In the wake of Jerome Tang's dismissal from the Kansas State basketball program, the conversation hasn't quieted down. Despite being let go for cause, Tang continues to receive public support from those within the program.
The former coach, who was fired on February 15, is now pursuing his $18.675 million buyout with the help of high-profile attorneys. The university cited a "public disrepute and embarrassment" clause in Tang's contract, pointing to a viral postgame press conference following a loss to Cincinnati on February 11 as the tipping point.
While the legal battle looms, many sports law experts anticipate a settlement between Tang and Kansas State. Should the case go to court, the Wildcats' ongoing praise for Tang could potentially bolster his position.
Paul H. Haagan, a noted Professor of Law and co-Director for Sports Law and Policy at Duke University, suggests that genuine support from the team might aid Tang's case if they testify.
Interim coach Matthew Driscoll has consistently mentioned Tang in his postgame press conferences since the firing, emphasizing the impact Tang had on the team. Players, including PJ Haggerty, have also voiced their dedication to playing the remainder of the season in honor of their former coach.
Driscoll pointed to the Wildcats' resilience, particularly following their February 14 loss to Houston, as a testament to Tang's influence. Despite a 1-2 record since the press conference incident, Driscoll credits Tang for instilling a renewed effort in the team.
Haagan notes that as long as Driscoll and others are not coordinating with Tang's legal team, their comments should not negatively impact the coach's case. However, if these remarks were intended to undermine athletic director Gene Taylor, the situation could shift.
There's also a question of why Driscoll and others are permitted to speak in ways that might affect Kansas State's position negatively. Driscoll's contract, which expires on April 30, includes a clause about representing the university positively. The Big 12's requirements for postgame comments add another layer of complexity.
Haagan highlights the delicate balance athletic departments must maintain between free speech and contractual obligations, noting that educational institutions often navigate these waters differently than businesses.
As the Wildcats prepare for their final regular-season games and the Big 12 Tournament, the situation remains fluid. They are set to face TCU on February 28, with the support for Tang still echoing through the program.