The clock controversy from Michigan’s 13-12 win over Western Michigan is still bouncing around the college football world, but ESPN’s Dan Wetzel says the final result is not really in dispute.
On his weekly podcast with Reece Davis and Pete Thamel, Wetzel pushed back on the idea that the Broncos were robbed by the ending, pointing to the timing of Bryce Underwood’s first Hail Mary attempt and the evidence the Big Ten used in its ruling.
“In truth they won the game,” Wetzel said. “I was watching these Zapruder films and they got the stop watch.
It took 8.3 seconds for that first Hail Mary to go down. There was nine seconds left on the clock.
So there was time. The Big Ten clock, whatever the heck that was, was actually correct.
The NBC clock was wrong. The MAC is arguing we should use the wrong clock because using the wrong clock is the right protocol then using the wrong protocol to get the right clock, and the NCAA basically came out and said yes, I agree.”
The dispute centers on whether there was still time left when Western Michigan defender jumped and touched the first pass after stepping out of bounds previously. A new video circulating online shows the ball being tracked and, according to the Big Ten’s interpretation, there was still one second remaining when contact was made.
Western Michigan President and others have argued that the Broncos should be credited with the win, but that argument only works if the game ended after 59 minutes and 59 seconds. In a 60-minute game, Michigan’s final play stands as the deciding moment: Underwood delivered the throw, J.J. Buchanan made the catch, and the clock still had time on it.
The Big Ten’s explanation has already been released, including raw footage, yet the debate has continued. Western Michigan initially agreed with the conference’s statement, before the MAC pushed a different public message claiming the Broncos had won.
Michigan, meanwhile, took a hit anyway. The Wolverines dropped out of the AP poll after being ranked 16th, even though the win came against a team that won its conference last season. The ranking drop may have made sense, but the result itself should not have been rewritten.
The bigger issue, from Michigan’s perspective, is that Underwood and Buchanan’s plays were buried under accusations that the Wolverines were “cheaters.” That came even after the Big Ten put the video out there and tried to explain the call.
There was also a shot taken at the way some rankings handled the game, with Jeff Saragin’s ratings cited as an example of how far things have drifted. The point, as framed here, is simple: rankers can judge results, but they can’t invent their own.
The argument also drew a comparison to Michigan’s 2016 loss in “The Game,” when JT Barrett was said to be clearly short on a fourth down that would have ended it, though replay did not get the call right. The broader point is that a blown call does not change the record book.
So while the conversation has centered on Western Michigan being cheated, the reporting here says the opposite is true: Michigan was the team that got the raw deal. The officials made the call, and even if the call was wrong, Michigan had no hand in it.
In Other News...
Nebraskas Defense Gets A Key Return At The Perfect Time
A timely boost is coming back to Nebraskas defense in Week 2, with Owen Chambliss confirmed to rejoin the lineup just as the Cornhuskers look to clean up some early communication issues. The linebacker arrives with real credentials, having been a First-Team All-Conference pick in the Mountain West, and his presence should give the unit a steadier middle as the season settles in.
What makes Chambliss especially valuable is the role he can play beyond making tackles. He will wear the defensive headset, a sign Nebraska wants his voice helping direct traffic and cut down on assignment mistakes, while also leaning on his pass rush, coverage and quarterback-containment ability. For a defense still finding its rhythm, getting that kind of all-around presence back now could make a noticeable difference. [Read more 🡒]
Nebraska Is Using This Weekend To Shape Rhules Next Few Classes
Nebraska is spending this game weekend in Lincoln the way a program trying to build something sustainable should, by getting an unusually large group of young recruits on campus and letting them see the place up close. The visitors include committed players from the 2027 class, along with a wide mix of prospects from the 2028, 2029 and 2030 classes, giving the staff a chance to introduce the next wave of targets to the environment before the process ever gets serious.
For Matt Rhules staff, the point is less about immediate decisions and more about laying groundwork that can pay off years from now. These kinds of weekends matter because they help establish relationships early, and Nebraska is clearly using the opportunity to stay ahead of the curve with players who are still a long way from signing day. [Read more 🡒]
Nebraska Has A New Debate After Week 1 Standouts Took Over
Week 1 did more than give Nebraska an early-season pulse. It also stirred up a familiar kind of internal debate about which player is setting the tone for the Huskers right now. A weekly ranking of the roster leaned on recent performance and overall importance, and the list brought a few names to the front, including Luke Lindenmeyer, Jamir Conn, Jamal Rule, Anthony Colandrea, Justin Evans and Janiran Bonner.
Matt Rhule and Dana Holgorsen both offered praise for the way those players have shown up, underscoring the mix of mindset, physicality and impact that can separate a good contributor from the guy everyone else is chasing. The larger question for Nebraska fans is the one that never really goes away after an eye-opening opener: who is actually the best football player on this roster, and who is becoming indispensable as the season takes shape? [Read more 🡒]