The Big Ten race is already taking shape before the 2026-27 season even gets going, and the debate at the top comes down to two familiar powers: Illinois and Michigan State.
Illinois enters with the louder preseason buzz. The Illini are being talked about as a top-five team nationally and a real title threat, and the league title is absolutely on the table.
Michigan, once part of the conversation, has faded after losing head coach Dusty May and projected starter Brandon McCoy to a season-ending injury. That leaves Michigan State as the main challenger.
The annual unofficial Big Ten basketball media poll, run by The Columbus Dispatch, reflected that split. Illinois was picked first, with Michigan State right behind it.
For Brad Underwood’s team, this is familiar territory. Year after year, he has built rosters that sit near the top of the conference, with a system that brings out the best in the talent he brings in. Last season followed that same pattern for a while, as Illinois finished fourth in the league after dropping five conference games, including four by one possession.
Then came the late surge. After another loss to Wisconsin in the Big Ten Tournament, the Illini caught fire and rode their offense and a suddenly elite defense all the way to the Final Four.
That defense is the big reason Illinois feels different now. Scoring has never been the issue under Underwood.
The shift came on the other end, where the Illini looked far more locked in and far more dangerous. Ben Humrichous, Keaton Wagler and Kylan Boswell are gone, but the biggest defensive loss may be Humrichous, whose length, mobility and effort made him such a useful piece.
Illinois still looks upgraded on that side of the floor. David Mirkovic should take a step forward.
Andrej Stojakovic is expected to be better defensively. Freshmen Quentin Coleman and Lincoln Williams both have the tools to become real stoppers.
And the Ivisic twins are still there, with Tomislav apparently adding even more range.
If that group brings the same communication and detail Illinois showed during its 2026 NCAA Tournament run, the Illini could end up with the best defense of the Underwood era.
The offense should stay dangerous, too. Illinois wants to run, score in transition and avoid grinding through the same old halfcourt possessions. With more ways to attack, and less dependence on Wagler ball-screen action, the Illini look harder to scout and tougher to contain.
Michigan State has its own case, and it starts with Jeremy Fears Jr. and Tom Izzo. Fears is the best individual talent in the group, and Izzo remains one of the sport’s defining regular-season coaches, with 11 Big Ten regular-season championships on his resume.
That matters in a conference like this. Izzo’s name is usually tied to March, but his track record before the tournament is just as intimidating.
Coen Carr is back, and his value goes well beyond the highlight-reel dunks. He is a strong defender, a high-level rebounder, a dangerous rim runner and an efficient finisher, having shot over 60 percent inside the arc in every season of his career.
The Spartans also bring back guards Jordan Scott and Kur Teng, while Cam Ward enters Year 2. Jesse McCulloch has drawn buzz this offseason, and Charlotte transfer Anton Bonke gives the frontcourt another body. Add in freshmen Jasiah Jervis and Carlos Medlock Jr., and Michigan State has real depth, something Izzo teams have not always had in recent years.
That’s why this race is so interesting. Illinois may have the better overall talent, better fit and the stronger offense. Michigan State could start the year with the sturdier defense, and history says Izzo’s team will be a problem all season long.
But on paper, the edge goes to Illinois. The Illini’s projected defensive jump, combined with their already potent offense, makes them the more complete team right now.
Michigan State is close. Illinois just looks a little better.
The Big Ten is Illinois’ to lose.
In Other News...
Michigan State Faces New Lineup Uncertainty In Critical Illinois Week
Michigan States prep for a pivotal Big Ten matchup against Illinois got a little clearer, and a little more complicated, when the schools released their initial player availability reports ahead of the game. The Spartans already know they will be without linebacker Caleb Wheatland because of injury, while Cam Fancher, Tre Bell and Jordan Hall all landed in the questionable category as the week heads toward kickoff.
Illinois, meanwhile, has its own availability questions to sort through, with running back Ca'Lil Valentine ruled out, defensive back Tywan Cox listed as doubtful and guard Champ Smith tagged questionable. For Michigan State, the report adds another layer of uncertainty in a game where depth and availability could matter just as much as game plan, especially with both sides still awaiting final word on a few key names. [Read more 🡒]
Michigan State Gets A Revealing Look At Illinois Before Homecoming
Michigan States upcoming homecoming opponent comes into the matchup carrying plenty of conversation points, and a fresh look at Illinois makes clear why the Spartans cannot treat this as a routine conference week. An interview with Isaac Ambrose of The Champaign Room painted the Fighting Illini as a team still working through the pressure of heightened expectations, with questions around quarterback Katin Housers play and a supporting cast that has had to shoulder different kinds of responsibility as the season has unfolded.
The more revealing part for Michigan State is on the other side of the ball, where Illinois has had to navigate both injuries and changes in how the defense is being run. Ambrose touched on those complications, along with the recent coaching turnover that has altered the backdrop for the Illini heading into East Lansing. For a Spartan team trying to get a read on what kind of test it will face, the interview offered a useful snapshot, but also left enough uncertainty to make Saturdays matchup worth watching closely. [Read more 🡒]
Michigan State Is Sending A Clearer Message About Football Money
Michigan State athletic director Dan Bartholomew is making the case that football funding needs to be a more visible priority, and he did it in a letter aimed directly at fans. In it, he laid out why the program needs stronger backing, pointing to the dollars required for roster development and stadium renovations while tying those needs to the departments broader push through Spartan Ventures and the For Sparta campaign.
The message also comes with a bigger-picture legislative angle, as Bartholomew noted the possible effect of the Protect College Sports Act on athletics revenue-sharing rules. For a program trying to keep pace in a changing model, the issue is not just how much money can be raised, but how clearly the department communicates where it is going and why it matters. [Read more 🡒]