Maxx Crosby’s sack total is the number everyone keeps staring at. The problem is that it barely tells the story.
Through six games, Crosby has only two sacks, and that’s helped fuel the trade-deadline noise around the Raiders’ edge rusher. But his pressure production has been strong enough to land him among the league leaders in a much better indicator of what he’s actually doing: quarterback hits.
Crosby has 15 of them, tied for third in the NFL with Houston’s Will Anderson Jr. Only Buffalo’s Greg Rousseau, with 19, and Denver’s Zach Allen, with 16, have more.
That’s the part that matters. Crosby is getting to quarterbacks. They’re just getting rid of the ball a beat before he can finish the play.
The Raiders’ recent skid has only kept the chatter alive. Las Vegas opened 3-0, then lost three straight, falling 30-27 to Kansas City, 45-17 at New England and 33-30 to Buffalo. In each of those defeats, the defense gave up at least 30 points.
After the loss in New England, CBS Sports’ Pete Prisco pushed the idea that Las Vegas should deal Crosby: “Shouldn’t you consider trading [Maxx] Crosby again? Because I would.
Because I don’t think he’s part of the future.” He suggested Jacksonville as a possible landing spot.
As PFN noted, that was his opinion, not a report that talks were actually happening.
Earlier, after the Kansas City loss, Jason La Canfora wrote that if a rival put two first-round picks on the table, it “might catch Las Vegas’ attention,” and he quoted one general manager saying, “I don’t think the price comes down.” La Canfora’s own takeaway was: “Ultimately, I expect him to stay put” (via Yardbarker).
That two-firsts figure has a real precedent. In March, the Raiders agreed to send Crosby to Baltimore for two first-round picks, but the Ravens backed out after his medical evaluation following a winter meniscus repair, and the trade was never made official.
The deadline itself is Tuesday, Nov. 10, at 3 p.m. CT.
If you want to know why the sack column lags behind the hit total, the week-by-week breakdown says plenty. Crosby has logged three hits against Miami, one against the Chargers, two against New Orleans, five against Kansas City, two at New England and two against Buffalo.
His sacks came in the opener, when he had 1.5, and he added a half-sack against Kansas City. He hasn’t recorded one since.
And it’s not just a Crosby issue. The Raiders have 43 quarterback hits as a team, sixth in the league, but only 15 sacks, which ranks 13th.
They’re getting the quarterback uncomfortable. They’re not finishing often enough.
That’s why hits matter here. Sacks depend on things a pass rusher can’t fully control - how quickly the quarterback throws, whether he steps up, whether another defender gets there first. Hits are the better read on whether the rush is actually working, and they also start messing with a quarterback’s timing.
Crosby has also shown before that a slow start in the sack column doesn’t mean much in October. In 2021, he had 5.0 sacks through six weeks and still finished with 8.0.
The trade question, though, is a different animal. History says the market for this kind of edge rusher can be strong, but Crosby’s last two-firsts valuation came in the offseason, with years left on his deal and a much broader team-building window attached.
Von Miller is the obvious deadline comparison. Before Denver dealt him in 2021, he had 32.5 sacks and 69 quarterback hits across his last three full seasons.
Crosby, from 2023-25, has 32.0 sacks and 71 QB hits. But Miller was 32, in the final year of his deal, and the Broncos sent him to the Rams for 2022 second- and third-round picks while also paying $9 million of the $9.7 million left on his salary.
Chandler Jones offers another point of reference. Before Arizona acquired him in 2016, he had 30.0 sacks from 2013-15 and was entering the final year of his rookie contract at $7.79 million. The Patriots sent him to the Cardinals for guard Jonathan Cooper and a second-round pick in March.
Neither deal came close to two firsts. That’s the difference between an expiring contract and Crosby’s situation.
He’s signed through 2029 on a three-year, $106.5 million extension, with an average of $35.5 million and $91.5 million in practical guarantees. His 2026 base salary is $30 million.
That contract cuts both ways. A team trading for Crosby would be on the hook for the next three years unless Las Vegas covered part of the money, the way Denver did with Miller. The Raiders would only be left with the prorated bonus money already on their books, about $5.1 million in dead money.
So yes, the sack total looks light. But the underlying production says the pressure is real, and that’s what teams will see when they call. If the Raiders move him now, they’re probably not getting the kind of package they’d get when the market is cleaner and the production is easier to sell.
For now, Crosby’s numbers say one thing, and the rumors say another. The hits suggest the sacks are on the way. The trade market may not wait around for that to show up.
In Other News...
Raiders Trade Deadline Could Decide Their Biggest Weakness
The Raiders have spent the offseason reshaping their roster, but one of the old issues is still hanging around. Las Vegas has seen signs of progress up front, yet the offensive line remains a concern as the season moves along, and it has become the clearest area where the front office could still make a difference.
Offensive coordinator Andrew Janocko has stressed the staffs detailed, incremental approach to the unit, focusing on small weekly gains rather than treating the line like a finished product. That leaves the trade deadline as a meaningful checkpoint for the Raiders, who have to decide whether to keep developing the current group or look for a move that could stabilize the interior and give the offense a better chance to hold up. [Read more 🡒]
Raiders Could Have A Trade Deadline Chance They Can't Ignore
At 3-3, Las Vegas is squarely in the middle of the AFC picture but also close enough to the edge to treat the November 10 trade deadline like a real decision point. The Raiders have already given themselves reason to think about adding help, and one name that keeps surfacing is Indianapolis defensive tackle DeForest Buckner, a veteran lineman who could give the front a much-needed boost if the right deal materializes.
Buckner also fits the kind of conversation that tends to follow a deadline with stakes: he is in a contract year, he has the resume to draw interest, and the asking price would not be limited to money alone. For the Raiders, the question is whether a move that improves the defense now is worth the draft capital it would take to get it done, especially with other teams expected to be involved before the clock runs out. [Read more 🡒]
Raiders Week 7 Decisions Could Say A Lot About Their Trade Deadline
The Raiders Week 7 roster picture could end up telling a lot about what they plan to do before the NFL trade deadline. A recent change at right guard, where Caleb Rogers moved into the starting role, only adds to the sense that Las Vegas is still sorting out its line and evaluating how pieces fit as the season moves deeper into October. At the same time, the backfield is thinning with Mike Washington Jr. dealing with foot and back injuries, and that could open a path for undrafted rookie Roman Hemby if Washington is unavailable.
There is also pressure building at receiver, where Jack Bech and Donte Thornton Jr. are getting closer to returns from injured reserve. Thorntons timetable in particular gives the Raiders little room to drag out the decision, and the approaching deadline only makes the roster math more interesting. Between the reshuffling up front, the injury situations and the possible reinforcements on the way, Week 7 may be less about one game plan and more about what Las Vegas thinks it needs for the stretch ahead. [Read more 🡒]