The National League Rookie of the Year race feels like it’s narrowing fast, and the names at the center of it are Carson Benge and Sal Stewart. That leaves the Mets and Reds once again linked in a rookie debate, with one New York first-year player or one Cincinnati freshman likely taking the award.
It’s not a simple comparison. Benge stands out as the more complete player, and there’s a built-in argument for him if voters want to reward the fact that he didn’t appear in the majors before 2026. He also barely got any Triple-A run the year before, which only adds to the unusual shape of his rise.
Stewart’s case looks different. His offensive line is the more familiar kind of Rookie of the Year resume, the sort built on production that jumps off the page.
He finished with 32 home runs and 111 RBI, numbers that sat among the league’s best. And while .263 may not sound overwhelming, in today’s game it plays like a much stronger batting average.
For Mets and Reds fans who’ve seen this movie before, the matchup has an old-school feel. The last time those two clubs were tied together in a Rookie of the Year fight came all the way back in 1968, when the award came down to a razor-thin two-man race.
That season was “The Year of the Pitcher,” with Denny McLain winning the AL MVP and Bob Gibson claiming the NL MVP. Pitching ruled the sport, and that backdrop may have helped shape the way voters viewed a Mets rookie who had every reason to feel slighted.
Back then, voters didn’t rank a long list of candidates the way they do now. They picked one.
In this case, one voter split his vote, and that tiny wrinkle mattered. Reds rookie and future Hall of Famer Johnny Bench ended up with 10.5 first-place votes, while Mets pitcher Jerry Koosman finished with 9.5.
There was no recount, even if Koosman had a legitimate argument.
Bench put together a strong offensive season in a year when offense was hard to find, batting .275/.311/.433 and winning his first Gold Glove. Koosman, meanwhile, went 19-12 with a 2.08 ERA.
By today’s standards, a 6 bWAR season for Koosman and a 5 bWAR season for Bench might have pushed the conversation in a different direction. But WAR wasn’t part of the discussion then, and the whole thing ended up feeling like a curve-adjusted judgment call.
Koosman’s problem was that Gibson was running away with the NL Cy Young, which left the Mets rookie without much room to climb in the pitcher conversation. He did receive 14 points in the NL MVP race, with Bench just behind at 11.
That raises the same old question: were voters separating MVP and Rookie of the Year, or blending them together in their heads? In 1968, they were not exactly easy to untangle.
Among pitchers, Koosman’s MVP finish trailed only Gibson and Juan Marichal. He was tied for a distant 13th overall, but it still stood as a major season and one of the best individual efforts in Mets history.
That’s what makes the Benge-Stewart race feel familiar, even if the comparison is cleaner this time. It’s not pitcher versus hitter in a year when the league is tilted one way or the other.
It’s two rookies with different strengths, both with real cases, and both with a path to being the one left standing. And unlike 1968, there isn’t even a playoff resume to settle things, since neither the Mets nor the Reds made the postseason.
In Other News...
Braves First Offseason Move Involves A Former Mets Depth Piece
The Braves have started their offseason by bringing back a familiar utility name, agreeing to a minor league contract with Vidal Brujan. For Mets fans, it is a reminder of a player who passed through Queens briefly in 2026 after first being in Atlantas system in 2025, the kind of depth move that rarely changes a roster but can still matter when a team is trying to build out its bench and Triple-A options.
Brujan has carved out a reputation as a versatile defender more than an established major league bat, which is why his market has tended to live in the margins of the offseason. After his stint with the Mets, he chose free agency, and Atlanta now gets another look at a player it already knows well. The move does not carry much headline weight on its own, but it fits the sort of low-risk churn that often fills out the first weeks of winter. [Read more 🡒]
Mets May Be Eyeing A Rotation Fix They Still Can't Rely On
Pitching depth is once again part of the Mets offseason conversation, and Dustin May has emerged as one of the more intriguing names on the board. The right-hander declined his $20 million mutual option with the Brewers and is now a free agent, giving clubs a chance to weigh his upside against the uneven stretch he just put together. He began the 2026 season with the Cardinals before being dealt to Milwaukee, where his results became more uneven as the year went on.
For the Mets, the appeal is obvious enough. They need arms, and May could fit as either a middle-of-the-rotation starter or a long reliever on a one-year deal. The question is whether a team looking for stability wants to bet on a pitcher whose season included real flashes but also plenty of late-year uncertainty, especially after his struggles in the second half and postseason. [Read more 🡒]
Mets Fans Can Dream On Another NPB Bat But One Problem Looms
After the season, David Stearns reportedly made the trip to Japan to get a closer look at Teruaki Sato, a sign the Mets are at least doing their homework on one of the more intriguing bats overseas. Sato just finished a triple-crown campaign in NPB, which is enough to put him on the radar for any club looking to add impact offense, and it is easy to see why he would appeal as an offseason target.
The fit, though, is not quite as simple as the production line suggests. Satos strikeout rate is a real concern, and the Mets also have some roster congestion to think about, with Bo Bichette and Carson Benge already occupying key spots. So while the idea of another NPB bat will keep fans dreaming, the front office still has to figure out whether the player and the puzzle pieces line up cleanly enough to make the move worthwhile. [Read more 🡒]