The Cavaliers’ February move for James Harden is looking even rougher now, and not just because the on-court payoff fell short of the hype.
Cleveland sent Darius Garland and a second-round pick to the LA Clippers to land Harden, betting on the short term and hoping it would push them to a title. Instead, the Cavs got as far as the Eastern Conference Finals for the first time since 2018, but the bigger cost may be what they gave up to make the deal happen.
According to Brian Windhorst of ESPN, Garland had a “years-long relationship” with LeBron James through their shared Klutch Sports ties, and Garland’s move to the Clippers affected the four-time MVP’s decision not to reunite with Cleveland. In other words, the Cavaliers didn’t just lose a young guard with real upside - they may have also shut the door on a LeBron homecoming.
James Harden being Cleveland’s guard affected LeBron’s decision to go to Philly, per @WindhorstESPN
“It's not that the Cavs having Harden was a factor, but rather who the Cavs did not have. To get Harden from the LA Clippers in February, the Cavs traded Darius Garland, a… pic.twitter.com/k8KqOHghUW
- SleeperHoops (@Sleeper_Hoops) July 25, 2026
That’s what makes the trade look so damaging in hindsight. Cleveland gave up a 26-year-old two-time All-Star who hadn’t reached his prime yet for a 36-year-old Harden with a postseason reputation that had already raised plenty of eyebrows. Even at the time, the deal looked like a win for the Clippers and a loss for the Cavaliers.
The results haven’t helped Cleveland’s case. Harden didn’t deliver the kind of impact the Cavs were chasing, while Garland flashed his value on the other side, turning in one of his best games of the year in the play-in tournament. For Lawrence Frank and the Clippers, that only reinforced how well they did to land him at the deadline.
And the long-term picture is even harsher. Cleveland is now committed to fully guaranteed $272 million over the next four seasons, and Harden still hasn’t been paid. The Cavs also need to re-sign him no matter what.
What started as a win-now swing in February now looks like a badly timed bet that cost Cleveland both flexibility and a chance at something bigger. It began with Garland, and the regret is only growing.
In Other News...
Clippers Just Saw A Needed Wing Solution Get More Complicated
The Clippers have been hunting for wing help, and Cam Johnson had looked like the kind of name that could fit both the roster and the market. A 30-year-old with a contract that could have made financial sense for Denver, Johnson offered a plausible path for a team trying to add size and shooting without overcomplicating the rest of its offseason.
Now that path is less clear. Johnsons production last season was solid enough to keep him on the radar, but his postseason struggles and the way Denver has handled trade interest have pushed the Clippers back toward the drawing board. If they are going to upgrade on the wing, they may have to pivot quickly and sort through a list of alternatives that does not offer many easy answers. [Read more 🡒]
Clippers May Be Pivoting To A Different Young Wing Target
The Clippers have spent much of the offseason looking for a young wing who can fit alongside their established playmakers, and Peyton Watson had been the name to watch for a while. Now Jonathan Kuminga has moved into that conversation, with the team reportedly exploring a sign-and-trade path that would bring in a different kind of athleticism and upside for a roster still trying to balance present-day contention with long-term flexibility.
Kumingas appeal is pretty clear from the Clippers side: he brings the kind of physical tools and developmental runway that can matter on a team trying to stay competitive without getting stale. His recent run with the Atlanta Hawks only adds to the intrigue, since it gives front offices another look at how he can function in a bigger role, and it leaves the Clippers weighing whether he is the better young wing bet as they continue sorting through their options. [Read more 🡒]