Curt Cignetti didn’t have much interest in dressing up Indiana’s 52-16 win over North Texas. The scoreboard was lopsided, the opener was in the books, and the head coach made it clear there was plenty to sort through anyway.
After the game Saturday afternoon at Memorial Stadium, Cignetti pointed first to the heat, then to the injuries, then to the uneven stretches on defense. He said he’d heard the heat index was 152, called that a reading he’d “never heard of in my life,” and added that the people who gave him the number thought it was accurate.
“It’s good to win. There will be a lot of critiques, for sure.”
Indiana did enough offensively to put the game away, but Cignetti didn’t sugarcoat the rest. He said both corners went down in the first quarter and would return, calling those injuries non-long-term issues. He also said Khobie Martin, whom he described as a starter, could be out “for a little bit.”
Defensively, Cignetti said the Hoosiers were not sharp. He described the unit as having a “soft balance,” citing poor tackling and trouble on the perimeter. He also noted that with a first game and a new staff on the other sideline, Indiana was seeing offensive looks it had not prepared for.
Offense, though, had the explosive answers. Cignetti said Indiana hit big plays, got solid special teams work, and made noise in the kickoff return game. He also said the passing game was “decent.”
One of the biggest positives was quarterback Josh Hoover’s day. Cignetti said Hoover played well, finished 13 of 16 with four touchdowns and no turnovers, and took a hit that left him bleeding before staying in and throwing a touchdown.
“That’s a good point and a good question,” Cignetti said when asked about Hoover’s toughness. He added that he didn’t initially see the hit, but later saw the aftermath on a tablet.
“I thought he played well. Like, I’m sure he earned the respect of his teammates based on his performance today.
He’s a veteran. I’m glad he had a good opener.”
The connection between Hoover and his receivers showed up early and often. Cignetti said Charlie had been a frequent target since Hoover arrived, and noted that North Texas “had a problem covering Charlie today, for sure.” He also mentioned that Indiana left some plays on the field, while Nick Marsh made a strong play on the first touchdown, Tyler Morris made several catches, and Davion Chandler got involved as well.
“Now he’s not supposed to spike the ball. Trying to look for reasons to play him; he’s giving me reasons not to. I mean, that’s youth (smiling).”
Cignetti said he did not alter his game plan because of the weather. He also praised the efficiency of Hoover’s day, saying the quarterback had open options, delivered the ball, and mostly had protection aside from one hit in which Hoover flipped the protection and probably should not have.
“The throw to Charlie for the touchdown wasn’t a really good throw,” Cignetti said, explaining that Charlie was so open Hoover still completed it. “That’s why I was so happy the next series, he cut that loose to Chaz, then a really good throw on the touchdown to Chandler. I thought he played really well, so…”
He also noted that Indiana’s efficiency was tied to the kind of game it became, with North Texas making it hard to get off the field and Indiana leaning on big offensive plays. In his view, not every game will look like this one.
On the ground, Indiana’s rushing output was not the centerpiece for much of the afternoon. Cignetti said he would need to see the tape before offering a real assessment of the run game, though he did describe one early sequence where North Texas showed five defensive linemen and caught Indiana off guard. Later, he said the passing game was clearly where the biggest chunks came from.
Before Grant’s long run, Indiana was under 100 rushing yards, and Cignetti said the offense used the run when it needed to control the ball and the clock. Still, he didn’t hide his view that the pass game carried the day.
He also said Indiana talked before kickoff about starting better than it did last year, when ODU scored on the first play of the game. This time, the Hoosiers opened with a kick return and a touchdown pass to Marsh.
“We did. We just didn’t play quite as well in between, the rest of the first quarter like we did last year.”
Cignetti closed by saying he didn’t see the new sign in the south end zone, though he heard it was being put up while the team was in the locker room. He said he knew Indiana had won it last year and added, “It was fun (laughter).”
Then he circled back to the way the game unfolded, saying the early offensive plan was disrupted when North Texas came out with five defensive linemen on the first play. Indiana adjusted, chipped away, and eventually leaned into the passing game and the clock.
“I didn’t like that. Although I was responsible for the first screen. I’ll take responsibility for that.”
In Other News...
Pacers Zubac Trade Just Got Even Harder To Defend
The Pacers decision to send a 2026 first-round pick and other assets to the Clippers for Ivica Zubac and Kobe Brown already had the look of a move worth revisiting, and the back end of the deal has only made it more complicated. What was once a simple future-pick transaction has turned into a reminder of how much draft capital can change hands in the NBA long before anyone knows exactly what it will be worth.
Now the leagues punishment of the Clippers for salary-cap violations tied to Kawhi Leonard has added another layer, because one of the first-rounders lost in the penalty package was the 2029 pick that originally came from Indiana. The Pacers will not get that pick back, and with it gone from the draft altogether, the trade sits in an even tougher spot to justify from Indianas side. [Read more 🡒]
