Rui Hachimura had options when free agency opened this summer, and one Spurs reporter thinks the choice he made with the Clippers might already be looking rough.
Hachimura, who previously played for the Los Angeles Lakers, was also on the radar of the San Antonio Spurs. According to the report, San Antonio offered him the full mid-level exception and a chance to start, with the idea of pairing him next to Victor Wembanyama on a team built around plenty of draft capital and a bright future.
But Hachimura stayed in Los Angeles and signed with the Clippers on what was described as the same money: 2 years, $28M. The deal also includes a second-year team option.
“Watching the Clippers implode today, you have to wonder if Rui Hachimura regrets his July free agency choice,” Garza wrote on X.
“The Spurs called him with the full (midlevel exception) to put him next to (Victor Wembanyama) on a contender with plenty of draft capital and a bright future but instead, he took the exact same money (2 years, $28M) to stay in LA with the Clippers (except the deal he took features a second-year team option. Ouch!) The Spurs immediately pivoted and signed Tobias Harris when they heard him waffling.”
Hachimura may simply have wanted to remain in Los Angeles, and there’s nothing wrong with that. It was his decision to make. Still, the Spurs’ pitch appears to have offered a cleaner basketball fit, along with a better immediate path to winning.
In Other News...
Kawhi Leonards Clippers Scandal Is Raising One Damaging Question
The NBAs penalties in the Clippers salary cap scandal have already landed hard, with the franchise losing draft picks and Kawhi Leonard being fined $700,000. But the fallout has not stopped at the league office. The case has become a broader conversation around how much Leonard knew, how much he benefited, and whether the punishment fits the scope of a scheme that now sits at the center of one of the leagues messiest cap investigations.
Former player Markieff Morris has publicly questioned the leniency of Leonards punishment, while journalist Pablo Torre has pointed to documents and reporting that tie Leonard to endorsement dealings connected to the scandal. Torre has also disputed the idea that Leonard was simply unaware of what was happening around him, which has kept the scrutiny squarely on the Clippers star even after the leagues decision. [Read more 🡒]
Clippers Trade Idea Just Changed The Post-Scandal Debate
A speculative trade framework has pushed the Clippers long-running draft-pick problem back into the center of the conversation. NBA insider Sam Quinn floated the idea on a podcast as a way for Los Angeles to start rebuilding its asset base after the penalties tied to the salary cap scandal, with the basic logic being less about aesthetics and more about repairing a roster and front-office balance that still feel the effects of the punishment.
The discussion is especially intriguing because it ties the Clippers immediate team-building needs to a bigger question about how aggressive they should be in chasing help while they try to recover from the fallout. No official deal is on the table, but the mere fact that a trade like this is being weighed says plenty about how thin the margin remains for a franchise trying to win now and dig itself out at the same time. [Read more 🡒]
Clippers Face A Painful Trade Decision To Rebuild Their Future
The Clippers are still living with the cost of their past, and that reality keeps pushing them toward uncomfortable roster questions. After losing multiple future first-round picks in the wake of the cap circumvention investigation, the franchise has fewer clean ways to replenish its talent, which is why any path to extra draft capital suddenly matters so much. In that light, one speculative trade idea has them exploring a bold pivot: taking on DeAaron Foxs sizable contract in order to add another premium asset and keep the pipeline from running dry.
From San Antonios side, the logic is tied to Foxs contract and a playoff showing that may not have helped his long-term fit. For the Clippers, the appeal is obvious even if the price is painful, because a team that has already spent so much future flexibility cannot afford to ignore chances to recover a pick. The real question is whether they would be willing to pay that bill by parting with a key guard to make the math work, or whether the more valuable prize is enough to justify the risk. [Read more 🡒]