No. 6 Indiana heads to Ann Arbor on Saturday with more than just a rebound opportunity in front of it. The Hoosiers are trying to move past their first loss since December 2024, and the trip to face Michigan at noon comes with two big questions hanging over the game: can Indiana get its run game going again, and how exactly will it handle the Wolverines’ quarterback situation?
Michigan enters at 4-2, with both losses coming against Big Ten teams by six points or fewer. Last week, the Wolverines made a change under center, replacing Bryce Underwood with Tommy Carr, and then went on to beat Penn State 21-18 on the road. That switch has added a layer of uncertainty Indiana is preparing for all week.
“They’ll be feeling pretty good about themselves after that victory,” Indiana head coach Curt Cignetti said on Monday. “It will be a very physical football game again, our eighth game in a row. So looking forward, not backward, and this will be a very tough challenge.”
The biggest issue for Indiana may be whether its ground game can regain its rhythm against a Michigan defense that has been better at stopping the run than Nebraska or Ohio State. Indiana is averaging 200.1 rushing yards per game, second in the Big Ten when non-conference games are included, but Nebraska and No. 4 Ohio State each held the Hoosiers under 80 rushing yards in the last two weeks.
That has forced Indiana to find other ways to move the ball, and those alternatives have looked anything but routine. Against Nebraska, the Hoosiers pulled off a comeback with two fourth-quarter touchdowns that came in unusual fashion.
First, Josh Hoover hit Nick Marsh on a pass, and Marsh slipped away from his defender and raced to the end zone. Then Indiana used heavy personnel as part of a disguise, hiding Marsh on the line before he popped open for the go-ahead score.
It worked. But it also showed just how much Indiana had to lean on creativity and receiver play to survive.
A week later against Ohio State, that approach didn’t produce enough. Indiana’s only points before the fourth quarter came on a 7-yard drive set up by an interception, and while the defense created two takeaways, the offense never settled into a consistent rhythm or sustained drives into the red zone.
“I thought we protected well, it would be nice to get some explosive runs going again, but we had a couple drives where we got some nice runs,” Cignetti said about the run game against Ohio State.
The challenge only gets steeper in Ann Arbor. Michigan allows 89.7 rushing yards per game, better than Nebraska’s 99.6 and Ohio State’s 92.9. If Indiana can’t lean on the run, it may have to win almost entirely through the air - something that feels possible, but hardly ideal.
Still, that ground attack is supposed to be the engine. Indiana has enough talent around Hoover, but the last two weeks have shown how quickly the offense can become dependent on one-off plays or unusual circumstances. If the Hoosiers want to stay on the path they were on earlier in the year, the run game has to look more like itself.
The other major issue is who Indiana will be chasing around on defense. Michigan’s quarterback picture shifted last week when the Wolverines went with Carr after a scoreless first half. Carr completed 5 of 7 passes for 47 yards and ran four times for 36 yards and a touchdown, helping spark the 21-18 win at Penn State.
Carr is expected to start against Indiana, though Cignetti made it clear the Hoosiers are bracing for the possibility of more than one look.
“Could be two quarterbacks on the field at the same time,” Cignetti said. “That would not surprise me… and (Carr) can make plays, so schematically they didn’t change a whole lot in the second half.”
That’s part of what makes this matchup tricky. Indiana isn’t just preparing for one quarterback; it may have to handle two different players with different styles. Underwood ranks No. 3 among Big Ten quarterbacks in rushing yards per attempt, and Carr already flashed his mobility with a strong speed-option touchdown last week.
Indiana defensive lineman Tyrique Tucker said Tuesday the Hoosiers are readying themselves for whichever version of Michigan shows up.
“(Carr), he was pretty good for them,” Tucker said, “so we’ll see who they put in at quarterback, but ultimately it’s on us to prepare. Just mentally prepare, physically prepare our bodies to get ready for whatever they’re going to throw at us.”
The last time Indiana dealt with a dangerous running quarterback, it found a way to survive. Nebraska’s Anthony Colandrea, the conference leader in quarterback rush yards per attempt, ran 17 times for 47 yards and a touchdown against the Hoosiers.
That’s the standard Indiana needs again, especially with Michigan’s ability to keep things unsettled at quarterback and stay dangerous on third down. If the Hoosiers can contain that part of the game, they give themselves a real shot at leaving Ann Arbor with a result that would help them reset after the first loss in 22 games.
A win would steady the season and point Indiana toward a brighter stretch. A loss would change the mood fast.
For a team trying to regain its footing, Saturday feels like one of those games where nearly everything matters.
In Other News...
Ryan Day Is Still Complaining About How Indiana Defended Jeremiah Smith
Curt Cignetti had plenty to point to after Indianas narrow loss to Ohio State, especially the way the Hoosiers handled Jeremiah Smith. On his weekly radio show, Cignetti credited the defensive plan for keeping the standout receiver in check, noting the mix of double teams and pressure on the quarterback that helped limit Smith to a season-low 68 yards.
Ryan Day, for his part, acknowledged the challenge Indiana presented but still came away sounding irritated by the way the game was officiated. On his own weekly radio show after Ohio States 19-15 win over Indiana, Day said he felt Smith was impacted by uncalled penalties, adding another layer to a game that already drew plenty of attention for how the Hoosiers defended one of college footballs most dangerous targets. [Read more 🡒]
Indiana Offense Faces A Huge Opening In Ann Arbor
Ann Arbor is shaping up as one of those early-season tests where both offenses arrive with more questions than answers, and Indiana has a real chance to make the matchup uncomfortable. The Hoosiers have leaned on quarterback Josh Hoover and receiver Charlie Becker to keep their attack moving, while Michigan is turning to true freshman Tommy Carr after making a change at quarterback, a reminder that neither side is settled heading into this one.
For Indiana, the opening may be there if it can exploit the Wolverines uncertainty while also finding a little more balance of its own. Both teams have had issues getting their rushing and passing games where they want them, so the margin could come down to which defense holds up better, with Isaiah Jones anchoring Indiana and Troy Bowles leading Michigan. The setup leaves plenty of room for one side to seize control early, and plenty of reason to think this one could turn on a small handful of plays. [Read more 🡒]
Indiana Has Two Growing Concerns Before Michigan
Indianas unbeaten run is gone, but the bigger issue coming out of the Ohio State loss was how uneven the Hoosiers looked in the areas that usually travel well in November. There were bright spots to point to, especially Amare Ferrells interceptions on defense and Charlie Beckers production in the passing game, yet the overall picture still left the kind of questions that tend to linger when a top team takes a hit.
The running game never quite found enough traction, and that matters even more with Michigan next on the schedule. So does the kicking situation, after Nico Radicic missed field goals in the loss. Indiana has enough good tape to keep confidence intact, but the Hoosiers also have a couple of clear fixes to sort out before the next test arrives. [Read more 🡒]