Mets Face A Risky Winter Call On Their Young Core

As the Mets face a pivotal offseason, long-term contract extensions for their young stars could redefine their financial strategy and roster stability.

David Stearns has plenty to sort through this winter, but one of the Mets’ trickiest decisions may not be about a trade or a free-agent splash. It’s whether to start locking up their young core now, or keep playing the waiting game.

The logic behind early extensions is easy to see. A player gets life-changing money before arbitration and free agency can squeeze the market.

A team gets budget control, avoids ugly salary battles, and can sometimes buy out a year or two of free agency. That model has become especially popular around the league, with the Braves making it a habit and young players such as Kevin McGonigle, Konnor Griffin and Cooper Pratt getting long-term deals early in their careers.

The Mets, though, have mostly stayed away from that approach. They haven’t extended a homegrown player before free agency since Jeff McNeil’s four-year deal. Billy Eppler did make Pete Alonso a seven-year offer worth more than $150 million, but Alonso turned it down.

Now Stearns has a group that fits the extension conversation. Carson Benge, A.J. Ewing, Nolan McLean and Christian Scott all sit in that window where a team can try to get ahead of the market.

For the Mets, the appeal is obvious. Benge and McLean, in particular, could become star-level players, and if that happens, their prices could climb fast once arbitration enters the picture.

The top end of that process gets expensive in a hurry. Juan Soto made $31 million in his final year of arbitration with the Yankees in 2024, and Tarik Skubal got $32 million this season.

That kind of escalation is exactly why teams like to strike early. It also helps a club like the Mets, where Steve Cohen has made it clear he does not want to keep paying the luxury tax forever. If Stearns believes players like Benge and McLean are going to be part of the roster into the early 2030s, a fixed number on their salaries would make future budgeting a lot cleaner.

But there’s another side to this, and the Mets know it well. Early extensions can look brilliant when they hit - Ronald Acuna Jr. is the poster child - but they can also go sideways fast. The Braves haven’t exactly gotten their money’s worth on Austin Riley’s 10-year, $212 million deal, and the Yankees moved on from Aaron Hicks’ seven-year, $70 million contract with more than two and a half years left on it in 2023.

The Mets might have already had some of these conversations if they had leaned harder into extensions before. Mark Vientos and Francisco Alvarez could have been candidates after their 2024 contributions. Instead, Vientos has fallen off badly enough to be a non-tender candidate this winter, while Alvarez has stalled because of injuries, defensive regression and inconsistent hitting approaches.

There’s also the bigger-picture issue hanging over all of this: the collective bargaining agreement. A possible salary cap would change the economic rules in a major way, and that makes timing everything. With Francisco Lindor and Juan Soto already on long-term deals, and the possibility of another major commitment to Skubal, Stearns has every reason to wait until the next financial setup is clear before adding more guarantees.

That doesn’t mean the Mets should ignore the idea forever. It just means the order matters. If the rules are about to change, it would be poor business to hand out a deal now that leaves the club squeezed later, especially if it meant overpaying someone like Ewing or Benge and then not having enough flexibility for McLean.

Once the uncertainty is gone, though, the case for acting early gets stronger. The Mets have leaned on a year-to-year approach because their spending power gives them the option to outbid the market when they need to keep someone.

That strategy has had mixed results. It worked in the winter of 2022 when they held onto Edwin Diaz and Brandon Nimmo, though Nimmo’s deal was still an overpay in years.

And once a player reaches the open market, the Mets lose control quickly - all it takes is one team to fall in love and push the price beyond what the Mets want to pay, as happened with Alonso in Baltimore last winter.

So the question isn’t really whether extensions make sense in a vacuum. They do.

It’s whether the Mets are ready to start using them as a real team-building tool again, instead of waiting until the market forces their hand. Once the CBA picture is settled, there’s a strong argument that they should.

In Other News...

Mets May Be Eyeing A Rotation Gamble They Know Too Well

The Mets are already thinking ahead to the post-2026 rotation picture, and it is easy to see why. Nolan McLean, Christian Scott and Zac Thornton give the organization some younger arms to work with, but a staff built around prospects usually still needs a veteran stabilizer, especially if the club wants to keep its window open and avoid leaning too hard on unproven depth.

One name that has surfaced is Tyler Mahle, whose recent performance makes him appealing on paper even as his injury history remains part of the conversation. For the Mets, the attraction is obvious, but so is the danger of chasing a pitcher whose availability has been a question before, which is why any serious push would need a credible backup plan if the Braves starter proves too risky to trust as the answer. [Read more 🡒]

Former Mets Arm Is Giving Fans A Trade Deadline Gut Check

The Mets long view this week stretches well beyond the standings, with one familiar arm offering a reminder of how quickly a roster decision can echo into October. Freddy Peralta, who was dealt from the Mets to the Tampa Bay Rays, spoke about the move and sounded content with the new role he has carved out in the ALDS, a tidy little gut check for anyone still wondering what might have been.

At the same time, the organizations future is still taking shape elsewhere, as prospect Cole Mathis is unveiling a new hitting stance in the Arizona Fall League. Between that development track and the broader postseason action, with the Dodgers beating the Braves and the Brewers topping the Padres, it is another snapshot of how one franchises present and future can overlap in a hurry. [Read more 🡒]

Mets Deadline Haul Already Features One Prospect Fans Will Obsess Over

The Mets did more than patch a roster at the trade deadline, they also added a crop of prospects who give the organization some real long-term intrigue. Among the names that landed in the system were Aidan Smith, Gabe Davis, Emilien Pitre, Billy Amick and Jefferson Rojas, a group that already gives the front office a few different developmental paths to watch as the minors fill out over the next few seasons.

Rojas stands out at the top of that list because the upside is easy to see, especially for a club that has been searching for young infield talent to keep moving forward. The evaluation around the group is less about immediate help than future value, but Rojas has emerged as the one to circle most closely, with a possible path to taking over at third base in 2027 if everything develops the way the Mets hope. [Read more 🡒]