Josh Hart And Draymond Green Clash Over Jalen Brunson's Sacrifice

Tensions flare as Draymond Green and Josh Hart clash on social media over Jalen Brunson's financial decisions and loyalty to the Knicks.

Josh Hart’s decision to call out an old Draymond Green clip didn’t land quietly. It pulled Green right back into a conversation he had already made clear he felt strongly about: Jalen Brunson and the money he left on the table with the Knicks.

The exchange started when a few-year-old appearance by Green on the “Club 520” podcast with Jeff Teague resurfaced on Monday. In that clip, Green argued that Brunson should not have taken a discount to stay with New York.

“It’s the New York Knicks, bro. They can afford it.

You ain’t got to take no discount for them to get paid. My situation is different because Steph making $270 [million], Klay making $180 [million].

All right, something got to give. Cool.

I can take less.”

“[But] he the top guy. Let Josh Hart or somebody else take less.

They in my role. But guess what, Steph Curry ain’t take a penny less.

And neither did Klay Thompson ain’t take a penny less. ... I don’t know what he doing."

Hart, who is now an NBA champion and has become one of the Knicks’ most vocal voices, saw the clip and fired back on Tuesday with a message aimed at the broader idea of players judging each other’s contracts: “We got to normalize grown men not counting other peoples pockets.”

Green answered on Thursday, and he didn’t hide his annoyance. He took issue with Hart responding long after the original video and doing it only after the Knicks had already won.

“Dude waited 2 years to respond to that video from 520? Why not say it then?

Let's normalize not front runnin and talking while you up," Green wrote on Threads. "Be on the same type of time AT ALL TIMES!”

The backdrop to all of it is Brunson’s decision in 2024 to sign an extension with the Knicks rather than wait for a bigger payday. He gave up about $113 million in the process, passing on the chance to become eligible for a five-year, $269 million contract and instead taking a four-year deal worth $156.5 million.

Brunson said at the time that the choice was about helping New York build a title team, especially with the tougher financial rules around roster construction.

“I think about every decision that I make and I’m completely comfortable with what I’ve done,” Brunson said, per ESPN. “Obviously I’m well off, myself and my family, we’re obviously well off, so that’s first and foremost.

But I want to win. I want to win here.”

After the Knicks won the title in June, Brunson was asked about the decision again and said he was comfortable with it because it let him play without worrying about his contract hanging over him.

“You never know what can happen in a year,” Brunson said on The View. “When it was presented to me, obviously the deal, being able to play with a free mind, not thinking about if I play well, if I do this, if I do that.”

In Other News...

Knicks Finally Have A Real Answer To Their Backup Center Problem

The Knicks have addressed one of the quieter but more important roster questions of the summer by adding a true backup center with a clear job description. Andre Drummond is coming in to give the second unit a physical presence, one built around rebounding, rim protection and keeping the defense steady when the starters sit.

For a team that has spent plenty of time sorting through frontcourt fit, the appeal is less about chasing another scorer and more about defining roles. New York is betting that clarity matters here, with Drummond asked to do the rugged work inside and help preserve the identity the Knicks want to carry through every stretch of the game. [Read more 🡒]

Knicks Just Got A Troubling Clue About Pacome Dadiet's Trade Value

The Knicks are still weighing ways to clear roster and financial room, and Pacme Dadiet has emerged as one of the names that could be moved if they decide to reshuffle the back end of the roster. The idea is straightforward enough: Dadiet is young, inexpensive and still largely unproven, which makes him a logical candidate if New York wants to create flexibility for a more useful piece in the frontcourt.

The catch is that the market may not be as friendly as the Knicks would like. A recent move involving Johni Broome showed that even a player with limited NBA mileage can require a second-round pick to get dealt, and Dadiets own uneven early track record only adds to the uncertainty around his value. If New York does find a taker, the payoff would be the chance to open room for a more playable veteran or a more experienced third center, but the price to make that happen may be higher than expected. [Read more 🡒]