A year after making “run prevention” the guiding idea, David Stearns is scrapping the slogan.
That shift makes sense after the Mets stumbled to a 74-88 finish in 2026 and landed in last place in the NL East. Stearns’ plan for the roster clearly didn’t produce the kind of results the club wanted, and even he acknowledged as much during his season-ending press conference.
"In the first half, not well. I think I'll retire the phrase run prevention.
I don't know that that one wore particularly well," Stearns told reporters during the season-end press conference. "I think our pitching and defense were much better in the second half than they were in the first half."
There’s some room to argue how much of the defensive improvement actually came through, since injuries complicated the picture. New York also leaned on players who came with injury questions, and the replacements didn’t always hold up. In the end, the numbers never really looked dramatically better than they did in 2025.
Stearns was blunt about the process too, even if his wording sounded more spreadsheet than baseball clubhouse.
"We and I made a number of decisions that created the potential for an uncapped downside scenario"
David Stearns discusses the lessons he learned from the start to the 2026 season for the Mets pic.twitter.com/DUxoPG2KRM
- SNY Mets (@SNY_Mets) September 28, 2026
"We and I made a number of decisions that created the potential for an uncapped downside scenario," Stearns explained.
The message from there is pretty simple: the Mets need a new approach, and they need one that matches their resources. They do not have to hunt for cleverness the way smaller-payroll clubs do. They can afford to be direct, aggressive and efficient.
That means the smart play is obvious in some places. First base is one of the most power-dependent spots on the field, and the cleanest move there would be bringing back Pete Alonso rather than handing Jorge Polanco, an injury-prone player who was one year removed from a .213/.296/.355 line in 2024, $40 million over two years.
The same logic applies elsewhere. Instead of banking on several best-case outcomes to come together with the often-injured Luis Robert Jr. while also absorbing his $20 million salary, the better route would be to spend big on Cody Bellinger, who led MLB left fielders with 21 defensive runs saved despite missing 25 games because of injury.
Alonso and Bellinger would cost more, but the value they bring would also be higher. That is the kind of efficiency the Mets should be chasing.
This isn’t a new concern for Stearns, either. The broader issue has been his tendency to operate like he’s trying to prove he’s the smartest person in the room.
The Mets don’t need that. They need him to use the edge he already has and let the payroll work for him.
The assignment this winter is straightforward: get Steve Cohen to spend on stars, avoid overthinking the roster, and keep it simple.
In Other News...
Mets Face One Contract Question In Tarik Skubal Pursuit
Tarik Skubal is already shaping up to be one of the biggest names of the offseason, and the Mets appear to be right in the middle of the chase. New York and the Dodgers are reportedly viewed as two of the leading potential bidders for the pitcher, setting up a familiar kind of winter conflict for a club that is always willing to shop near the top of the market when impact talent becomes available.
For the Mets, though, the real question may not be whether they want in so much as what kind of offer they want to make. They may prefer a shorter contract, while the Dodgers are seen as more likely to go long, and that difference could matter as other clubs like the Yankees or Braves potentially join the bidding. However it plays out, the Mets' approach to Skubal will say plenty about how aggressively they want to attack this offseason. [Read more 🡒]
Freddy Peraltas Rise Will Leave Mets Fans Rethinking One Thing
Freddy Peralta has been one of the more interesting arms in Tampa Bays setup, and his Game 2 assignment against the Yankees only adds to the reminder of how well the Rays tend to get the most out of their pitchers. Peralta has openly credited pitching coach Kyle Snyder for helping shape his recent performance, pointing to the kind of communication and backing that can make a real difference when a pitcher is trying to settle into a new environment.
For Mets fans, the story carries an extra layer because it invites an uncomfortable comparison. Peraltas experience with Tampa Bay stands in contrast to what he found elsewhere, and it naturally raises questions about whether the Mets coaching approach and organizational fit have matched the needs of pitchers in the same way. Even without a tidy answer, the broader point is hard to miss: development is not just about talent, it is about whether the right people and the right message are in place. [Read more 🡒]
Jeremy Hefner Is Giving Mets Fans Another Painful Coaching Question
Ray Kerrs October emergence has become one of the more intriguing pitching subplots in the Braves playoff run. The left-hander has already started two postseason games and delivered six scoreless innings, turning what was once a limited big league track record into something far more useful for Atlanta at the biggest time of year. For a Braves staff that has leaned on stability all year, Kerr has fit the role almost immediately.
The Mets angle is impossible to miss because of the old Jeremy Hefner connection and the larger question of how much of this pitching growth traces back to his influence. After a season in which Kerr carried a 5.30 ERA and little experience, his turnaround has only sharpened the debate about Hefners imprint on pitchers who move on from New York. With Atlantas staff looking better from 2025 to 2026, Mets fans are left wondering what might have been, and whether the coach they trusted is now helping someone else reap the benefits. [Read more 🡒]
