Five months later, people are still trying to shrink what Indiana pulled off in 2025. That’s the wrong fight to pick.
The latest version came from the Notre Dame side, when Tyler Horka of On3 argued that unless IU keeps stacking national title runs, the championship would be easy to move on from, while a Notre Dame title would land like the “Yankees or Cowboys ending their title droughts.” That comparison didn’t exactly pass the smell test.
If Indiana never gets back to that level over the next few years, the 2025 run only gets more vivid. It was a first-time national championship in a sport that hadn’t seen one since 1996 Florida, and IU went 16-0 for the first time since 1894 Yale.
That’s not a flash in the pan. That’s a season people will be talking about for a long time.
And the scale of it mattered everywhere Indiana went. The Hoosiers owned the crowd in all three Playoff games, including the title game in Miami’s home stadium.
That part gets overlooked in the easy-dismissal talk. You can make the case that Notre Dame draws more fans outside its own alumni base, sure.
But Indiana still took over neutral sites in a way that said plenty about how far that season traveled.
The broader point is even bigger. In the NIL and transfer portal era, college football kept wondering whether new blood would actually break through.
Ohio State’s 2024 title, the first in the 12-team Playoff era, didn’t exactly open the floodgates. It was a loaded roster finding the path that was available.
Indiana’s run was different. The Hoosiers used the new roster-building world in their own way and turned it into a perfect season.
That’s why the coaching piece matters, too. Watching a 60-something coach take over a program with more losses than anybody in the sport’s history and then rip off a perfect season in Year 2 is the kind of thing that sticks.
Maybe Indiana won’t become a regular fixture at the top. Maybe this was the one wild ride.
But even if that’s true, the ripple effect could still be huge for downtrodden programs looking at what’s possible.
None of that is meant to dismiss Notre Dame. The Irish have been chasing their first national title since 1988, they’ve gone 34-7 over the last three seasons, they’ve finished in the top 10 twice in that span, and one of those years included a Playoff win against IU. For plenty of college football fans, a Notre Dame title would absolutely be a major story of the 2020s, the way Michigan’s ended drought in 2023 was.
But Indiana’s season was its own monster. The title game drew 30.1 million viewers, making it the most-watched college football game in 11 years and the most-watched non-NFL sporting event since the Cubs beat the Cleveland Indians in Game 7 of the 2016 World Series.
That was a 36% jump from the 22.1 million who watched Notre Dame-Ohio State for the previous championship. So yes, the numbers were massive.
The story was bigger.
And some moments felt like they came straight out of a movie, especially Fernando Mendoza’s touchdown run. That’s part of why this whole gatekeeping exercise feels so off. Indiana’s 2025 title was too strange, too loud, and too fun to be filed away as something easily forgotten.
In Other News...
IU Fans Wont Like Why This Bloomington Arrest Is Raising Eyebrows
A June 22 arrest in Bloomington has drawn attention around Indiana University after police said a woman pointed an unloaded firearm at three cyclists near Second Street and College Avenue. Officers responded after witness reports and video evidence surfaced, and the case quickly moved from a tense street encounter to a formal criminal matter.
The arrest led to charges of intimidation with a deadly weapon and pointing an unloaded firearm at another person, and the suspect was taken to Monroe County Jail. For IU fans, the detail that makes this especially hard to ignore is how close the incident landed to campus life and downtown traffic, turning an ordinary stretch of city pavement into the latest uneasy headline connected to the programs broader community. [Read more 🡒]
Trent Sisley Could Decide More Than Fans Realize For Indiana
Indianas 2026-27 roster has been constructed mostly through the transfer portal, which makes Trent Sisley a little more important than a typical returning sophomore. He is the lone holdover from last season, and after an uneven freshman year he enters the offseason as more than just a familiar name. He has also added weight and looks more comfortable in the system, two quiet signs that his role could grow if the development keeps trending the right way.
The frontcourt picture still points first to Aiden Sherrell and Samet Yigitoglu, leaving Sisley in line for rotational minutes rather than centerpiece status. Even so, his place in the mix could matter more than it seems at first glance, because Indiana does not have many returning pieces to lean on and every bit of growth from a player who already knows the program helps settle a roster that is otherwise being remade. The question now is whether his offseason progress turns into the kind of dependable production that earns a steadier place in the rotation. [Read more 🡒]
Big Ten Rival Just Validated What Indiana Fans Believe About This Staff
Indianas rise under Curt Cignetti has already turned plenty of heads around the Big Ten, but it still carries a different kind of weight when the praise comes from a rival coach. Illinois coach Bret Bielema recently singled out offensive coordinator Mike Shanahan and defensive coordinator Bryant Haines as elite operators, the sort of assistants who help explain why the Hoosiers have looked so organized on both sides of the ball. He also pointed to Cignettis steadiness and the way Indiana has managed to keep its staff intact as a big reason the program has kept moving forward.
That kind of continuity is part of the story Indiana fans have been talking about for a while, especially with Shanahan and Haines sticking around through multiple raises and expected to be back in 2026 after long runs alongside Cignetti. Bielema also gave a nod to former Wisconsin assistant Bob Bostad for helping shape Indianas work in the trenches, another reminder that the Hoosiers growth has been built methodically rather than overnight. For a program still trying to prove its staying power, hearing a rival validate the staff may matter just as much as any scoreboard. [Read more 🡒]