Sunday night’s Rams-Broncos thriller ended with the kind of pass interference debate that always seems to drag Sean McVay and Sean Payton into the center of the storm. This time, the controversy landed in nearly the same patch of turf as the infamous 2018 NFC Championship non-call between the Rams and Saints: just outside the L.A. five-yard line.
That’s where the late play unfolded, and it split opinion fast. Some saw interference. Others didn’t.
I saw interference.
Rams defensive back Josh Wallace got his right hand into Broncos receiver Pat Bryant and shoved him just before the ball arrived. The key rule is straightforward enough. When the ball is in the air, one of the prohibited acts is: “Contact by a player who is not playing the ball that restricts the opponent’s opportunity to make the catch.”
That’s exactly what it looked like here. If the defender is shoving the receiver away from the ball as it gets there, common sense says the receiver’s chance to make the catch has been restricted.
The only real question is whether Wallace was playing the ball. He did end up making the interception, and on one level he was clearly trying to get to the pass.
But the shove with the left hand wasn’t part of an attempt to catch the ball. It was part of keeping Bryant from getting to it.
That kind of move is probably a technique Wallace has picked up along the way as a defensive back. It’s the sort of subtle, well-timed contact that can slip past an official trying to process everything at once.
Bryant also sold the contact hard, flopping after the shove. The SGA-level reaction was over the top, but it doesn’t erase the shove itself.
The NFL already went down this road once after the 2018 disaster, when the league made pass interference calls and non-calls subject to replay review. That fix turned out to be a mess and lasted only one season.
And that’s the heart of the issue: pass interference is a judgment call. Reasonable people can look at the same play and land on opposite sides.
That’s why former officials on television can be frustrating when they break down these moments as if their view from a monitor is the only one that matters. The real question isn’t whether they personally think interference happened. It’s whether the official on the field, making a split-second decision with the naked eye, went too far or not far enough.
The best TV analysis of the Broncos-Rams play would have sounded something like this: “If probably wouldn’t have thrown a flag if I was in that position, but there’s enough there to justify someone else making a different decision.”
In Other News...
Rams Fans Have A New Reason To Be Furious About That Late Flag
A late pass interference flag in Week 3 already left Rams fans seething, and now Pat Bryant has made the whole sequence look even worse. The Broncos receiver admitted in an interview that he exaggerated the contact on the play against Josh Wallace, a call that wiped out Wallaces interception and kept Denvers drive alive before it ended in a game-winning touchdown.
Bryants comments have only added fuel to the frustration because the play had such a direct impact on the outcome. He also played a part in the Broncos win with two catches, including a touchdown, but it is the flag he helped draw that has drawn the loudest reaction from Rams supporters and plenty of criticism online. [Read more 🡒]
Rams Already Face Doubts About A Linebacker Bet They Needed To Win
Before Week 12 of the 2025 season, Nate Landman had done enough to convince the Rams he was worth locking in. The linebacker signed a three-year, $22.5 million extension after 11 strong weeks, a move meant to give the defense some needed stability in the middle and reward a player who had quickly become part of the plan.
Since then, the return has not matched the investment. Landmans play has slipped, his Pro Football Focus grades have dropped, and the disruptive moments the Rams were counting on have become harder to find. For a team that viewed the deal as a way to secure a reliable presence at linebacker, the timing of the extension is suddenly looking a lot less comfortable than it did when the ink was still fresh. [Read more 🡒]
Rams Fans Wont Ignore This Sean McVay Career Twist
Kirk Herbstreit is set to stay with Amazon Prime Videos Thursday Night Football beyond the 2026 season after reportedly signing an extension, but the deal comes with a notable wrinkle for Rams fans. Amazon is said to have flexibility to explore other broadcast options down the road, and that list could include Sean McVay, whose name has lingered around TV and media speculation for a while now.
Herbstreit is also entering the final year of his ESPN contract, which only adds another layer to an already unsettled broadcasting picture. For the Rams, the immediate concern is on-field success, but McVays long-term future keeps surfacing whenever NFL media openings come up, and this latest Amazon development gives that conversation a little more room to breathe. [Read more 🡒]