Michigan State athletic director Dan Bartholomae is drawing a clear line in the sand: if the Spartans want to be competitive in football right away, the money has to follow.
In a letter to MSU fans sent Wednesday afternoon, just days before the homecoming game against Illinois, Bartholomae said the program needs more support now and in the future. That means funding roster building and stadium work at the same time.
“Football must be resourced to be competitive immediately, and they will be,” Bartholomae wrote. “Providing those resources as we build towards the future is my primary focus every day.
This includes resources for roster development AND other football priorities such as Spartan Stadium renovations. We can’t just pick one - they both must be addressed.”
The push comes with Michigan State’s football program in a rough stretch. The Spartans have dropped three straight, and another roster shakeup appears likely. A few weeks ago, The Athletic placed MSU’s NIL efforts in the bottom half of the Big Ten, estimating the program’s value at between $21 million and $25 million.
Bartholomae’s message also makes clear that Michigan State knows it has work to do explaining how it’s operating in the current college sports environment. The biggest examples are Spartan Ventures, the department’s new affiliated company built to streamline brand and NIL deals, and “For Sparta,” the fundraising campaign tied to upgrades for Spartan Stadium, the Breslin Center and other campus athletic facilities.
Those two efforts were also central to Greg Williams’ massive $401 million donation in December 2025, with $290 million designated for “For Sparta” and another $100 million going as a seed investment in Spartan Ventures.
“Buy-in from our community will only be achieved if we are clear about our vision and explain our decisions,” Bartholomae wrote. “Transparency will allow staff and fans to feel invested in our initiatives. From there, success will follow.”
He added: “The two most pressing areas that need more explanation are Spartan Ventures and FOR SPARTA. While both initiatives serve to benefit Spartan Athletics, there’s a great opportunity for more transparency, direction and clarity.
And while I sense urgency in the need for that, it needs to be genuine, true to my own leadership style and in strategic alignment with our goals. As we formalize the direction for our future, I look forward to offering more information in the months ahead.”
Bartholomae has also been vocal about the broader financial arms race in college sports. On Sept. 30, during an appearance on “Staudt on Sports,” he said Michigan State needs to do more across both NIL and revenue-sharing.
“We need to do better there across the board [on NIL and revenue-sharing] -- revenue sports and non-revenue sports,” Bartholomae said. “If we want to be serious about winning -- and I want to be serious about winning, I know our coaches want to be serious about winning -- we can't play around and say, 'Well, we'll just try to get to the cap.' We need to be at the cap.”
“We're not there. We need to get there by next year, and there's a number of sports where I'm having conversations with those coaches today to put them in the position to be successful while they're recruiting for next year.”
The timing matters for Pat Fitzgerald, whose next transfer portal class should offer a real read on what kind of backing he has at MSU. Fitzgerald spent his Northwestern years operating with limited resources, and part of the intrigue in this move is seeing what he can do with more at his disposal in East Lansing.
Even Northwestern has climbed closer to Michigan State in that area. The Athletic’s same valuation placed the Wildcats in the $21 million to $25 million range, and they now also have the benefit of the new Ryan Field.
Another issue looming over all of this is the Protect College Sports Act, which passed the Senate by a 77-22 vote about a week ago and is now awaiting a House vote. Right now, schools can spend roughly $21.5 million a year in direct revenue-sharing with athletics. If the bill becomes law, that number would rise to about $48 million.
Bartholomae wants Michigan State to get there.
He didn’t put a specific number on football in his letter, but the direction is obvious. The Spartans are likely going to have to spend aggressively to build the roster back up after several losing seasons, and the price of staying competitive keeps rising.
For football, the target probably sits in the upper-30 million range - enough to keep key players and add impact help through the transfer portal this winter.
In Other News...
Michigan State Faces New Lineup Uncertainty In Critical Illinois Week
Michigan States prep for a pivotal Big Ten matchup against Illinois got a little clearer, and a little more complicated, when the schools released their initial player availability reports ahead of the game. The Spartans already know they will be without linebacker Caleb Wheatland because of injury, while Cam Fancher, Tre Bell and Jordan Hall all landed in the questionable category as the week heads toward kickoff.
Illinois, meanwhile, has its own availability questions to sort through, with running back Ca'Lil Valentine ruled out, defensive back Tywan Cox listed as doubtful and guard Champ Smith tagged questionable. For Michigan State, the report adds another layer of uncertainty in a game where depth and availability could matter just as much as game plan, especially with both sides still awaiting final word on a few key names. [Read more 🡒]
Michigan State Gets A Revealing Look At Illinois Before Homecoming
Michigan States upcoming homecoming opponent comes into the matchup carrying plenty of conversation points, and a fresh look at Illinois makes clear why the Spartans cannot treat this as a routine conference week. An interview with Isaac Ambrose of The Champaign Room painted the Fighting Illini as a team still working through the pressure of heightened expectations, with questions around quarterback Katin Housers play and a supporting cast that has had to shoulder different kinds of responsibility as the season has unfolded.
The more revealing part for Michigan State is on the other side of the ball, where Illinois has had to navigate both injuries and changes in how the defense is being run. Ambrose touched on those complications, along with the recent coaching turnover that has altered the backdrop for the Illini heading into East Lansing. For a Spartan team trying to get a read on what kind of test it will face, the interview offered a useful snapshot, but also left enough uncertainty to make Saturdays matchup worth watching closely. [Read more 🡒]
Michigan State Faces A Former QB In A Game It Desperately Needs
Saturday brings an unusual kind of familiarity to Spartan Stadium, with former Michigan State quarterback Payton Houser returning as part of the Illinois lineup. Housers path has been a winding one since leaving East Lansing, eventually taking him to East Carolina for a starting job and then on to Illinois, where he has added more game experience to an already busy college career.
For Michigan State, the matchup comes with a little extra edge because it is facing a player who knows the program from the inside while still trying to steady itself in the present. Housers story has been one of movement and opportunity, but the Spartans are the side with the bigger immediate need as they try to make Saturday count in a game that carries more than the usual November weight. [Read more 🡒]