Missouri’s nonconference slate looks like more than just a warmup act this time around. It might be the thing that tells us whether this team is built for March.
A year ago, the Tigers had four nonconference games against major-conference opponents, and only two of those teams finished with a winning record. This season is a different animal. Missouri has seven games against major-conference opponents in the 2026-27 season, and six of those seven came off winning seasons last year.
The jump in quality is even clearer when you look at the rankings. Last season, Missouri’s only nonconference games against top 25 opponents were Kansas and Illinois. This year, the Tigers have three games against teams in ESPN’s Way-Too-Early Top 25 and two more against teams that landed in the top 30.
That stretch in particular stands out: Pitt, Kansas, Nebraska, Indiana and Illinois in five straight games. Add Saint Louis and Marquette in November, and Missouri is packing its schedule with the kind of tests that can harden a team long before tournament time arrives.
That matters because this version of Missouri has real buzz around it. The Tigers added a batch of transfer talent and two five-stars in Jason Crowe Jr. and Toni Bryant, giving them one of the most intriguing rosters they’ve had in years. ESPN slotted Missouri at No. 21 in its early rankings, and both freshmen sit inside the top 15 of SC Next 100.
There’s also a timing issue here. Crowe is likely headed to the draft next season, which makes 2026-27 feel like a pivotal year for Missouri.
A deep tournament run could help keep the five-star pipeline flowing. A disappointing season could leave the program without this level of talent for a while.
That’s why the nonconference schedule matters so much. Missouri has six teams on the slate that are expected to make the tournament, and that kind of early pressure can pay off when the bracket gets real.
The Tigers learned the hard way last March. They fell in the first round of March Madness to No. 7 seed Miami, and while there wasn’t one obvious reason for the second-half collapse, having more than two non-SEC games against opponents of that caliber might have helped.
The season before that was another short stay. Missouri entered the NCAA Tournament as a No. 6 seed and still went out in the first round, again with limited experience against top-level teams outside the SEC. In back-to-back years, the same issue showed up: the Tigers weren’t ready when the lights got brightest.
Yes, the SEC gives Missouri plenty of high-end competition. But those games often come with rivalry layers and other built-in variables.
March is different. The teams that survive are usually the ones that have already spent time dealing with the pure, stripped-down pressure of tournament-style basketball.
That’s the edge Missouri is chasing now. The nonconference games won’t decide everything, but they could make a huge difference for a team that has real upside and a real chance to go deep.
In Other News...
Finebaum Just Reopened Missouris Biggest Drinkwitz Debate
Eli Drinkwitz has given Missouri plenty to like since taking over in 2020, especially with the programs strong runs in 2023 and 2024. The Tigers have clearly moved forward under his watch, but the conversation around Drinkwitz in Columbia has never been just about progress. It has also been about whether Missouri can turn that progress into the kind of win that changes how the program is viewed nationally.
Paul Finebaums skepticism has only put that old debate back in the spotlight. Missouris 7-19 mark against ranked opponents under Drinkwitz is the kind of number that keeps resurfacing whenever the Tigers are asked to take the next step, and it is the reason every big opportunity still carries extra weight. For all the improvement, the lingering question remains whether Missouri can finally deliver the signature victory that matches the optimism around the program. [Read more 🡒]
Naeshaun Montgomery Could Be Mizzous Next Receiver Fans Need To Know
Naeshaun Montgomery is the kind of receiver Missouri fans can circle for later, even if his role right now is still mostly about development. The redshirt freshman arrived with plenty of recruiting cachet after a brief stint at Florida, and the Tigers have a player with a quick first step, reliable hands and the kind of versatility that can make a wideout harder to ignore once he settles in.
Montgomerys path at Missouri may be shaped as much by the veterans in front of him as by anything he does in practice. With established starters ahead of him, he has time to absorb the offense and refine his game, but the Tigers also know that receivers with his athletic profile can move from backup to impact piece quickly if the opportunity opens up. For now, he looks like one of those names worth remembering when the conversation turns to Missouris future passing game. [Read more 🡒]
Missouri Suddenly Has A Costly Decision On One Of Its Best Players
Mark Mitchells offseason took an unexpected turn after a court ruling opened the door for many four-year college basketball players to seek an additional season of eligibility, and Missouri now finds itself weighing a familiar but costly kind of roster question. The veteran forward has been one of the Tigers most accomplished players, a two-time All-SEC selection whose production and presence made him central to everything Missouri wanted to do last season.
For Missouri, the bigger issue is no longer just what Mitchell meant on the floor, but what keeping him around might require in a suddenly crowded market. With his future now up in the air, the Tigers have to consider both the financial commitment and the roster ripple effects if he stays, while also knowing other programs can make their own pitch. Whether Mitchell ultimately returns or moves on, the uncertainty alone has changed the way Missouri has to plan its next step. [Read more 🡒]