Justin Herbert Trade Talk Shows What Chargers Fans Are Really Debating

Despite speculation about potential draft pick returns, the Chargers are sticking with Justin Herbert for the long haul.

The idea of Justin Herbert leaving the Chargers may sound far-fetched, and Los Angeles has made it clear it does not want to go there. But the price tag being floated around the league is eye-popping: three future first-round picks.

That’s the package a rival executive reportedly believes the Chargers could get if they ever decided to shop Herbert, according to ESPN’s Adam Schefter, as shared by Evan Sidery on X. The same report notes that Los Angeles said it would not consider moving Herbert, who has a full no-trade clause in his contract.

Schefter said on The Adam Schefter Podcast that the executive he spoke with was a high-level league source. When he checked with someone in the Chargers organization, the response shut the door fast: “Let me be very clear about this: we have never even discussed that idea,” they were quoted as saying. They added that it “has never once been uttered in our organization, nor will it be.”

Schefter also said, “While others have debated whether Justin Herbert should be traded, the Chargers have not,”

Tom Pelissero had already reported that the Chargers had no near-term plans to trade Herbert.

The on-field results haven’t helped calm the noise. Los Angeles dropped to 0-5 after a 23-17 loss to Denver in Week 6.

Herbert has completed 59.4% of his passes for 937 yards and five touchdowns, but he also leads the NFL in interceptions through five games. The Chargers have gotten little relief from their receiving group, with no receiver catching more than one touchdown so far, and Herbert was sacked five times against the Broncos as the offensive line issues remained in plain view.

The schedule doesn’t give the Chargers much breathing room, either. They face Kansas City in Week 6 before a Week 7 bye.

Herbert signed a five-year, $262.5 million extension in 2023, a deal that runs through 2029 and includes that no-trade clause.

In Other News...

Chargers Collapse Is Putting Ownership Under A Brutal Spotlight

The Chargers 0-5 start has done more than wreck the early-season outlook in Los Angeles. It has sharpened every criticism around the operation, from coaching choices and on-field execution to the bigger question of whether the roster has been managed aggressively enough to keep pace with the rest of the league.

What makes the frustration linger is that this is not just about one bad month or a few close losses. Around the team, the conversation has drifted toward ownership and the broader budget approach, with the sense that the current path leaves little margin for improvement and even less patience for the people tasked with fixing it. [Read more 🡒]

Chargers Collapse Has Put An Unthinkable Justin Herbert Debate In Play

An 0-5 start has turned the Chargers season into something much bigger than a bad October, because the losing has now pushed the conversation from short-term fixes to the future of Justin Herbert. Los Angeles has spent heavily on coaching and player personnel around him, building the roster with the expectation that the quarterback would be the constant, the face of the franchise and the player everything else was supposed to support.

Justin Herbert is 28 and still under contract for four more years, which is why any talk of a reset still sounds jarring. Even so, the way this season has unraveled has left room for an uncomfortable question that did not exist when the year began: if the struggles keep going, could the Chargers eventually consider a much larger overhaul, one that changes the direction of the entire team? [Read more 🡒]

Chargers Fans Are Suddenly Stuck With A Justin Herbert Debate

The idea of Justin Herbert even entering trade chatter has already done what rumor seasons do best for the Chargers: it has turned a franchise quarterback into a topic of public argument. With the November 4 deadline in view, the speculation has centered on a hypothetical market so massive it would reshape any team that entertained it, and it has only sharpened the question of how a passer of Herberts caliber gets evaluated if the league ever truly opened the door.

For Chargers fans, the tension is less about whether the noise exists and more about what it says about the value attached to a player like Herbert. Several teams would surely line up if a deal were ever considered, but the organization has pushed back on the premise from the start, leaving the whole discussion in that uneasy space between rumor and reality. The debate is still alive, even if the Chargers have made clear they do not see it as one they need to have. [Read more 🡒]