Freddy Peralta is back on the mound tonight with the chance to send his team to the World Series, and the setting only sharpens the uncomfortable lesson for the New York Mets. That start will come in Tampa Bay, where the Rays are trying to finish off the Cleveland Guardians in the ALCS.
For the Mets, Peralta was supposed to be a centerpiece. They brought him in as the ace in David Stearns’ latest attempt to build a rotation, and the reasoning made plenty of sense.
Stearns knew Peralta well from Milwaukee, where he had been acquired and developed before growing into an ace over the last few years. The price also looked manageable: prospects Brandon Sproat and Jett Williams.
It never clicked in New York. Peralta went 5-9 with a 4.99 ERA and 1.48 WHIP in 22 starts, and once the Mets fell out of contention, Stearns shipped him to Tampa Bay at the deadline for a package of prospects led by infielder Emilien Pitre.
That deal has looked a lot better for the Rays. Peralta has taken off since the move, going 5-2 with a 3.25 ERA and 1.01 WHIP in 10 starts. He’s also been one of Tampa Bay’s best postseason arms, trailing only Drew Rasmussen in the pecking order while posting a 0.79 ERA and striking out nine in 11.1 innings.
On Monday, ESPN’s Jorge Castillo dug into what changed after the trade, and the details point straight back to the Mets. Rays bullpen coach Jorge Moncada said Tampa Bay took Peralta back to what worked for him in Milwaukee, which suggested the problem wasn’t the pitcher so much as the way New York was using him.
After a rough first outing with the Rays in Colorado, Peralta settled in and looked far more like himself. Castillo reported that Tampa Bay wanted him to pitch out of the stretch more often, just as he had done in Milwaukee.
New York had him working through a full windup early in the season, and Rays officials believed that was hurting his effectiveness.
The adjustments didn’t stop there. Tampa Bay also moved Peralta to the third-base side of the pitching rubber, widened his stance, put him on a new workout plan to strengthen his legs, and sped up his delivery.
The Rays also pushed him to throw more changeups, giving him a better contrast to pair with his elite fastball. In the end, Tampa Bay got more of the Brewers version of Peralta than the Mets ever did.
Mets officials told MLB.com’s Anthony DiComo that several of those mechanical ideas were adjustments they felt could maximize Peralta’s effectiveness. Stearns also addressed the situation in his end-of-season press conference, saying he needed to look more closely at why the Mets couldn’t communicate the changes to Peralta the way the Rays did.
That’s the part the Mets have to sit with. Even if they had the right ideas, they still didn’t get the same buy-in. Peralta has been open about how supportive the Rays’ environment is for pitchers, and that does not reflect well on a Mets club trying to build a reputation for fixing arms.
The Castillo story also raises a simple question: why did the Mets stick with the full windup for so long when it was clearly affecting Peralta? New York has at times looked rigid in how it pushes information and process, and forcing a major change on a pitcher who wasn’t thriving under it may have made him less willing to embrace the rest.
Messaging may have been part of the issue, and that’s one area where new manager Andy Green has drawn positive attention. Several young players who struggled early under Carlos Mendoza improved after Green took over, including Nolan McLean and Christian Scott. That makes it fair to wonder whether stronger communication could help keep a similar situation from happening again.
The bigger takeaway is hard to miss: the Mets are not above getting it wrong with their own players. Peralta’s praise for the Rays, and the results that followed in Tampa Bay, should hit as a warning that flexibility matters - especially when a new acquisition is trying to find his footing.
In Other News...
Mets Quietly Look Better And Better After This Bullpen Trade
Huascar Brazobn had quietly become a useful piece for the Mets after arriving in 2024, giving the bullpen a dependable arm who could handle different roles and take on meaningful innings. Even after a strong first half in 2026, the Mets decided to move him at the deadline, a decision that looked like a standard bullpen shuffle at the time.
Since going to the White Sox, Brazobns results have trended the wrong way, with a higher ERA and a stint on the injured list. Meanwhile, the return is beginning to look more interesting for New York, as prospects Gabe Davis and Zach Franklin have each flashed promise in the minors and given the front office a little more reason to feel good about the trades long-term value. [Read more 🡒]
Mets Suddenly Have A Tough Call On One Departed Depth Piece
MJ Melendez and Vidal Brujan have both elected free agency after the season, leaving the Mets to weigh whether either depth piece still fits into the picture going forward. Melendez got a brief look in the majors but never really got going with the club, while both players spent time in Triple-A and turned in stronger stretches there than they did on the big league stage.
The question now is whether the Mets want to circle back on either player at all, and the answer may be different for each. Brujan does not appear to fill an obvious current need, but Melendez could still be viewed as a possible minor league depth option if the organization wants to keep some familiar coverage in the system. Either way, their futures with the team are unsettled. [Read more 🡒]
Mets Prospects Are Already Creating One Early AFL Debate
The Arizona Fall League season is still young, but the Mets are already getting a better look at how their prospects are fitting into the mix with Surprise. Over the first stretch of games from Oct. 11 through Oct. 17, the clubs group showed up across the box scores, with hitters like Cole Mathis, Boston Baro and Bruin Agbayani collecting opportunities while arms such as Brendan Girton, Calvin Ziegler, Ryan Lambert, Irving Cota and Peyton Prescott got early work in a developmental setting that is supposed to test them as much as showcase them.
Even in a week interrupted by postponed games because of inclement weather and power issues, there has been enough action to spark one familiar fall discussion for Mets observers: which of these young players is making the strongest early impression, and who still needs more runway. The numbers and usage from the opening week have given the organization a useful snapshot, but the broader question of who is truly separating themselves is still very much open as the AFL schedule settles in. [Read more 🡒]