Victor Wembanyama’s new deal with the Spurs has become more than just a contract story. It has turned into the latest flashpoint in the league’s ongoing fight over the NBA’s tax system, with the Knicks’ 2026 championship sitting at the center of the conversation.
After New York’s Finals run and San Antonio’s loss, Wembanyama agreed to a five-year, $252 million rookie-scale extension to stay with the Spurs. He chose the 25 percent max instead of the 30 percent supermax escalators that would have pushed the deal to $303 million. The logic behind that choice was straightforward: help San Antonio maintain financial flexibility over the next few years as it tries to work around the CBA’s tax aprons and build a roster capable of making a real postseason push.
If the Spurs had won it all, the situation might have looked very different. There’s a real chance Wembanyama would not have been as willing to leave money on the table after helping deliver a title in just his third season. He has not yet made the kind of money that would make a discount feel automatic, so a championship could easily have changed the calculation.
Instead, the Knicks’ title helped shine a light on what San Antonio still needs to do. And with that, Wembanyama’s decision has become a symbol of a bigger issue: players being asked to sacrifice financially so teams can keep their cores intact.
That is exactly the part the NBPA doesn’t like.
In an ESPN piece by Ben Golliver, NBPA executive director David Kelly made his frustration plain. He said, "we are not fans of the second apron" and argued that players should not be "in the position to carry the burden of keeping a team together."
Kelly’s comments came in response to questions about Wembanyama’s choice to take less than the supermax. He also said that "players should make decisions for themselves and we should not be ... pocket-watching."
Wembanyama’s deal is only the latest move this summer shaped by the league’s financial rules. The offseason has already seen major decisions influenced by the tax system, from the Jaylen Brown blockbuster to, sadly, Mitchell Robinson’s departure from the Knicks to Boston.
But because of Wembanyama’s profile, his contract has become the one drawing the loudest reaction. Kelly went so far as to say the second apron needs to be either "softened" or removed altogether.
And that is why the Knicks’ championship may have done more than end a 53-year title drought. It may have pushed the second apron debate into overdrive once and for all.
In Other News...
Knicks Center Battle Suddenly Feels Worse For Karl-Anthony Towns
The Knicks first week of Summer League has not done much to settle the center picture. After opening with two losses, including a 70-49 defeat to the Spurs, the groups most obvious depth candidate has had a rough go of it. Liam Robbins, the seven-foot center trying to carve out a place in the rotation conversation, has flashed very little so far, with limited production and the kind of uneven play that leaves more questions than answers.
Robbins has been struggling to make a clean case for himself in Las Vegas, and the numbers reflect it. Through two games, he has averaged 2.0 points and 3.0 rebounds while battling poor shooting and turnovers, a shaky start for a player whose size should at least give him a path to relevance. For a Knicks team still sorting out its big-man hierarchy, his next chance to steady things matters, because every missed opportunity makes the competition look a little less like a battle and a little more like a warning sign. [Read more 🡒]
Knicks May Have Pulled Off A Quiet Free Agency Steal With Shamet
The Knicks kept Landry Shamet around because they value exactly what he brings: shooting, spacing and a steady hand in a playoff rotation. For a team built around its core, having a guard who can slide into a role without demanding the ball is useful, and New York clearly sees Shamet as one of those lower-profile pieces that can still swing meaningful minutes when the games tighten up.
What makes the move stand out is the price. Shamets four-year, fully guaranteed deal comes in at $14.3 million, a number that looks especially sharp for a player whose production and efficiency held up well last season. In a market where reliable shooting can get expensive fast, the Knicks may have found a cost-effective fit who gives them exactly the kind of depth contenders usually have to pay more to get. [Read more 🡒]