Tuesday night’s College Football Playoff rankings offered a preview of what the sport may be handing fans when the bracket grows to 24 teams in 2027: a field packed with programs that look more relieved to be included than worthy of celebration.
Start with LSU at No. 21.
The Tigers are 6-3, their own fans are furious, and they are one loss away from calling it a season. They have no wins over anyone in the top 25 of the Sagarin Ratings, yet under the expanded format they’d still be in the field.
That kind of entry would be easy for SEC commissioner Greg Sankey to sell as progress, even if the team might otherwise be headed to the Music City Bowl.
Ohio State sits right behind them at No. 20, also 6-3, and already has begun cleaning up the mess by firing its special teams coach. The Buckeyes have dropped consecutive regular-season games for the first time in 15 years and consecutive games by double digits for the first time in 22 years.
Their home loss to Oregon ended with thousands of empty seats. If this is the product, the question practically asks itself: who wants to see that team travel to No.
13 Wake Forest in December?
USC checks in at No. 18 at 7-2, and even that record hasn’t settled the noise around Lincoln Riley. The payoff for sliding into a 24-team bracket would be another trip to the Midwest, this time for a matchup with No.
15 Iowa. Iowa City in mid-December may be charming, but it would not exactly be a simple getaway for fans in Los Angeles.
Then there’s South Carolina at No. 17, also 6-3, a team that was already drawing heat for Shane Beamer five games into the season. Its first-round opponent would be No.
16 Oregon, another 6-3 team that has already moved on from its offensive coordinator. If this is what the opening round looks like, it has more in common with a college basketball play-in than a marquee postseason event.
That is the future college football leaders are steering toward from 2027 through ’31, at least until they decide to tinker again. Maybe 30 teams will sound better next time.
Maybe 40. The people running the sport never seem to stop until every Big Ten and SEC team has a path into the bracket.
There is, unsurprisingly, little public appetite for the move from 12 teams to 24. Rich Clark, the CFP executive director, acknowledged the resistance on Monday, saying, “We’re aware of the fan sentiment and that many fans aren’t in favor of expansion,” Clark said.
“That was certainly weighed into the decision. It was considered.
Ultimately we just need to make a spectacular playoff. I mean, the CFP has a responsibility to our fans, they’re the lifeblood of college football.
We owe it to them to make this great. That really is our intent.
We appreciate our fans. We did take into account their sentiment.
That was rolled into this decision. But we decided to move forward with it.”
The message underneath that sounds a lot less polished: the decision was made, and the sport is moving on whether fans like it or not.
The people driving the change-commissioners, athletic directors and coaches-believe the bigger bracket will make it easier to raise money for roster costs. But the financial upside may not be as dramatic as advertised, especially if conference championship revenue gets traded for only a modest bump in media-rights money. ESPN also was never going to spend lavishly on first-round games that may not draw much of an audience.
A matchup like Missouri at Kentucky, if it lands on a weeknight, is not exactly a ratings magnet. Neither is Arizona at BYU.
And USC at Iowa? That’s a hard sell too.
The CFP’s rollout on Monday included a graphic showing what a 24-team bracket would have looked like using the 2024 season. That version would have included three Group of 6 teams, among them Army.
In this year’s theoretical field, though, only one Group of 6 team would be in as of today: Boise State. The other spots would be dominated by the usual power conferences, with nine teams from the SEC, six from the Big Ten, five from the Big 12 and two from the ACC.
Notre Dame would claim the final automatic path to the bracket.
That’s the real shape of the thing: a bigger tournament that still mostly rewards the same powers, while dressing it up as access. The latest rankings make the case plainly enough.
The 24-team playoff will not just be larger. It will be cluttered, crowded and full of teams that already feel ordinary in November.
In Other News...
Kim Mulkey Just Landed Another Frontcourt Talent LSU Fans Will Love
LSUs frontcourt plans for the future got a boost in February when Caroline Bradley, one of the nations top recruits out of Oak Grove, Louisiana, chose the Tigers. The highly regarded prospect is set to make it official during the NCAA early signing period, adding another in-state name to Kim Mulkeys growing pipeline of talent.
Bradleys commitment matters not just because of her ranking, but because of the connection she already has with Mulkey and the fit she appears to offer for LSUs womens basketball program. She is expected to arrive with the chance to make an immediate impact starting next season, giving the Tigers another promising piece to build around up front. [Read more 🡒]
LSU Gets A Whit Weeks Boost As Texas Prep Brings New Concern
LSUs first injury report of the week brought a little relief and a little unease as the Tigers turn their attention to Texas. Linebacker Whit Weeks is listed as questionable after sitting out the previous game with a fractured fibula, giving LSU at least the possibility of getting one of its key defenders back in time for a major matchup.
The report also added fresh concern, with offensive tackle Weston Davis and defensive end Gabriel Reliford showing up among the seven players listed. LSU is already working without Phillip Wright III, Dashawn Spears and Charles Ross II, all of whom are out for the season with leg injuries, so the Tigers are managing both the hope of a boost and the reality of a growing health list as the week unfolds. [Read more 🡒]
LSUs Playoff Push Just Took A Hit Fans Cant Ignore
A trip to Alabama was always going to be a measuring stick for LSU, but the Tigers came away with a 31-13 loss that leaves them 6-3 and with plenty to sort through. Even in defeat, there were a few bright spots, with Jackson Harris and TreyDez Green turning in notable performances, but the overall picture was hard to ignore as LSU spent much of the night chasing the game.
Braelin Moore had a rough outing, and the bigger concern was how often the offense seemed to fight itself in key moments. The play calling and coaching decisions drew criticism as LSU struggled to find rhythm, leaving the Tigers with more questions than answers as the playoff push gets tighter. [Read more 🡒]