You can point to the second apron all you want, and James Dolan’s stubbornness has clearly shaped this whole mess. But that’s not the entire story behind Karl-Anthony Towns and the Knicks.
The bigger issue is simpler and a lot colder: New York does not want to be the team that hands out a giant contract to a star over 30 and spends the next few years regretting it.
That’s why the Knicks have reportedly stayed in the $45 million to $50 million per year range. It’s not just about dodging the second apron and whatever damage comes with it. It also signals that the front office is looking hard at how ugly some of these superstar deals have become once players get deeper into their 30s.
The list is not comforting. Players aged 30 or older making more than $45 million this season include Stephen Curry, Nikola Jokic, Giannis, Antetokounmpo, Anthony Davis, Joel Embiid, Jaylen Brown, Devin Booker, Jimmy Butler, Paul George, Kawhi Leonard, Donovan Mitchell, Zach LaVine, Pascal Siakam, Domantas Sabonis, and Towns himself.
And even among that group, the number of deals with real trade value is small. Jokic, Curry, Giannis, Siakam, and Towns fit that description.
Kawhi can be argued into the group, though he’s already injured. Brown has a case too, but Boston just moved him for what can only be called a modest return.
Mitchell would have been in that category a little while ago. Then he signed a four-year, $276 million extension that is already viewed as one of the league’s hardest contracts to move.
The Knicks know not every player ages the same way. Towns’ shooting should age better than a lot of skills, and his floor-spacing still matters.
But he also plays the league’s most physical position, and teams are increasingly wary of carrying two near-max stars at once, no matter how old they are. The Celtics are the obvious example.
And if we’re being blunt, even some of the biggest names in the league would be tough sells on certain deals. Curry’s two-year, $116 million extension might scare off plenty of teams.
Giannis can sign a four-year, $276 million deal beginning January 6, and that would be a massive commitment too. Jokic is lined up for a five-year, $357.3 million max contract over the 2027 offseason, and that’s the kind of number that changes a franchise’s entire future.
There’s also a separate truth here: the Knicks might not have changed their stance even if the second apron didn’t exist. The reality is this front office is always thinking a year or two ahead, not just about the immediate fix.
In the short term, paying Towns whatever it takes and sorting out the rest later would make sense. He is a superstar, and that part isn’t going anywhere in the next year or two.
But beyond that, New York has no guarantees.
A four-year deal would tie the Knicks to Towns through his age-35 season, and the pool of players that age who are still worth the kind of money New York has reportedly offered is very small. Unless you want to make the case for Kawhi or Kevin Durant, the only clear example is Curry.
So this standoff is about more than apron rules and more than ownership quirks. It’s about the Knicks trying to avoid the kind of back-end disaster that can sink a contract once the shine wears off.
They’re not trying to shortchange Towns. They’re trying to protect themselves from what that deal could look like when it gets old.
In Other News...
James Dolan May Be Standing In The Knicks' Way Again
Karl-Anthony Towns irritation over not having a contract extension appears to be aimed less at the Knicks basketball operations staff than at owner James Dolan, according to James L. Edwards III of The Athletic. The backdrop here is straightforward enough: New York has been working through the realities of a pricey roster, and the extension conversation has become part of that larger picture as the team tries to balance present ambition with future flexibility.
Dolans reluctance to push the Knicks into the NBAs second salary cap apron has added another layer to the discussion, with the concern centered on roster-building restrictions rather than simple spending. The Athletic piece lays out how those second-apron rules can limit what a team can do, while also noting that New York is already living with some of those constraints because of its current salary situation, which makes the extension question feel less like a routine negotiation and more like a test of how far the franchise is willing to go. [Read more 🡒]
Knicks Keep Finding Bargains And Jordan Clarkson Is Proving Why
The Knicks have made a habit of squeezing real value out of the margins, and Jordan Clarkson is the latest example. On a veterans minimum deal, he has been one of their most productive players this season and has even led the team in plus/minus through its first nine games, a reminder that bargain contracts can carry real weight when the roster is built the right way.
Landry Shamet offered a similar blueprint last season, arriving on a non-guaranteed deal before turning that opportunity into a multi-year contract after helping in the playoffs. In a salary cap era where every usable rotation piece matters, New York has shown it can uncover players who outperform the price tag, and Clarkson is giving that approach another boost. [Read more 🡒]
Mikal Bridges Is Testing Knicks Patience At The Worst Time
Mikal Bridges has not looked like the steady two-way wing the Knicks expected through the first stretch of the season, and the numbers tell the story. Through nine games, he has been limited to 6.6 points, 3.2 rebounds and 2.2 assists per game while shooting 32.9 percent from the field, a rough opening for a player New York was counting on to help stabilize the rotation.
Mike Brown has already benched Bridges three times, a sharper response than last season and a sign the staff is willing to keep searching for answers. Landry Shamet and Jordan Clarkson have picked up some of those minutes, but Bridges track record in big playoff moments still hangs over the situation, leaving the Knicks to weigh patience against the pressure of needing better production now. [Read more 🡒]
