The Colts’ Daniel Jones chatter keeps circling back to the same simple problem: there’s no obvious reason another team should be eager to jump in.
With the NFL trade deadline set for November 10, Indianapolis could be looking at a Week 9 game that ends up being one of the last for a few current Colts. Jones is one of the names in that mix, but the logic behind a deal is shaky at best. From the outside, the first question is always the same: why would anyone trade for him?
Jones is in his eighth season, and the résumé isn’t exactly begging for a bidding war. His career quarterback rating sits at 85.0, and his touchdown-to-interception ratio is 94-64.
In 2026, the numbers have gotten even uglier. He has five touchdown passes, nine interceptions and a 68.7 quarterback rating.
Some of that can be tied to the Colts missing the explosive Alec Pierce, but that only goes so far. A quarterback with real juice is supposed to survive losing one weapon.
Jones hasn’t done that. He has been throwing up the kind of passes that leave everyone wondering, “What was he thinking?”
At this point, he could easily have 13 or more interceptions, because several would-be picks have already hit the turf. The same can’t be said for would-be touchdowns.
That’s why a move involving Jones makes more sense as an Indianapolis decision than as a market-driven one. The Colts need to get out from under the quarterback, not convince someone else to take him on as a prize. If anything, any return at all would be a win because it would bring back draft assets for a team that needs to rebuild.
There’s also the contract side of it. If the Colts release or trade Jones, they would save $38 million in 2027.
That money matters whether he stays or goes, because he isn’t going to be the answer for high-end success in Indianapolis. Saving that cash would give the team room to bring in a veteran quarterback who could bridge the gap to the next long-term option.
The catch, of course, is that any team trading for Jones would also be taking on what his contract pays him in 2027. That only sharpens the same question: why would a team do that? Jones hasn’t shown enough to justify it, even if his representation, Athletes First, has done a great job getting him paid.
Still, a trade remains a tough sell. Jones’ play and his contract make the whole thing complicated, and Shane Steichen would hate to lose a player he admires so much.
In Other News...
Colts Trade Deadline Could Open A Bigger Role For One Young Playmaker
With the NFL trade deadline drawing closer, the Colts find themselves in the same waiting game facing a lot of teams around the league: if a veteran moves out, a younger player may suddenly inherit a much bigger slice of the offense. That is the kind of ripple effect that makes this time of year so intriguing, especially for clubs trying to balance immediate expectations with the need to see what they have in their younger talent.
One of the names to watch in that conversation is Seth McGowan, who could be positioned for a larger role if the Colts make a move that changes the depth chart in front of him. For now, it remains a speculative setup rather than a certainty, but that is exactly what gives the deadline its edge for Indianapolis, where a single transaction could quickly alter the path for a young playmaker waiting for his chance. [Read more 🡒]
Anthony Richardson Just Got One Last Chance To Change Everything
Anthony Richardson is back on the field this season after recovering from the orbital fracture that sidelined him, and the former No. 4 pick has made it clear how much the chance to play again has meant to him. Even with the uncertainty that followed the injury, Richardson has taken the field with a sense of gratitude, trying to make the most of an opportunity that once looked far from guaranteed.
For the Colts, though, the bigger picture still hangs over every snap. The team has not fully committed to Richardson as its long-term answer, which leaves his future as unsettled as ever even as he works to reestablish himself. After all the promise, the injury, and the questions that followed, this season feels like a crucial stretch for Richardson to show the organization it should keep building around him. [Read more 🡒]
Colts Fans May Not Get The Downs Family Matchup They Wanted
The injury reports for Indianapolis and Dallas added a layer to a matchup that already had some extra family intrigue, but it may not deliver the Downs-on-Downs moment some fans had circled. Both teams listed players who did not practice or were limited ahead of the game, and the Cowboys report included rookie safety Caleb Downs, whose availability is now in question.
On the Colts side, Josh Downs has been part of the conversation for a different reason after requesting a trade, even as he said he is ready to go for the upcoming game against Dallas. For Indianapolis fans, the appeal of this week was obvious: a chance to watch one Downs in blue and another in Cowboys colors, with the added wrinkle of a roster situation that could keep the matchup from fully materializing. [Read more 🡒]