The Knicks’ summer center audition is already looking shaky.
New York’s 70-49 loss to the Spurs on Saturday dropped the club to 0-2 to open the Las Vegas portion of the 2026 NBA Summer League, and the results haven’t done much to calm the questions around the back end of the roster. Fans have been watching the young group closely, but the spotlight has landed hard on Liam Robbins.
Robbins, the former SEC Defensive Player of the Year, earned this Summer League chance after spending the 2025-26 season with the NBA G League’s Rip City Remix. With backup center Mitchell Robinson now with the Celtics, Ariel Hukporti in Philadelphia and some fans unconvinced that Andre Drummond is the right answer behind Karl-Anthony Towns, there was at least a path for Robbins to make a case for himself.
Instead, the early returns have gone the wrong way.
Against San Antonio, Robbins was one of the least effective Knicks on the floor. In 13 minutes, the 27-year-old seven-footer missed both of his shot attempts, and both were from three-point range.
He also committed a team-high five turnovers, picked up six fouls and finished with a minus-14 rating. His line included two defensive rebounds and one assist, but that wasn’t nearly enough to offset the rest of the night.
The bigger issue is that this hasn’t been a one-game blip. Through two Summer League appearances, Robbins is averaging 2.0 points, 3.0 rebounds and an assist while shooting 50.0% from the field and missing both of his three-point tries this summer. Add in the five Summer League games he played with the Wizards last year, and he’s now 3-of-15 from deep in this setting, a 20.0% mark.
That’s a tough profile to sell if the Knicks are trying to identify their No. 3 center for opening night of the 2026-27 season. The defending NBA Champions need steadiness behind Towns and Drummond, and Robbins hasn’t shown enough yet to suggest he’s ready for that role.
His next chance comes Monday afternoon against the Pistons. New York still has at least two more games after that, but another flat performance would only sharpen the pressure around this experiment. There’s still time before the regular season to sort out the depth chart, but Robbins needs to give the Knicks something real soon.
For now, the resume remains what it is: 8.7 points, 5.1 rebounds, 1.3 blocks and .473/.308/.632 shooting splits across 45 career NBA G League games. The Knicks are still waiting to see that version show up in a New York uniform.
In Other News...
Knicks May Have Pulled Off A Quiet Free Agency Steal With Shamet
The Knicks kept Landry Shamet around because they value exactly what he brings: shooting, spacing and a steady hand in a playoff rotation. For a team built around its core, having a guard who can slide into a role without demanding the ball is useful, and New York clearly sees Shamet as one of those lower-profile pieces that can still swing meaningful minutes when the games tighten up.
What makes the move stand out is the price. Shamets four-year, fully guaranteed deal comes in at $14.3 million, a number that looks especially sharp for a player whose production and efficiency held up well last season. In a market where reliable shooting can get expensive fast, the Knicks may have found a cost-effective fit who gives them exactly the kind of depth contenders usually have to pay more to get. [Read more 🡒]
Knicks Title May Have Just Changed The NBAs Biggest Money Fight
Victor Wembanyamas next Spurs deal is already doing more than setting up San Antonios future. By agreeing to a rookie-scale extension and taking the lower max slot, he gave the franchise a little more room to navigate the cap and luxury tax while it tries to keep building around him, a reminder that the leagues newest stars are now being asked to think like front-office partners as much as franchise pillars.
That decision also lands in the middle of a broader fight over how much the NBAs current system should squeeze teams and players alike. NBPA executive director David Kelly has been openly critical of the second apron and the way it can put the financial burden on players when clubs want to keep a contender together, a debate that has only grown louder as more teams weigh flexibility against spending. [Read more 🡒]