David Stearns spent Monday doing something he can’t really afford to do often: sitting in the wreckage and saying it out loud.
The Mets’ president of baseball operations didn’t dodge the obvious after a season that went off the rails. He admitted the decisions he made last offseason helped create the disaster, and he made clear there won’t be any time machine coming to save him.
“We and I made a number of decisions that created the potential for almost an uncapped downside scenario,” he said at his Citi Field postmortem. “I think we try to learn from everything, and I think the entire offseason last year was a learning experience for me.”
Stearns has never come off like a man who wears his emotions on his sleeve. His delivery is calm, his answers are precise, and that can make it easy to mistake restraint for detachment. But Monday was different in one important way: he spent more than a half-hour owning the failures and sketching out what has to change.
“[What we] experienced this past weekend, what we just experienced in Washington, where you are literally playing out the string - it’s miserable,” he said. “That’s a miserable experience for players, for coaches, for executives. So I think we have an extraordinarily motivated organization from ownership on down to ensure that never happens again.”
The fixes he outlined were direct. The Mets need more from first and second base.
They plan to add to the top of the rotation. He wants more flexibility on the roster.
And while the organization still wants to build around a strong prospect pipeline, Stearns made it clear there will also be big swings.
“There are going to be selective, very aggressive pursuits [in free agency]. We have complete ownership support.”
One of the more interesting parts of his remarks was Stearns acknowledging something that has long been part of the Mets conversation: not every player is built to handle New York. He said his thinking has changed after seeing how players react when they arrive and when they leave.
“I think [my opinion has changed], yes,” he said. “When you live it and you see player reactions, both when they come here and when they leave here and you hear them talk about some of the differences that they experience here - I do think it’s important to have players here that lean into that and that enjoy it, because it’s unlike anywhere else.”
He followed that with the kind of blunt line that explains why the market can be so unforgiving here.
“When you win here, it’s the greatest thing in the world . . . It’s equally extreme when things aren’t going well, and I do think certain players struggle with that.”
That pressure lands on executives too, and no one on the Mets feels it more than Stearns. The decision not to re-sign Pete Alonso last offseason is the kind of move that can linger for the rest of his run. And even though he grew up a Mets fan, the same question now hangs over him that he’s asking about the players he wants to bring in: can he handle this place?
The answer is still being written. But Stearns does seem to understand the categories now: the people who can thrive in this chaos, the people who can’t, and the ones who figure it out.
This past offseason produced all three. Luke Weaver fit the first group.
Freddy Peralta landed in the second. Bo Bichette started getting buried by boos and still clawed his way out of it.
That third path is the hardest one. Once the failures pile up and the noise starts getting louder, it gets into your head. And then it can start feeding the next mistake.
That’s the road Stearns has to navigate now if he’s going to repair this thing.
The offseason he just went through was supposed to be difficult. The next one looks even worse.
The free-agent class is thin outside a few standouts. A looming lockout could cut into the 2027 season, and a new collective bargaining agreement is expected to reshape the way teams operate.
All of that is coming while the Mets sit in the aftermath of a season that left the organization, in Stearns’ own words, smelling like failure.
Still, Monday offered a reason to believe there’s at least some self-awareness here. Stearns was direct, and he sounded intent on correcting the blind spots that helped get the Mets into this mess. The club also has continuity with Andy Green in place as manager, and the younger players Stearns brought in give next year’s roster some real intrigue.
“The disappointment of our season is very true and real,” he said. “We, as an organization, feel that.
Our fan base feels that. There’s no denying any of that.
There is also the real foundation here for the level of success and competitiveness that we expect to have.”
He can’t undo what happened. He can only try to make sure the next round of decisions doesn’t send the Mets right back here. Whether he becomes the right person to pull that off will depend on what he does with the failure he’s already earned.
In Other News...
Mets Trade Deadline Debate Just Took A Surprising Turn
The summer trade deadline once looked like it might define the Mets postseason outlook from afar, with several familiar names landing elsewhere and immediately being tied to October expectations. Instead, the playoff picture has thinned quickly for those new clubs, and the impact from a number of those Mets-dealt players has been limited or nonexistent, changing the way those moves are being judged in hindsight.
Only Freddy Peralta of the Tampa Bay Rays remains active in the postseason mix, while others such as Clay Holmes, Tyrone Taylor and David Peterson have barely surfaced in playoff action. For the Mets, that shift matters because deadline deals are always measured by more than return value in July, and this one is now being viewed through a very different October lens. [Read more 🡒]
One Of The Strangest Mets Pitching Feats Still Stands Alone
Rob Gardners afternoon on Oct. 2, 1965, still sits in a class of its own in Mets history. In a 0-0 tie against the Phillies, the left-hander kept going deep into extra innings and wound up throwing 15 innings, a workload that became one of the strangest official pitching lines in the franchises early years.
The game itself was replayed the next day and did not count in the standings, but Gardners individual numbers from that day still do. More than six decades later, his 15-inning outing remains the Mets record, untouched by every starter and reliever who has followed. [Read more 🡒]
Mets History Has One No-Hit Pattern Fans Will Want To Argue Over
The Mets have lived through their share of pitching misery over the years, but one strange wrinkle stands out in the clubs no-hit history: four of the eight no-hitters thrown against them came during doubleheader games. It is the sort of odd footnote that baseball history produces once in a while, and for a franchise that has seen everything from heartbreak to rare moments of perfection, it adds another layer to a long-running ledger of tough afternoons and memorable pitching performances.
Jim Bunnings perfect game in 1964 and Max Scherzers no-hitter in 2015 sit near the top of that list for very different reasons, and the outcomes around those games were not always the same from one side of a twin bill to the next. Some of those Mets doubleheader no-hit games ended in losses, others in wins, which is part of what makes the pattern worth arguing about. It is not just a trivia quirk, either - it is a reminder that with this team, even the most brutal history often comes with a twist. [Read more 🡒]