Rich Paul isn’t buying the idea that James Dolan and the Knicks bungled their offseason by letting Mitchell Robinson go.
That debate has been simmering ever since New York’s championship run, with the franchise’s owner taking heat for drawing a hard line against the second tax apron. The Knicks made it clear they were going to do whatever it took to stay out of that territory, and the cost of that approach was a roster sacrifice that didn’t sit well with plenty of fans.
The loudest criticism came from Max Kellerman on a recent episode of the “ Game Over ” podcast. He went after Dolan’s approach to team spending and framed the issue in blunt terms:
“There’s one of two options here if you own [a team], especially the New York Knicks. If $50-$90 million in tax money is too much for you to pay, even though the equity of the team is shooting through the roof, even though it’s in the black every year, then one of two things: Either you are too poor to own the team, i.e., sell the team, or, since we know that’s not the case with Dolan, you’re selfish, cheap, and greedy.”
But Paul, the Klutch Sports Group CEO, pushed back hard. He argued that the Knicks’ decision has to be viewed through the lens of Robinson’s overall value, not just the emotion around losing him. Paul said:
“Let me say this. I disagree, Max, and I think you’re misreading the thing with Dolan and the Knicks.
Let’s look at it from the other side of the coin. If you evaluate the season, if you evaluate the player, if you evaluate the impact, his offensive rebounding and things like that.
But at the same time, if the team goes into the penalty, whenever that is, that he’s in the game, that changes the game because you’re going into the Hack-a-Mitchell situation.”
Paul’s point was straightforward: Robinson helps in the areas that matter, but his free-throw issues can become a problem in the wrong moments. That, in Paul’s view, changes how much a team should be willing to pay.
He doubled down from there:
“It doesn’t matter… You’re basically telling me to go into the second apron for a role player who plays a role for this many minutes in only this part of a game. I may not want to do that. I may not need to do that and still be successful, because you’ve got to look at it holistically.”
Paul’s comments also seemed to shrink Robinson’s standing a bit, even while crediting him for what he brought to the Knicks. He referred to him as a “backup big man,” which Kellerman pushed back on by pointing to Boston’s interest in the center and the fact that the Celtics signed him to a three-year, $47.4 million deal.
That contract, at the very least, suggests Boston saw more value in Robinson than a mere situational piece.
Still, Paul kept defending Dolan’s stance, saying the only players worth crossing into the second apron for would have been Jalen Brunson, Karl-Anthony Towns, OG Anunoby, Josh Hart, and Mikal Bridges.
There is a case for that view on paper. Robinson’s regular-season line of 5.7 points, 8.8 rebounds, 0.9 steals, and 1.2 blocks doesn’t jump off the page, even if his playoff impact was real. Add in the recurring injury concerns around him, and the Knicks’ caution becomes easier to understand.
For now, the public read is that Robinson’s exit came down to New York’s refusal to push into the second tax apron. But a cryptic comment from the big man hints that there may be more behind the move than the cap sheet alone.
In Other News...
Knicks Reward Landry Shamet With Long Term Deal After Title Run
Landry Shamets value to the Knicks went well beyond the box score during their championship run, where he gave them needed shooting and steady defense at exactly the right time. His best stretch came in the Eastern Conference Finals, when he helped stabilize the rotation and fit neatly into a team that leaned on versatility and timely shot-making all spring.
Now the Knicks have made sure that contribution is part of their longer-term plan. Shamet agreed to a four-year, $24 million contract that gives New York some security without fully locking in every season, and team president Leon Rose made clear the organization views him as more than a short-term piece after the way he helped push the club to the title. [Read more 🡒]
Knicks Fans Just Learned How Much Brunson Was Really Dealing With
Jalen Brunson is headed for offseason surgery on his left wrist, a move the Knicks have been able to put off until now because of how deep their run went. The procedure is expected to keep him on the shelf for about two months, but the bigger point for New York is that the team is finally addressing an issue that had been hanging over its star guard as it pushed through the spring.
Brunson is expected to be ready by the start of next season, which matters as much as anything for a Knicks team built around his availability and steadiness. The surgery is meant to prevent the wrist from getting worse and to protect his long-term health, leaving the organization with a brief offseason concern but no reason to believe its centerpiece will miss opening night. [Read more 🡒]
Knicks May Already Regret This Cost Cutting Draft Decision
The Knicks spent draft night looking for savings, trading back in the 2026 NBA draft to trim rookie costs before bringing back Jose Alvarado and Landry Shamet. On paper, it was a tidy bit of roster management, the kind of move that helps a team preserve flexibility while filling out the back end of the rotation. But the cost-cutting approach also meant passing on a couple of intriguing young players who fit obvious needs for a team trying to balance win-now depth with a little long-term upside.
Cameron Carr and St. John's Zuby Ejiofor have both looked the part early in Summer League, which only sharpens the question of what the Knicks gave up by moving back. New Yorks veteran-heavy roster already leaves little room for developmental mistakes, and the ripple effects of that draft-night decision could reach beyond this summer if the team keeps trying to squeeze in more proven pieces around the edges. [Read more 🡒]