The NFL trade market keeps moving, and every new deal has a way of throwing the Rams’ Myles Garrett gamble into sharper relief.
On Tuesday, the Seattle Seahawks landed Quenton Nelson, and the San Francisco 49ers added DeForest Buckner. Then on Wednesday, the Chicago Bears struck again, bringing in defensive tackle Jeffery Simmons from the Tennessee Titans. That one mattered for Los Angeles, too, because it gave the league another clean comparison point for just how much the Rams surrendered to get Garrett.
The Bears didn’t have to wait to see Simmons in action. The Rams, meanwhile, are still stuck in limbo with Garrett, who has been on injured reserve for the last six weeks.
Even after reports said Garrett would return to practice this week, Los Angeles chose not to open his 21-day practice window. At this point, the initial six-week outlook has stretched and stretched, and now it looks unlikely he returns before the bye week.
The Rams go to Washington next week to play on grass at a field that has historically been lower quality, even if it has been upgraded in recent years. After that comes a rematch with the Cardinals, and it’s possible the Rams believe they can handle Arizona without him.
That makes the price tag even harder to ignore. When the Rams acquired Garrett, they sent out a 2027 first-round pick, Jared Verse, a 2028 second-round pick and a 2029 third-round pick. That is a massive package for a player who still hasn’t taken a healthy snap for the team.
Breer said that Bears general manager Ryan Poles and George McCaskey’s side studied other big deals before landing on their offer for Simmons, including the Rams’ Garrett trade.
“Borgonzi’s research into the Watson, Stafford, Wilson and Hunter deals, had put a ballpark price in his head for what it might take to actually part with Simmons. He told Poles he’d need the Browns’ equivalent they got from the Rams in the Myles Garrett trade,” wrote Breer.
“The Rams gave up a 2027 first-round pick, a 2028 second-round pick, a 2029 third-round pick and star rusher Jared Verse for Garrett. Verse’s inclusion, as Borgonzi saw it, is why the 2028 pick was a second-rounder rather than a first.
And the third-rounder Cleveland got was two and a half years off, devaluing it a bit.”
Chicago ultimately sent 2027 and 2028 first-round picks along with a 2027 fourth-round pick to get Simmons. It was a big swing, but it also underscored how the Rams’ own deal had become a reference point around the league.
The big difference is timing. The Bears get Simmons now. The Rams are still waiting for Garrett to get healthy after placing him on injured reserve before Week 2.
To be clear, Simmons wasn’t some simple substitute for Garrett. They don’t play the same position, and Los Angeles already had a strong defensive line with Kobie Turner, Braden Fiske and Poona Ford. Simmons also signed an extension with the Titans in June, so he probably wasn’t realistically available anyway.
Still, the contrast says plenty about the risk Los Angeles took.
The Rams have usually made these splashy moves pay off. Their trade for Matthew Stafford ended with a Super Bowl.
Jalen Ramsey became a major part of the secondary. Brandin Cooks didn’t match those heights, but he still played well in 2018.
Garrett, though, has been a different story so far. The Rams couldn’t have planned for him to appear in just one game seven weeks into the season.
And there’s a fair argument that Los Angeles got a little too aggressive, chasing an upgrade it didn’t truly need. They were already set at pass rusher, but viewed Garrett as a better option than Verse.
That was the bet. Right now, they’re paying for it.
The numbers help explain why the wait has felt so costly. The Rams rank 17th in pressure rate at 39 percent and 28th in sack rate at four percent, even while blitzing at a 28.1 percent clip, which ranks 15th. Last season, they were second in pressure rate, ninth in sack rate and had the lowest blitz rate in the NFL.
None of that means the Rams should have gone after Simmons instead of Garrett. It does, however, show why making the move before the season carried more danger than reward.
By going early, Los Angeles burned future draft capital and gave up a young pass rusher who could have kept helping the defense. That also left the front office with less flexibility for the trade deadline.
For now, the Bears get to watch Simmons on Monday and see what he does for a defense trying to make a push in a crowded NFC. The Rams are still waiting for their own headline deal to actually produce on the field. At the moment, that investment has not paid off.
In Other News...
Rams Trade Deadline Plans May Hinge On One McVay Reality
Sean McVays latest comments offered a familiar kind of midseason Rams uncertainty, the sort that can shape everything from Sundays rotation to the trade deadline. Los Angeles is hoping to get key injured players back within the next month, and that timeline matters because the front office is still weighing how aggressive to be as the deadline approaches.
McVay made it clear that those injury statuses will help determine whether the Rams go shopping or stand pat, which is the real hinge point here. If the roster gets healthier soon, the pressure to add help eases. If not, the Rams may have to decide whether to trust the current group or look for outside help before the deadline closes. [Read more 🡒]
Myles Garretts Offseason Support For Chloe Kim Is Turning Heads
Chloe Kims recent conversation about her ADHD diagnosis offered a more personal look at life away from the competition, and it also put Myles Garrett in the spotlight for the way he has handled the adjustment. Kim described how the diagnosis has changed the way the two communicate, along with some of the everyday routines and small accommodations that have come with it. It was the kind of candid update that gives a little more texture to a relationship that has mostly been viewed from a distance.
Garrett, meanwhile, is navigating his own recovery after knee surgery, so both athletes are managing major parts of their lives at once. For the Rams star edge rusher, the offseason has clearly been about more than rehab and training, with Kims remarks suggesting his support has been steady through a process that can be as much about learning as it is about treatment. Kim continues her athletic career, and the overlap in their schedules and challenges makes this a notable subplot for anyone following Garrett beyond the football field. [Read more 🡒]
Rams Chargers Suddenly Carries Bigger Stakes Than Just Bragging Rights
The Rams Week 8 meeting with the Chargers is shaping up to mean more than the usual Los Angeles bragging rights. With the NFL trade deadline set for Nov. 10, the game arrives at a moment when both teams could be thinking beyond the scoreboard, and the ripple effects may reach well past Sundays final whistle.
The Chargers are widely expected to be sellers no matter how the matchup turns out, which adds another layer to a game already carrying local intrigue. For the Rams, though, the stakes are more fluid, since their appetite for moving veterans could hinge on how they look in this stretch, while outside chatter has already started tying possible Chargers trade pieces and potential Rams targets to the deadline market. [Read more 🡒]