Tarik Skubal sits alone at the top of this offseason’s pitching market, and that reality is already squeezing the Mets’ fallback options.
If New York misses on Skubal, Trevor Rogers looks like the kind of name that could surface quickly. The Mets tried to pry him away at the 2024 deadline and came up short, watching him go from the Miami Marlins to the Baltimore Orioles instead. His path since then has been a roller coaster: rough in Baltimore down the stretch, strong in a shortened 2025, and more ordinary in 2026 with enough flashes to keep clubs interested.
Rogers will turn 29 in November, and his current profile points toward a player trying to cash in now while still young enough to hit free agency again for a bigger payday later. Coming off a 10-11 season with a 4.01 ERA, he’s the sort of pitcher who can sell teams on what might be next rather than what’s already in the book.
That’s where the qualifying offer complicates everything for the Mets.
If Rogers gets one and turns it down, signing him means more than just adding another arm. It means surrendering draft-pick compensation again, plus international bonus slot money.
New York already took that hit last offseason when it signed Bo Bichette, losing $1 million in international bonus slot money along with its second and fifth highest draft picks. The same penalties would be waiting this winter if the Mets went down that road again.
For some players, that kind of price tag is easy to swallow. Juan Soto cost the Mets two picks and international bonus slot money, and nobody blinked. Bichette felt worth the hit in part because the Mets had already picked up a selection when Edwin Diaz departed.
Rogers is a different kind of decision. The source of the appeal is clear enough: his 101 ERA+ last season shows he was a shade better than league average, and the qualifying offer exists for exactly this sort of player - good, but not quite so good that he’s beyond the system’s reach.
Still, he’s expected to reject it, because he can lock in more money and more years of control. Health concerns only make that safer from his side.
He may not cost Skubal money, but he won’t be cheap. The expectation is that Rogers can land something in the neighborhood of $50 million over two years, with extra seasons attached.
That makes him a bet on what he could become, not just a reward for what he has already done. The comparison in the source is Zack Wheeler: not an ace in Queens, but good enough to make another team believe in the upside.
David Stearns has shown he’s willing to operate in that lane. Frankie Montas got $17 million for 2025 plus a player option for 2026, a deal that never sat well with fans.
Sean Manaea, Clay Holmes, and Pete Alonso all landed on short-term contracts with player options. Even Soto’s deal includes a way for the Mets to push back if he looks ready to leave.
That’s why Rogers fits so neatly into a Plan-B conversation. If Skubal slips away, the Mets could turn to him. The question is whether that backup plan is strong enough once the qualifying offer penalty gets added to the bill.
And that’s the wrinkle: Skubal, because he was traded midseason, would not cost the Mets anything beyond cash. Rogers would come with the extra baggage. That may be the difference between a name that makes sense and one the Mets decide is simply too expensive.
In Other News...
Bo Bichette Could Force A Mets Infield Pivot Soon
Bo Bichettes looming opt-out could ripple beyond his own future and into the Mets infield planning before the decision even gets made. His versatility has kept him on the radar as a possible fit at third base, shortstop or second base, and that kind of flexibility matters for a team trying to map out what its next alignment might look like.
The market figure to be busy if Bichette reaches free agency, with the Angels, Braves and Orioles each mentioned as possible suitors for different reasons tied to roster need and recent performance. For the Mets, the bigger question is less about who else might want him and more about whether a move like that would force a pivot in how they picture their infield going forward. [Read more 🡒]
Mets Left Key Roster Questions Unanswered During Their Late-Season Tryout
After the trade deadline, the Mets essentially shifted into tryout mode, using the back half of the season to take a longer look at pieces that could matter down the road. With playoff stakes fading, the idea was clear enough: sort through the reshaped roster, gather information and start learning what the club might have for 2027. But even in that kind of evaluation window, some of the choices stood out for what the team did not explore.
Brett Baty never got the extended look at shortstop that might have clarified another possible path, while first base also went largely untested beyond the familiar options. Ronny Mauricio, meanwhile, got only limited major league time in September, which left another important developmental question hanging in the air. For a club that talked like it was using the season to investigate its future, the final month still left a few of the most practical roster questions unanswered. [Read more 🡒]
Mets Face The Same Brett Baty Question All Over Again
Brett Batys 2026 season was a familiar Mets mix of promise and frustration, a slow start giving way to a better second half without fully settling the long-running question around his place on the roster. There were signs of progress, enough to keep the organization interested, but not enough to make his role feel locked in going forward.
David Stearns acknowledged the uncertainty around what comes next for Baty, and that leaves the Mets heading into 2027 with more evaluation ahead rather than a clear answer. His path could include more time at second base, depending on how other players perform, which means Baty is again in the kind of spot where opportunity is available but nothing is guaranteed. [Read more 🡒]