Michigan enters the 2026 season with almost no margin for error, and the road to the College Football Playoff looks brutal from the jump. With six preseason top-25 teams on the schedule, per the Coaches Poll, the Wolverines are going to have to survive week after week against a slate that leaves very little room for slip-ups.
That doesn’t mean 9-3 is off the table, but it does mean the path to a playoff berth gets narrow fast. With a young roster, plenty of changes, and head coach Kyle Whittingham in his first season coaching in the Big Ten, getting through the year with three losses or fewer would still give Michigan a resume worth talking about. The key is knowing which games can’t be allowed to slip away.
The first big fork in the road comes early with Oklahoma or Indiana. A win over the Sooners would give Michigan an immediate boost against an SEC opponent and could reshape the way the committee views the Wolverines, especially if the Big Ten schedule gets messy later. Brent Venables has Oklahoma positioned to be dangerous, particularly on defense, so that matchup has real weight.
If Michigan doesn’t handle business in Week 2, then Indiana takes on even more importance. The Hoosiers are coming in as a Big Ten frontrunner after winning both the conference and national titles last year, and Curt Cignetti’s team still has plenty of belief around it even after losing Fernando Mendoza and others to the NFL.
The preseason top-10 ranking says plenty about how the coaches see Indiana. Michigan would love the Oklahoma win, but beating Indiana would be a huge step for both the Big Ten race and the CFP résumé.
One of those two games has to be a win.
The same kind of pressure hangs over the November road trips to Oregon and Ohio State. Those are the kinds of hostile environments that can decide a season, and both teams should be among the best in the country unless something wild happens. Michigan almost certainly has to win one of them to stay in the CFP conversation.
That’s because dropping games to Oregon and Ohio State, plus one more somewhere else on the schedule, starts to look awfully dangerous. It’s not impossible to survive that kind of record, but Texas showed last season how hard it is to stay in the mix with three losses.
The Longhorns had one ugly defeat working against them, but they also couldn’t knock off one of the two biggest tests on the schedule and wound up as one of the first teams out. Michigan can’t afford to end up in that same position.
There’s also the matter of Iowa and Penn State. If Michigan has already taken care of either Oklahoma or Indiana and later manages to beat Oregon or Ohio State, then it doesn’t need both of these games.
Still, neither one should be taken lightly. Iowa is always a tough out, even though Michigan won’t have to go to Kinnick Stadium this time.
Penn State, meanwhile, will be chasing a statement win in Matt Campbell’s first season as head coach.
Because those games come early, both could still carry top-25 weight when Michigan gets to them. If that’s the case, they become even more important. At the very least, winning one of the two would put the Wolverines in a strong position before the November stretch arrives.
And then there’s Michigan State, the game that feels non-negotiable. Ohio State is the one Michigan fans circle every year, and losing that one always stings.
But from a playoff standpoint, the Buckeyes game doesn’t have to be fatal. There are paths where a loss there still leaves Michigan standing.
Michigan State is different. With this schedule, the Wolverines don’t have the luxury of wasting a game they should have.
A loss to the Spartans could leave them needing to win the final three games of the season unless they were unbeaten to that point. And if Michigan were undefeated heading into that matchup, then the only loss on the ledger being to the in-state rival would be a bitter pill.
So yes, Michigan State has to be a win. No wiggle room, no excuses.
In Other News...
Dusty May Finally Opened Up About His Sudden Michigan Exit
Dusty May was back in Ann Arbor recently for a hip procedure, and the timing also gave him a chance to talk publicly about how quickly his Michigan tenure ended. In an interview with Brian Boesch, the former Wolverines coach looked back on a stretch that moved faster than anyone expected, even after he had just guided Michigan to a national title.
May said the shift came after the championship run, when the NBA came calling and the Dallas Mavericks made their pitch. He pointed to the leadership in Dallas, the young core on the roster and the chance to coach at that level as major factors, a combination strong enough to pull him into a move that arrived earlier than he had originally planned. [Read more 🡒]
Michigan Chasing Another High-Upside Defensive Line Project
Michigan has kept leaning into high-upside defensive line bets, and Jeremiah Mark is the latest name to surface on the 2027 board. A former basketball player who is still relatively new to football recruiting, Mark has already started drawing multiple Power Five offers, which is why his rise has begun to attract the attention of major programs across the country. Michigans recent commitment from four-star edge rusher Ifeanyi Emedobi, another player with limited football experience, fits the same mold and shows the staff is clearly willing to bet on traits as much as polish.
The next step in that pursuit will come with a game-day visit, as Michigan plans to bring Mark in for a closer look in an atmosphere that should give him a feel for the programs pitch and development track. For a staff that has already shown a willingness to chase raw, toolsy defensive linemen early, the visit is another chance to make an impression before the recruiting battle gets even busier. Mark is also making the rounds at several major conference schools, so Michigan will need that visit to land well if it wants to stay in the mix. [Read more 🡒]
Bryce Underwood Just Landed In A Heated Big Ten QB Debate
The preseason Big Ten quarterback conversation is already getting testy, and Michigans Bryce Underwood is right in the middle of it. Todd McShay and Josh Pate turned in sharply different quarterback rankings, with McShay bristling at where Pate slotted UCLAs Nico Iamaleava and Underwood among the conferences top passers. The disagreement comes down to philosophy as much as personnel, with one side leaning on what has already been shown on the field and the other trying to project what these quarterbacks can become.
For Michigan fans, Underwoods spot in the debate is a sign of how quickly his name has entered a bigger conversation. The freshman season is the backdrop here, and so is the broader uncertainty around how to weigh upside against proven production in a league that is always eager to argue about quarterbacks. Iamaleavas recent career moves and uneven performance only add another layer to the discussion, but the real tension is whether rankings like these should reward present-day rsum or long-term expectation. [Read more 🡒]
