Canadiens Fans Still Wonder What Went Wrong With This Deadline Splash

Thomas Vanek's brief impact with the Montreal Canadiens highlights the unpredictable nature of mid-season trades and their implications on team dynamics.

Thomas Vanek’s run with the Montreal Canadiens is one of those stretches that’s easy to lose in the shuffle, even though it checked just about every box for weird. Montreal swung for him at the 2014 trade deadline, got a burst of offense down the stretch, and then watched the whole thing end with no extension and no real lasting footprint.

The story starts before he ever got to Montreal. Vanek had long been the face of the Buffalo Sabres, but with his contract set to expire after the 2013-14 season, Buffalo dealt him to the New York Islanders.

He thrived there right away, saying that playing with John Tavares and Kyle Okposo was the best line he had ever been on. The numbers backed it up: 17 goals and 27 assists in 47 games.

Then came the relocation news. Once it was announced the Islanders would be leaving Nassau Veterans Memorial Coliseum after 43 years for Barclays Center, Vanek made it clear he wanted no part of that move.

It was reported that he turned down a seven-year, $50 million extension because of the arena change. With free agency looking more and more likely, the Islanders moved him before the deadline to avoid losing him for nothing.

That deal came together at the buzzer. Reports said no team was willing to meet the Islanders’ asking price until the final minutes before the 3 pm deadline, when Montreal finally stepped in. The Canadiens sent prospect Sebastian Collberg and a second-round pick to the Islanders and got Vanek plus a fifth-round pick back.

Montreal wanted goals, and Vanek was supposed to provide them. The beginning was sluggish.

He managed only one assist in his first five games with the Canadiens, and it looked for a moment like the fit might take a while. Then he broke loose against the Colorado Avalanche.

Down by one after the first period, Vanek got Montreal even midway through the second. He wasn’t finished.

With the game tied at three in the third, he put the Canadiens ahead with a little more than five minutes left, then finished off the hat trick three minutes later. From there, he settled in as a major part of Montreal’s push, finishing the regular season with 11 points in the team’s final 12 games.

That was the version of Vanek the Canadiens were hoping for. The playoffs, though, told a different story.

He did help Montreal open with a four-game sweep of the Tampa Bay Lightning, recording a point in three of the four games. Against the Boston Bruins, he had some big moments too, scoring two goals in Game 2, picking up an assist in Game 3, and adding two more goals in Game 6. But the gaps between those outings were too quiet, and the inconsistency became impossible to ignore.

The Eastern Conference Final against the New York Rangers was where things really faded. Vanek managed only two assists in six games as Montreal lost the series in six, a matchup that will always be remembered as the “ What-if Price did not get hurt ” series.

When the postseason was over, Vanek had 10 points in 17 games, down from 15 points in 18 during the regular season. He had only five points at even strength in the playoffs. What looked like a strong bet to re-sign in Montreal instead turned into a non-offer from GM Marc Bergevin, and Vanek left in free agency for the Minnesota Wild.

For a brief stretch, he gave the Canadiens exactly what they wanted. Then he vanished when it mattered most, which is why his Montreal chapter still feels like one of the strangest trades in team history.

In Other News...

Canadiens Fans Will Love Where Suzuki Stands Among NHL Centers

Nick Suzuki keeps building the kind of profile that matters most in Montreal: not just production, but trust. NHL Networks recent center rankings placed him firmly among the leagues best, a nod to the way he drives the Canadiens as both a top-line pivot and a steadying presence in all situations. For a team still shaping its identity, Suzukis rise is the sort of validation fans have been waiting for.

The recognition also speaks to a broader stretch of respect for the Canadiens core, with Jakub Dobes, Lane Hutson, and Cole Caufield all showing up in NHL Networks positional rankings as well. But Suzuki remains the headline name in that group, and his standing invites the bigger question now facing Montreal: how far can a captain-caliber center carry a roster that is starting to collect more league-wide attention? [Read more 🡒]

Slafkovsky And Demidov May Have Changed Montreals Top-Six Plan

Juraj Slafkovsky, Oliver Kapanen and Ivan Demidov gave the Canadiens something they had been searching for when they were together as a second line against Colorado in 2025: real chemistry. The combination looked natural in the way good young lines often do, with Slafkovsky and Demidov especially standing out on a sequence that showed how much offensive comfort the two already have with each other.

That kind of fit matters in Montreal because it could influence how the rest of the top six is built from here. With Demidovs arrival adding another layer of creativity and Slafkovsky continuing to grow into a bigger role, the Canadiens still have to decide whether to keep leaning into those internal options or keep exploring outside help to strengthen the group around them. [Read more 🡒]

Canadiens Fans Still Cant Agree On Mike Mathesons Real Value

Mike Matheson keeps landing at the center of the Canadiens endless debate about what he really brings. He logs the most ice time on the blue line, handles penalty-killing duty, and still gives Montreal a useful second wave of offense, which is enough for coach Martin St-Louis to keep leaning on him in key spots.

Still, the fan base does not seem close to a consensus. Some of the criticism has stuck, but his defensive numbers have not painted him as the teams weakest link in turnovers, and the larger question is how Montreal should view a player who is both heavily trusted and regularly picked apart. With his long-term place in the organization now set, the conversation around Matheson feels less about whether he matters and more about exactly how much. [Read more 🡒]