Lakers New-Look Roster Already Has One Worry Fans Cant Ignore

The Lakers' revamped roster faces scrutiny as contract lengths could hinder future flexibility in their quest for championship success.

The Lakers spent the offseason reshaping the roster around Luka Doncic and Austin Reaves, but ESPN’s Brian Windhorst says the real issue with Rob Pelinka’s work comes down to contract length.

On The Hoop Collective podcast, Windhorst argued that Los Angeles would view its supporting cast very differently if the deals were all shorter by a year. In his view, the Lakers have stocked the roster with useful players, but the structure leaves less room to maneuver later.

“All the role players on their whole roster, okay, if they all had one year less on their contracts, you would look at them completely differently. I know that’s a big if, but, like, if Jarred Vanderbilt didn’t have the player option and he was just an expiring $12 million contract, that’s something you could do something with.”

Windhorst pointed to Collin Sexton as another example.

“If Collin Sexton just had the one-year, $9 million deal, he’s hugely incentivized to play well this year. And Vanderbilt and Sexton together are $21 million. You know, if Grimes is on a three-year deal instead of four, if Mamu is on a three-year deal instead of four.”

He then made his broader point about the way the Lakers handled the offseason.

“No, look, they got to win. You know, they’re in some cases negotiating against other teams that, you know, they got to try to win. But I’m just saying, like, it’s like every guy on their-every guy that they signed this year, and Vanderbilt was signed a couple years ago, but still signed by Pelinka, every contract is a year too long.”

“The only guy whose contract I wish was a year longer is Luka’s. That’s the guy whose contract you wanted to get longer, and he, you know, signed a little short. So, his extension-and looking for-or he’s in extension zone after this season.”

Vanderbilt is on a four-year, $48 million deal. Sexton signed a two-year contract worth $19.3 million. Windhorst’s point was simple: if those deals ended a year sooner, they would become the kind of expiring contracts that can swing trade talks.

That $21 million in hypothetical salary, he said, would have given the Lakers a useful lever. Instead, he sees a pattern of the team adding an extra year to the books in multiple places.

The new-look group includes Sexton, Quentin Grimes, Sandro Mamukelashvili, and Walker Kessler, while Vanderbilt remains from the previous roster. Grimes, Mamukelashvili, and Kessler all got three guaranteed seasons with player options attached.

Windhorst did acknowledge the reality Pelinka was operating in. The Lakers weren’t building in a vacuum, and they had to compete with other teams for players who fit alongside Doncic. Still, he said the same issue keeps showing up.

He also noted the one player whose deal he would have preferred to see go the other direction: Doncic. The Lakers star signed a three-year extension that guarantees two seasons and includes a player option, giving him the chance to hit another massive contract as the cap rises, but leaving the Lakers without the long-term certainty they would prefer from their centerpiece.

That does not mean the offseason was a miss. JJ Redick has praised the roster construction, especially the wing depth, and has pointed to expected gains in paint touches, three-point volume, and offensive rebounding.

Kessler gives the Lakers the interior defender they have lacked for years, while Grimes, Sexton, and Mamukelashvili add more options around Doncic and Reaves.

Windhorst’s concern is not about the talent. It’s about what happens if the fit isn’t perfect. If the Lakers need to reshape the roster again, those extra years and player options could make that a much tougher job.

In Other News...

LeBrons Surprise 76ers Jersey Choice Had A Meaning Lakers Fans Know

LeBron James surprise appearance with the 76ers at their intersquad scrimmage came with a jersey choice that carried a little extra meaning. Instead of the No. 6 or No. 23 most fans associate with him, he showed up wearing No. 9, a nod to Julius Ervings retired No. 6 and a number tied to several personal chapters in his life, including the one Bronny James wears and the number he used in high school football and at the 2004 Olympics.

James is still expected to wear No. 23 once the regular season begins, but the choice at the scrimmage offered a quick look at how he tends to treat even the small details with intention. For Lakers fans, it was the kind of familiar LeBron touch that turns a simple uniform decision into a reminder that his moves usually come with a story attached, even if the bigger one is still to come. [Read more 🡒]

Pelicans Fans Know Why Lakers Should Worry About Kevon Looney

Kevon Looney arrives in Los Angeles with the kind of resume that usually earns a team a little patience, thanks to his three NBA titles and the steady reputation he built over a long run in Golden State. The Lakers brought him in on a one-year veteran minimum deal to back up Walker Kessler, a move that gives the frontcourt some needed insurance while Kessler continues to manage a recent injury history.

Still, there is already some unease around whether Looney can be the kind of reliable No. 2 center the Lakers need, and that concern is informed in part by how things looked during his time with New Orleans. Early camp reporting and last season's performance indicators have prompted questions about his mobility and impact, which leaves the Lakers weighing whether they have enough behind Kessler or whether they may need to search for another answer before the season settles in. [Read more 🡒]

Bronny James Just Became A Real Lakers Roster Dilemma

Bronny James is no longer just a name attached to the Lakers most famous family tree. Entering his third NBA season, he has started to look like a legitimate roster piece, drawing trade interest from other teams because of the way he has developed into a 3-and-D point guard. For a Lakers team always balancing the present against the future, that kind of progress changes the conversation fast.

The Lakers are not actively shopping him, and a more likely move would be waiving another player if they need to clear space. Still, Bronnys improved shooting and expanded defensive responsibilities have made him far more than a developmental flyer, and that gives Los Angeles a real decision to weigh if offers keep building. This season also brings a different backdrop for his growth, with LeBron James no longer on the Lakers roster, adding another layer to how the team views his place in its plans. [Read more 🡒]