Two days later, Michigan’s 20-19 loss to Iowa still doesn’t make much sense.
The Wolverines had the better of the numbers in Saturday’s Big Ten opener, yet Iowa walked out of the Big House with a one-point win. That’s the kind of result that lingers, because the game itself looked messy enough already: a personal foul that erased a 4th-and-12 stop, a failed leap on 4th-and-inches, a red-zone interception, and then Iowa ripping off a 91-yard drive in two minutes.
The advanced metrics only make it sting more. Bill Radjewski of CollegeFootballData.com posted Saturday that Iowa’s postgame win expectancy was just 19 percent. He also noted that Michigan “statistically dominated most advanced stats categories, including a 45% to 27% success rate advantage.”
Iowa had a 19% postgame win expectancy in their last-second 20-19 victory over Michigan.
Michigan statistically dominated most advanced stats categories, including a 45% to 27% success rate advantage.
More from the advanced box score: https://t.co/5lAnhryEmK pic.twitter.com/hYuihJy50T
- Bill Radjewski | CollegeFootballData.com (@CFB_Data) September 26, 2026
That’s the frustrating part for Michigan fans: the performance suggested one thing, the final score said another.
Iowa did what Iowa does. The Hawkeyes avoided the kind of self-inflicted damage that usually buries teams, and they leaned on special teams to stay alive.
They had multiple punts downed inside the five and even returned a kickoff for a touchdown. Without that kind of hidden-yardage swing, they’re probably not in position for the late-game steal.
Michigan had its own chances to shut the door and didn’t cash in. The Wolverines got into scoring territory three times and came away with only three points.
Underwood also threw an interception in the red zone. On the rewatch, it appears clear Underwood was trying to throw a back-shoulder fade to Marsh, who was running a different route, something Kyle Whittingham confirmed Monday.
Underwood also tried to jump for a first down on a 4th-and-short instead of taking the low route on the QB sneak. The run-game choice stood out too: Michigan had used the same play while pinned deep, and Iowa knew it was coming but still couldn’t stop it.
Michigan also settled for a field goal on another drive. If those three red-zone trips all end with field goals, the Wolverines win.
Hindsight is 20/20, but the deeper you dig into this one, the harder it is to figure out how Iowa pulled it off.
In Other News...
Michigan Fans Will Be Second Guessing One Late Coaching Choice
Michigans one-point loss to Iowa was the kind of game that leaves a fan base replaying the final minutes over and over. The Wolverines had their chances in a 20-19 defeat, but the closing sequence is likely to be the part that lingers most, especially with the offense leaning on the run game when the game was hanging in the balance.
The biggest talking point is the late decision to run the ball three straight times, a choice the article attributes to head coach Kyle Whittingham. It is the sort of call that can look sensible in the moment and frustrating in hindsight, and for Michigan it now sits at the center of what went wrong in a game that slipped away by the slimmest of margins. [Read more 🡒]
Michigan Defense Did Enough To Win Until Two Costly Mistakes
For most of the afternoon against Iowa, Michigans defense did what it had to do. It kept the Wolverines in front, squeezed the Hawkeyes offense and gave the team a chance to ride the lead, with CB Zeke Berry, edge Dom Nichols and S Chris Bracy all drawing strong grades for their work on a unit that generally looked in control.
Still, the game turned on a handful of mistakes that proved too costly to absorb. Michigan finished with seven missed tackles, and a couple of critical penalties and breakdowns helped undercut all the good work that came before them, leaving the defense with the frustrating feeling that it had done enough to win until it didnt. [Read more 🡒]
Michigan Finally Has A New Offensive Line Question To Solve
After the bruising Iowa game, Michigans injury report offered a little bit of movement along a unit that has been searching for stability all season. Kyle Whittingham said John Henry Daleys situation is still murky for now, but there should be a clearer read by Wednesday, while offensive lineman Andrew Babalola is on track to begin practicing next week after sitting out the first four games with a knee injury.
Andrew Spragues status at right tackle is still being evaluated, leaving the Wolverines with another front-line question to sort through as they turn the page. For a team that has already had to adjust on the offensive line, Babalolas return could become a timely piece of the puzzle, even if the full answer on who is available up front is still not in hand. [Read more 🡒]