The Mets have two catchers drawing attention around the league, but Francisco Alvarez is the name that keeps pulling the conversation back to the same place: should they actually move him, or is this the kind of talent you keep and sort out later?
The Athletic’s Will Sammon recently pointed out that Alvarez and Luis Torrens could bring back a “bounty” because catching help is so hard to find. That alone tells you why the phone lines would be busy. It also explains why the Mets would have to think hard before doing anything drastic.
With Alvarez, the case for patience starts with the rest of the roster. The Mets already have enough turnover coming, and this offseason could bring real changes elsewhere.
Brett Baty and Mark Vientos are mentioned as players the team needs to cut bait with, and Ronny Mauricio is in that same group. Alvarez has been the exception among that Baby Mets core, which makes him a different kind of decision.
His numbers tell a mixed story. Alvarez is hitting .246/.310/.424 with 9 home runs and 19 RBI, and he also leads the league with 12 double plays grounded into.
He’s done most of his damage near the bottom of the lineup, and when the Mets push him higher, the production disappears. That’s part of why the debate exists in the first place.
There’s also the age and contract angle. Alvarez doesn’t turn 25 until November, and he’s controlled through the 2029 season.
He’s making $2.4 million this year, and the next jump is expected to land in the $4-5 million range. In a sport headed toward CBA uncertainty, that kind of affordable control matters.
That’s the argument for keeping him. The Mets have other holes to fill, and Alvarez’s trade value doesn’t sound like it’s at some peak that forces their hand.
The offers they’d get now may not disappear by winter. And if there’s still hope he can put it all together, why rush to break that?
But the other side of the argument is just as real: the Mets may not be able to keep waiting forever.
If another club comes with a huge offer, the kind that makes you stop and stare, New York would have to listen. The farm system doesn’t offer much else to move, and dealing Alvarez for prospects would be dangerous. Even so, the logic for moving him is simple enough: let another team take on the project and try to get back something more finished.
The trick is finding a return that actually helps. The Mets wouldn’t move Alvarez for a reliever.
The outfield is already covered, and most of the infield is spoken for. Bo Bichette opting out could open up third base, and a young player there would at least fit the conversation.
First base doesn’t make sense, especially not for a limited power bat with a ceiling like Ike Davis.
A starting pitcher is the one return that would really make the idea work. The problem is obvious: what team is willing to part with that kind of arm for a catcher? The best fit might come from a financially strapped club looking to move money early, and a win-now starter like Freddy Peralta with two years of control is the type of name that could push the Mets toward a deal.
In Other News...
Why Would The Mets Even Consider This NL East Trade Rumor
The National League East has a way of turning even routine roster chatter into something more urgent, and this latest bit of speculation fits that pattern. A CBS Sports writer floated a scenario in which the Mets would consider moving a pitcher who has been sidelined after taking a 110-plus mph line drive off his leg, a reminder that health and timing can reshape how front offices view a player almost overnight.
The wrinkle here is the business side as much as the injury. With a $12 million player option after the season in the mix, the Mets have to weigh whether holding on makes sense if the return could be limited, especially in a division where every edge matters. Nothing has been confirmed, but the rumor underscores how quickly a contender can be pushed to think about value, risk and what happens if it waits too long. [Read more 🡒]
One Forgotten Mets Deadline Move Looks Worse With The Dodgers
The Mets spent the 2024 trade deadline trying to fortify a roster that eventually pushed deep into October, and most of the attention naturally went to the bigger swings that helped shape that run against the Dodgers. But tucked inside the deadline shuffle was a smaller move that has aged a lot more awkwardly, especially now that Los Angeles is getting some useful innings from a pitcher New York once had in its system.
Paul Gervase has given the Dodgers a bullpen option they can keep leaning on, even if the results have come with the usual rookie volatility. He has shown enough swing-and-miss to matter, but also enough control trouble to keep the story from feeling finished, which is exactly the kind of detail that makes a modest deadline deal look different in hindsight. [Read more 🡒]
Mets Fans May Finally Embrace This Tyrone Taylor Trade Idea
If the Mets do decide Tyrone Taylor is movable, the return may not need to be flashy to make sense. Seattle has been sorting through its own outfield picture, and that kind of roster crunch can create openings for a deal built around depth and upside rather than a headline name. For New York, the appeal is obvious: Taylor is the sort of piece a contender can part with if it helps address another part of the roster, especially when the front office is looking for ways to keep the margins working in its favor.
The more interesting part is whether the Mets would use that kind of swap to bring in a pitcher who is close enough to matter soon, but still has some development left in the tank. With A.J. Minter and Brooks Raley no longer in the mix, there is at least a path for a left-handed arm to get a look, and Seattles system has one that has been moving through the upper levels with strong strikeout numbers and steady run prevention. The wrinkle is timing, because a pitcher in that spot can be useful to a club now, while also carrying enough roster pressure that the other side has to decide whether to hold on or make a move before the offseason changes the calculus. [Read more 🡒]