40 games, Baty hit .303 with five home runs and a .926 OPS.
That late push looked awfully familiar. In 2025, he followed a slow start with a strong finish of his own, batting .305 with seven home runs and an .860 OPS over his final 40 games. So now the Mets are back at the same fork in the road: which version of Baty is the real one?
David Stearns doesn’t sound ready to lock in an answer. In his end-of-season comments, the Mets’ decision-maker said, "The truth is, we won't know."
"Having been around Brett for multiple years now, I think where he is from a mindset perspective, his level of belief in himself and how he works through an at-bat, is different right now. But as with any player, until you see it for an extended period, very difficult for me to sit here right now and have complete certainty on that," Stearns continued (h/t SNY.tv).
That’s the right kind of caution for the Mets to carry into the offseason. Baty’s strong finish matters, but it can’t erase the bigger body of work. New York can’t just hand him a starting job because he flashed for a couple of months.
There’s also another layer here: Baty has spent five seasons being moved around the diamond. He came up as a third baseman, struggled there at first, then put in the work to become a capable defender. But as holes popped up elsewhere, the Mets kept shifting him into different spots over the last two seasons.
For a player who turned 26 in August, that’s not a small ask. Trying to make real progress at the plate while also learning new positions is a tough assignment.
Still, that’s part of life in the majors. The job demands flexibility, and Baty has been asked to provide it.
The Mets’ best path with him in 2027 looks a lot like the one they used this season: let the bat earn the playing time.
Second base is the clearest opening. Stearns said the job will be filled internally, and the two main big-league options are Marcus Semien and Baty. Semien is expected to get the first shot, but if he struggles the way he did this season, Baty should be next in line for the bulk of the chances.
What happens from there could decide everything. If Baty responds, he could push himself into the everyday picture. If not, he may fit better in a bench role.
The Mets don’t need to give up on him after an uneven 2026. But they also can’t make the mistake of treating his late surge like proof that a breakout is guaranteed.
He’s earned more looks. He hasn’t earned a permanent job.
For Baty, 2027 might be the final chance to show he can still be part of the Mets’ long-term answer in the starting lineup.
In Other News...
Bo Bichette Could Force A Mets Infield Pivot Soon
Bo Bichettes looming opt-out could ripple beyond his own future and into the Mets infield planning before the decision even gets made. His versatility has kept him on the radar as a possible fit at third base, shortstop or second base, and that kind of flexibility matters for a team trying to map out what its next alignment might look like.
The market figure to be busy if Bichette reaches free agency, with the Angels, Braves and Orioles each mentioned as possible suitors for different reasons tied to roster need and recent performance. For the Mets, the bigger question is less about who else might want him and more about whether a move like that would force a pivot in how they picture their infield going forward. [Read more 🡒]
Mets Backup Plan To Tarik Skubal Comes With A Tough Price
Tarik Skubal sits near the top of any winter pitching wish list, and the Mets are part of the small group that could realistically chase him if he reaches the market. But as attractive as that kind of arm would be, the club also has to weigh the realities of free agency, where the price for the premier option can quickly spill into uncomfortable territory and force some difficult decisions about how aggressive to get.
Trevor Rogers is the cleaner fallback on paper, younger and coming off a recent stretch that makes him a legitimate rotation possibility, but the path to him is not simple either. If he rejects a qualifying offer, the Mets would be staring at draft-pick compensation penalties on top of the contract itself, which is exactly the kind of hidden cost that can shape how theyve handled pitching purchases in the past. The question is less whether Rogers can help than whether the Mets want to pay the extra price to find out. [Read more 🡒]
Mets Left Key Roster Questions Unanswered During Their Late-Season Tryout
After the trade deadline, the Mets essentially shifted into tryout mode, using the back half of the season to take a longer look at pieces that could matter down the road. With playoff stakes fading, the idea was clear enough: sort through the reshaped roster, gather information and start learning what the club might have for 2027. But even in that kind of evaluation window, some of the choices stood out for what the team did not explore.
Brett Baty never got the extended look at shortstop that might have clarified another possible path, while first base also went largely untested beyond the familiar options. Ronny Mauricio, meanwhile, got only limited major league time in September, which left another important developmental question hanging in the air. For a club that talked like it was using the season to investigate its future, the final month still left a few of the most practical roster questions unanswered. [Read more 🡒]