The Mets’ Freddy Peralta gamble has gone sideways, but the way out might still run through Queens.
After sending Jett Williams and Brandon Sproat to Milwaukee to land the right-hander, the Mets have gotten almost nothing close to the impact they were expecting. Peralta’s first inning on Opening Day set the tone when he allowed a homer against the Pirates, and from there he never really settled in.
Now the focus has shifted to what happens next. With the trade deadline approaching, Peralta is expected to draw plenty of interest, and his contract situation is already pointing toward a busy winter. President of Baseball Operations David Stearns brought him in as a rental with just one year left on the deal, but the move has not played out the way anyone imagined.
Even so, there is still a path for the Mets and Peralta to stay connected beyond this season. The veteran right-hander has said more than once that he likes New York and that it was a place he wanted to be if he left Milwaukee. And after a rough year, there’s still a case that he could rebound in 2027.
That matters because the Mets are staring at a pitching puzzle next year. Clay Holmes’ status is uncertain, Peralta is headed toward free agency, and Sean Manaea’s role is still unclear. At the same time, the club does have three young arms in Nolan McLean, Christian Scott, and new sensation Zac Thornton, with Thornton making a real push for a spot.
A short-term return for Peralta could fit the picture. A one-year, prove-it type deal would give the Mets another arm without locking them into a long commitment, and it would give Peralta a chance to rebuild value in a place he already knows. His market is likely to look very different now than it did at the start of the season, and the Mets’ needs have changed too.
Peralta still has traits that will keep him attractive. His barrel percentage, xERA, xBA against, whiff rate, and average exit velocity all remain in the top 50th percentile in baseball, even if the overall picture is not what it was in past seasons. With a full offseason working alongside the Mets’ staff, there’s enough there to believe a bounce-back 2027 is possible.
The rotation picture also leaves room for another move. At minimum, two spots are open for 2027.
Thornton has put himself in the mix, but four starts are not enough to lock anything down. If he slips over the next two months, he could wind up being viewed more as depth than as a sure starter.
That is why a reunion could make sense for both sides. An incentive-heavy, two-year contract with a player option for year two would fit the kind of deal players in this situation often land. Peralta and his camp would lean on his overall track record, while teams would point to his 2026 season to push the price down.
However it plays out, the Mets are likely to be in the market for a short-term arrangement rather than a long-term commitment. If Peralta keeps sliding, that kind of deal would protect them from being stuck with an expensive mistake later. It would also fit the kind of contract structure Stearns tends to prefer.
In Other News...
Mets Just Gave A Top Young Arm A Bigger Test
Jonathan Santuccis rise through the Mets system has taken another step, with the left-hander moving up to Triple-A Syracuse after spending the season at Double-A. Ranked by MLB Pipeline as the organizations second-best prospect, Santucci has kept building his case with a mix of results and growth, putting together a 3.57 ERA while showing the kind of strikeout stuff that has made him one of the more intriguing arms in the pipeline.
The promotion gives the Mets a bigger stage to evaluate him against more advanced hitters, and it comes at a time when his recent work has started to look sharper. Santucci has been missing bats in bunches, including a season-high 13-strikeout outing and another start with double-digit punchouts, and his last stretch at Double-A suggested he was ready for the next challenge. If he keeps trending in that direction, he could start forcing a real conversation about where he fits in a future major league rotation. [Read more 🡒]
Mets May Finally Have A Way Out Of Sean Manaeas Contract
Sean Manaeas contract has become one of the more interesting roster questions hanging over the Mets this summer, and the reason is simple enough: he is expensive, the club has been looking for ways to create flexibility, and the rotation picture keeps evolving. Moving him would not just trim payroll, it would also open another lane for younger arms to push into the mix as the team keeps sorting out its next wave of starters.
The possibility is still only a rumor, but it has enough smoke to make the idea worth watching closely. Any deal would likely be driven more by the Mets desire to clear salary than by the kind of return that changes the organizations outlook, and that is the part that makes this situation feel unfinished. For now, it is less about a completed trade than about whether the Mets finally have a realistic path to getting out from under the contract. [Read more 🡒]
Mets May Have An Exit Path From Costly Jorge Polanco Gamble
Jorge Polanco was supposed to help stabilize first base for the Mets after arriving on a two-year, $40 million deal, but the move has not come close to paying off. Signed despite limited experience at the position and brought in as the replacement for Pete Alonso, Polanco has spent much of 2026 battling his body as much as opposing pitchers, opening with an Achilles issue and then landing on the injured list in mid-April with a wrist injury that wiped out nearly three months before his return before the All-Star break.
The bigger problem for the Mets is that the production has not followed the health. In 25 games, Polanco is hitting .149 with one home run and a .431 OPS, a line that makes any kind of midseason escape route complicated even before the contract is factored in. If the Mets are going to find a way out of the gamble, they may need a market willing to bet on a rebound rather than the player he has been so far. [Read more 🡒]