In the wake of Kyler Murray's recent signing with the Minnesota Vikings, there’s been a buzz around why a talent like him was even available. After all, the Cardinals opted for Jacoby Brissett as their main quarterback for most of the 2025 season, leaving many to wonder what led to Murray's limited playtime.
Albert Breer from Sports Illustrated sheds light on the situation, clarifying that the decision wasn't as straightforward as a simple benching. Following a standout performance by Brissett in a 27-17 victory over the Cowboys, questions lingered about Murray's readiness to return.
Although he practiced before losses to the Colts and Packers, his foot injury was a major concern. With his foot only about 60% healed, playing risked a more severe Lisfranc injury due to a blood-flow issue.
The Cardinals made the call to place Murray on injured reserve right after naming Brissett the starter, giving Murray a month to heal. By December 5, with Arizona sitting at 3-9 and on a losing streak, both the team and Murray decided it was best to shut him down for the season.
So, Murray's absence wasn’t a benching in favor of Brissett but a necessary move to protect his health. Had the Cardinals been in playoff contention, it’s likely Murray would have returned to the field. His record as a starter since 2023 stands at 13-17, not stellar but significantly better compared to the team’s 3-19 record without him.
For Vikings fans, concerns about Murray's durability are valid. However, the narrative that he was benched in favor of Brissett doesn't hold up.
Instead, it was a strategic decision rooted in caution and circumstance. As Minnesota looks to the future, understanding the context of Murray's past season is key to appreciating what he can bring to the team.