The Bucks are staring at the same kind of danger the Clippers just absorbed, and Gary Trent Jr.’s contract is the reason why.
The NBA’s punishment of Los Angeles on Sept. 2 showed exactly how far the league is willing to go when it believes salary cap rules were broken. After a yearlong investigation into Kawhi Leonard’s contract, the Clippers were hit with a massive blow: five first-round picks stripped away, a $30 million fine for owner Steve Ballmer and suspensions for Ballmer, Lawrence Frank and Gillian Zucker.
Leonard was fined $700,000, but he avoided any suspension or contract voiding. He is set to return to his former team with the Toronto Raptors to begin the 2026-27 season after Los Angeles and Toronto agreed to trade Leonard for Brandon Ingram, Gradey Dick, two unprotected first-round picks, one first-round pick swap and two second-rounders.
For the Clippers, though, the damage is long-term. They will be without first-round picks from 2029 through 2033, and the punishment leaves a rebuilding team in an even deeper hole.
That’s why Milwaukee is paying close attention. The Bucks are under their own investigation involving Trent and the contract they gave him, and the possibility of a similar outcome is very real.
On July 11, it was reported that Milwaukee and Trent had agreed to a fully guaranteed four-year, $64 million deal. The number raised eyebrows immediately, especially because Trent averaged just 8.1 points per game while shooting 38.7% from the field.
The deal looked even stranger when placed next to Trent’s recent contract history. He signed a one-year deal for the veteran minimum in 2024, then followed that with a two-year, $7.58 million contract in 2025. Only a few days later, ESPN’s Shams Charania reported that the NBA would investigate the Bucks’ deal.
Joe Vardon of The Athletic then dug into why the league is still looking closely at Milwaukee. One big difference from the Clippers case is that Los Angeles was found to have used outside employment contracts worth millions of dollars and extra benefits beyond Leonard’s basketball salary. Another is that the Clippers probe became public through the Pablo Torre Finds Out podcast, while the Bucks investigation has stayed much quieter.
Still, Vardon wrote that if league investigators uncover evidence of cap circumvention, Milwaukee could be looking at punishment that matches - or even exceeds - what the Clippers received.
"If league investigators find proof that the Bucks and Trent are guilty of what the Clippers and Leonard were guilty of, the punishment could be equally severe, if not worse," Vardon said. "The details that caught the NBA’s attention regarding Trent’s deal are this: Trent, 27, had signed two prior contracts for much less money with Milwaukee amid the previous two summers of 2024 and 2025 (including for the league minimum in 2024)."
Vardon also noted that Trent turned down player options on both of those deals, positioning himself for a bigger payday. He added that the timing of the new contract, which will pay Trent more than $15 million annually, stood out even more because it came after what he described as his worst statistical season since his rookie year.
"There were player options attached to both deals, and he declined them both, setting up larger paydays. Then, in the run-up to his new contract, which will pay him more than $15 million annually, he muddled through his worst statistical campaign since his rookie campaign from eight years ago."
At the center of the league’s inquiry is a simple question: did Milwaukee and Trent intentionally work through smaller, cheaper contracts so he could be rewarded later in a way that would run afoul of the NBA’s salary rules?
Vardon also pointed out that if Trent’s new deal had come at the start of free agency, rather than weeks later after the blockbuster trade that sent Giannis Antetokounmpo to Miami, the reaction around the league might have been very different. Rival executives, he wrote, would have mocked it after a mediocre season.
But because the contract surfaced after most teams had already spent most of their cap space, those same executives viewed Milwaukee as paying far above Trent’s value. The Bucks’ response to those rivals was that they believed in Trent’s market value and saw him as a $15 million-per-year player.
Milwaukee has been in this lane before. Bobby Portis, who was also traded to the Heat along with Antetokounmpo, signed two separate two-year deals with player options in 2021 and 2022, declined both, and then landed a four-year, $48 million contract in 2022 to remain with the Bucks. Trent’s path looks similar on the surface.
The key difference, as the source noted, is performance. Portis had a strong season before getting his longer deal, averaging 14.6 points and 9.1 rebounds while shooting 47.9% from the field and 39.3% from 3-point range. If Trent had produced like that, there likely would not be an investigation at all.
In Other News...
Brandon Ingram Now Looms Over The Clippers Biggest Season Question
Brandon Ingrams offseason has already become one of the more closely watched storylines around the Clippers, even before camp fully gets going. The forward had surgery to address a heel spur that bothered him late last season, a move designed to clean up an issue that clearly lingered and affected him when it mattered most.
What makes it tricky for the Clippers is the lack of a detailed update on where his recovery stands. The team is expected to be patient with his health and avoid pushing him into anything that could create a setback, which leaves his status for the upcoming season hanging over a roster that would like clarity, not another unanswered question. [Read more 🡒]
Clippers Offseason Looks Very Different Once The Kawhi Fallout Hits
Rui Hachimuras arrival on a two-year deal and the trade for Max Strus gave the Clippers a very different offseason look, the kind that suggests a front office trying to keep the roster moving in a new direction. Both moves came with a clearer basketball logic than splash, and both were easy enough to frame as wins for a team that has spent too long chasing the next fix.
The bigger shift, though, came when the franchise moved on from Kawhi Leonard in a deal with Toronto that reshaped the roster and draft stock around the margins. Even with the added pieces and picks, the Leonard era never really stopped casting a shadow over the Clippers planning, and the long-term cost of that chapter ended up being part of the conversation too. [Read more 🡒]
Clippers Kawhi Scandal Could Suddenly Feel Bigger Than L.A
The latest cap-related investigation hanging over the Bucks has a familiar shape for anyone around the Clippers. Milwaukees four-year, $64 million deal with Gary Trent Jr. is now being examined in connection with earlier, smaller agreements, with the question centering on whether the sides had a larger arrangement waiting in the wings. For Clippers fans, it is hard not to hear echoes of the Kawhi Leonard case, the one that put the franchise in the leagues crosshairs and turned a contract story into something much bigger.
What makes this one especially worth watching from Los Angeles is the potential scale of the fallout. If the Bucks are found to have skirted the rules, the penalties could be as severe as, or even worse than, what the Clippers endured, which is a reminder that these cases are not just about one player or one signing. They can reach deep into a teams reputation, its front office credibility, and the way the rest of the league views every move it makes from here. [Read more 🡒]