LSU’s roster crunch may have quietly solved Lane Kiffin’s latest standoff.
With two injured players back on the Tigers’ official roster, LSU is now at the NCAA limit of 105, according to a source. Cornerback Aidan Anding and defensive end Gabriel Reliford have been added back, and that leaves no current opening for tight end Dae’Quan Wright or defensive tackle Zxavian Harris.
That matters because Wright and Harris were the two former Ole Miss starters at the center of a fast-moving legal and conference fight. Wright was with the Browns this preseason but did not play, while Harris signed with the Saints and never practiced. Both were recently cleared for a fifth season by a preliminary injunction from a Baton Rouge court.
The SEC reacted by laying down penalties for any member school that added athletes who had previously signed with or been rostered by professional teams. That set off another round of legal maneuvering, including a federal lawsuit filed by the SEC in Alabama. In an amended filing Tuesday, the conference said it was preparing a Thursday vote to consider expelling LSU from the league.
A hearing in Alabama was scheduled for Wednesday on a temporary restraining order targeting several LSU officials, including the entire board of supervisors, president Wade Rousse, athletic director Verge Ausberry and Kiffin. Louisiana attorney general Liz Murrill was also named as a defendant.
If LSU really is full, though, the school has no room to roster Wright or Harris, and that would spare it from the SEC’s harshest threatened punishment. Kiffin would have faced a six-game suspension, LSU would have been hit with a fine equal to half its operating budget, and the Tigers would have lost their conference voting privileges.
There’s still another layer to this, though. If LSU does not put Wright and Harris on the roster, the school could run into trouble under the terms of the Baton Rouge injunction that made them eligible in the first place. Judge William Jorden’s ruling barred LSU, along with the SEC and NCAA, from taking steps that would block the plaintiffs’ newly granted right to play fifth seasons.
Anding and Reliford both suffered season-ending injuries in spring practice. Anding tore an Achilles tendon, while Reliford tore his ACL.
Tony Clayton, the attorney for Wright, Harris and the other plaintiffs in the Louisiana case, said he plans to seek damages from the NCAA and SEC, but not LSU.
“I’m gonna meet with the clients, and I’m gonna meet with the lawyers, and we plan on having the clients pursue Sankey personally, the NCAA, if they allow us to, and the SEC,” Clayton said, “because this is not an issue of LSU. Quite frankly, I doubt that LSU rosters the guys. They haven’t rostered any of these kids.”
LSU did roster former Notre Dame defensive end Junior Tuihalamaka, another plaintiff in the lawsuit. He played on special teams in the opener against Clemson, and unlike Wright and Harris, he never signed with an NFL team, so LSU avoided any risk there.
Kiffin said after LSU’s 51-10 win over Clemson on Saturday that he pushed to sign Wright and Harris because he believed they deserved another season.
“My job is what I believe is right,” Kiffin said, “and I believe we were fighting for what was right for those kids. I'm not going to get into all the reasons, but that's what I believe. Many people don't like that, but they don't understand.
“Maybe if they knew my relationship with Dae’Quan, they'd think a little different.”
In Other News...
LSU Fans Had Tiger Stadium Tailgate Chaos Everyone Will Be Talking About
The night around Tiger Stadium had plenty going on before LSU even kicked off against Clemson, but one ugly moment at a tailgate ended up overshadowing part of the pregame scene. Kick creator Snarp was punched in the face by an LSU fan during the chaos, and the incident reportedly left him with a broken jaw, turning what should have been a spirited season-opener atmosphere into something far more troubling.
Once the game started, the Tigers gave their supporters plenty to cheer about with a 51-10 rout of Clemson, piling up more than 600 yards while the defense held Clemson to 145. Still, the lopsided win did not erase the uneasy conversation that came out of the parking lots and tailgate spaces around the stadium, where the focus had already shifted from football to how quickly a festive scene can turn into a mess. [Read more 🡒]
LSUs SEC Fight Just Turned Into A Threat Tigers Cant Ignore
The SECs latest federal filing has pushed LSU into a spot no program wants to occupy, turning an eligibility fight into a full-blown conference threat. The league is now seeking legal authority to expel the Tigers over alleged violations of SEC rules that bar professional athletes from returning to college sports, and the update points directly to the ongoing effort to roster players the conference classifies as former pros.
At the center of the dispute are LSU players DaeQuan Wright and Zxavian Harris, whose eligibility has become the flashpoint as the conference continues to press its case. The filing also references a special league meeting in which potential termination was discussed, a sign that this is no longer just an administrative issue but a matter with real stakes for LSUs place in the SEC structure. [Read more 🡒]
Lane Kiffins Leaked Clemson Speech Has LSU Fans Debating Everything
A video purporting to show LSU football coach Lane Kiffin delivering a profane halftime speech during the Tigers' game against Clemson has been making the rounds online, and it has quickly become the kind of clip that can dominate a fan base's group chats long after the final whistle. The footage has been met with a split reaction, with some viewers convinced it is authentic and others arguing it could be an imitation, which has only added to the noise around a team already under intense scrutiny.
A source familiar with Kiffin says the speech is real and may even have been leaked on purpose, a detail that has only deepened the debate over why it surfaced now and what it says about the situation behind the scenes. For LSU fans, the bigger issue is less the clip itself than the uncertainty around it, because the conversation has moved well beyond a viral video and into questions about trust, timing and who wanted this version of events to become public. [Read more 🡒]