Raiders 53-Man Roster Already Has Fans Debating A Few Surprising Calls

Despite efforts to revamp the team under new leadership, several notable players were surprisingly left off the Raiders' roster, highlighting key areas the franchise still needs to develop.

The Raiders’ first 53-man roster didn’t just reveal who made the cut. It also showed how Las Vegas is trying to balance immediate needs with long-term development as the Klint Kubiak era gets underway.

After months of workouts, practices and roster churn, the Raiders pared the group down from 90 players to 53 and turned the page toward Week 1 against the Miami Dolphins at home. General manager Spytek made it clear the work is far from finished.

"It's constant improvement. We all knew the date was coming to get to 53, and that was Sunday.

We made a lot of hard choices, and we've got a long way to go, a lot of work to do with a young roster. But I think we're all excited to go over the next week and a half and get a chance to play the Dolphins," Spytek said shortly after the Raiders solidified their initial 53-man roster.

The roster itself reflects where the Raiders are right now: young, still taking shape, and built with plenty of room for growth. Spytek said the organization is pushing to raise the level of every position group, and he pointed to the age of the room as part of the bigger picture.

“Well, we're always constantly trying to get every room better, and I know Klint [Kubiak] told you guys a week or two ago that more is expected of that room, but I would say every room more is expected, and we have a young room. I think the oldest guy in there is 27 years old, and so there's a lot of growth potential in that room still,” Spytek said.

“Even though some of the guys have played quite a bit of football, and we're committed to building the best team possible, and I respect those guys in that room with the way they work, and they know, and every position group knows that they have to bring their best every day, and they've got to do what's asked of them. We've got to win football games."

That context matters when looking at the so-called snubs from the initial roster. The players who missed the 53 didn’t simply disappear; they landed on the practice squad, where Las Vegas can keep developing them and still have the option to elevate them for Sundays if needed.

That setup is a key part of any rebuild, and especially one as extensive as the one the Raiders are undertaking. In that sense, the choices weren’t really a sign of missed evaluations so much as a reflection of how the front office and coaching staff are working in sync.

At cornerback, the Raiders clearly see the need for more help. Their secondary is young and unproven, and Vance needed more time to develop.

His size also worked against him. Even so, he’s a player the Raiders may call up on game days, and his progress in practice suggests he’s still very much part of the picture.

Linebacker is another spot where the Raiders could use more depth, even if the starters are already in place. McGrone showed enough during camp and preseason to make the conversation interesting, but he still fell short of the initial 53. The Raiders know the linebackers who made the roster better at this stage, though McGrone’s talent gives Las Vegas another developmental name worth tracking.

For now, the bigger takeaway is simple: the Raiders used roster cuts to keep flexibility, preserve upside and keep building around a young group that still has plenty of work ahead of it.

In Other News...

Raiders QB Plan Already Comes With One Big Problem

The Raiders have already settled one of the biggest questions of their 2026 offseason, and the answer comes with a familiar kind of comfort. Klint Kubiak is going with Kirk Cousins as the starter over rookie Fernando Mendoza and Aidan OConnell, banking on Cousins experience and leadership to steady a team that has spent too much time searching for stability under center.

But the move only makes sense if the protection holds up, and that is where the real concern starts to creep in. Las Vegas is still dealing with questions along the offensive line, and if that group cannot keep the pocket clean, the safer long-term bet may wind up being Mendoza anyway, especially if the Raiders want a quarterback who can grow with whatever comes next. [Read more 🡒]

Raiders Get Encouraging Ashton Jeanty Update Before A Big Backfield Decision

Ashton Jeantys sprained ankle has been trending in the right direction since Aug. 23, and the early read out of his recovery is enough to keep the Raiders optimistic heading into opening week. ESPNs Adam Schefter reported that Jeanty is on track to potentially be available for the season opener against the Miami Dolphins, a development that matters not just because of his health, but because of what he was expected to bring to Las Vegas offense right away.

Mike Washington Jr. made a strong enough impression in the preseason to complicate the backfield picture, and the Raiders now have a decision to make if Jeanty is ready in time. The possibility of a timeshare would give the staff options, but it also puts a spotlight on how quickly Jeanty can get back to full strength and whether the team wants to ease him in or lean on the rookie duo from the start. [Read more 🡒]

Raiders Offensive Staff Overhaul Says Everything About Last Seasons Problems

The Raiders offseason work on offense has pointed back to one of the biggest reasons last season went sideways: the line never stabilized, and the coaching behind it drew harsh internal reviews. Las Vegas answered by bringing in Rick Dennison to coach the offensive line, a move aimed at tightening up fundamentals and technique after a year in which the units performance never really settled into place.

Mike Sullivans arrival as quarterbacks coach adds another layer to the reset, giving the staff a veteran voice with plenty of NFL experience and a prior working relationship with offensive coordinator Kubiak. It is the kind of staff reshaping that tells you the Raiders did not view last seasons offensive problems as a matter of one bad stretch or one injured player, but as something deeper that needed a full coaching rethink. [Read more 🡒]