Eli Drinkwitz Takes Another Shot At CFP Power Brokers

Could Eli Drinkwitz's vision for a radically expanded College Football Playoff create a fairer path for teams based on performance rather than selection committees?

Eli Drinkwitz is back on the SEC Media Days stage, and once again the Mizzou coach is pushing the same core message about college football’s playoff future: give teams more access, and stop letting a committee decide who gets in.

Drinkwitz has already made noise on this topic before. In 2025, he floated an expanded College Football Playoff setup that would use play-in games to build the field out from 12 teams to 30.

That idea drew plenty of attention last July. Now, with the sport still arguing over what the next version of the playoff should look like, the bigger field no longer feels far-fetched.

The fight now is over how big it should be.

But Drinkwitz says the people shaping the format missed the point of his proposal.

“I was one of the first to come up with an idea,” Drinkwitz said Monday, “and somebody totally screwed it up.”

At the center of the current tug-of-war is a split between the SEC and the rest of the Power conferences. SEC commissioner Greg Sankey is standing alone in support of a 16-team model, while the other Power conferences, with the Big Ten leading the way, have signaled support for a 24-team format.

Drinkwitz’s complaint isn’t really about the number. It’s about the process.

His version of expansion would remove the selection committee entirely and put the burden on the field itself. In the example he laid out in 2025, the top eight SEC teams would play in play-in games to reach the playoff, and other conferences would use similar setups for their highest-ranked teams.

No committee. No debate.

Just games.

That’s not how the current proposals work. Both the 16-team and 24-team ideas still keep a selection committee in place, and under those models the committee would actually be responsible for choosing even more teams.

“I think the challenge for me is there shouldn't be a committee in determining who enters into the playoffs,” Drinkwitz said earlier Monday on the SEC Network set. … “We need more access.

Twelve is too small, but going one through 24 and telling me a playoff committee is going to select 24 teams that are going to deserve to be in the playoffs? That’s insanity to me.”

For this season, the setup is already mapped out: each Power conference champion will earn a playoff spot, the top-ranked Group of Six champion will get in automatically, and Notre Dame can reach the field if it finishes in the top 12. The deadline to settle the 2027 playoff format is in December.

Drinkwitz made the same point again Monday in Tampa, Florida, saying the sport should open the door wider without handing more power to a committee.

“I'm for expanded opportunities for schools in the playoffs. I just think when you have, I think it's 138 Division-I playing schools, we have to have more opportunities and access to the playoffs,” Drinkwitz said.

“I am not for giving the committee more opportunities to put teams in the playoffs. As nice as I can be about it, committees are a bad idea in deciding on who should get in sports arenas.

“Sports are meant to be played and decided on the field.”

Drinkwitz also pushed back on another part of the larger playoff conversation: the idea of eliminating conference title games.

That remains a major issue for the SEC, especially with Sankey still backing the 16-team model. The conference championship game brings in huge television revenue, and if the playoff grows to 24 teams, the calendar would need to make room for another weekend of games. That has put conference title games in the crosshairs.

Drinkwitz doesn’t want them gone.

“Conference championships are important,” Drinkwitz said. “Need to be preserved.

They're highly entertaining. They're highly valuable from a monetary standpoint.

They're highly valuable from a fan-engagement standpoint.

“So throwing those away so you get a bad matchup between (teams ranked) 24 and 18 doesn't make a lot of sense to me.”

In Other News...

Eli Drinkwitz May Have Crossed A Line With Latest SEC Joke

At SEC Media Days, Eli Drinkwitz managed to turn a routine offseason segment into something far less harmless, and the Missouri coachs latest joke immediately drew attention for all the wrong reasons. The moment came during a televised appearance while he was discussing Cayden Green, giving the comment a national stage and making it impossible to separate from the broader conversation around the Tigers.

The issue is bigger than a bad punch line because it lands in the middle of Ahmad Hardys recovery, with the reigning SEC Newcomer of the Year still working his way back after a shooting earlier this year and no clear timetable for his return. Hardy, a Mississippi native who underwent surgery after the incident, has already been through enough without becoming the target of a joke that many around the program are likely to see as ill-judged. [Read more 🡒]

Mizzou Just Got The O-Line Update Fans Were Dreading

Missouris offensive line picture took another hit this week, and it comes at a spot the Tigers were counting on to stabilize. Transfer tackle Josh Atkins was expected to step in at right tackle, but his recovery from a leg injury that first surfaced in March has not gone as smoothly as hoped, leaving the coaching staff to keep adjusting its plans up front.

Eli Drinkwitz said Atkins has had a setback in his rehab, which makes his return less certain as the season moves along. For now, Missouri is leaning on other options to hold things together, including Luke Work and Logan Reichert, with Jack Lange also in the mix, as the Tigers try to protect the edge while waiting to see how much more progress Atkins can make. [Read more 🡒]