Indianas New-Look Roster Is Built For A Big Ten Problem

Indiana men's basketball seeks to redefine itself with increased physicality and size to strengthen their competitiveness in the Big Ten.

Indiana’s roster makeover has given Darian DeVries something he didn’t have a year ago: a team built to take the bumps that come with Big Ten basketball.

After a first season in charge, DeVries went looking for more size, length and versatility, and Indiana responded with a transfer haul that changed the look of the Hoosiers almost immediately. Seven newcomers arrived, including three players listed at 7-foot or taller, and the result is a group DeVries believes is built on a different foundation.

“Physical, tough, gritty,” DeVries said. “That’s what we have to be.”

That shift was driven by what went wrong last season. Indiana averaged 32.4 rebounds per game, sixth-lowest in the Big Ten, and often found itself outmuscled on the glass.

Tucker DeVries led the team with just 5.3 rebounds per game, while Sam Alexis ranked second at 4.8. The Hoosiers also didn’t have much margin for error offensively.

When Lamar Wilkerson or Tucker DeVries was off, the scoring options thinned out fast.

“If we weren’t making threes, there weren’t a whole lot of places we could get to offensively,” DeVries said during Big Ten Media Days on Thursday in Rosemont, Illinois.

Indiana still managed to stay in games by leaning on volume perimeter shooting, but the shortcomings showed up often enough to force a reset. Wilkerson averaged 20.9 points per game on 46.3% shooting and 37.8% from three-point range, while Tucker DeVries added 13.7 points across 32 games. They were the only Hoosiers to finish in double figures.

The problems weren’t limited to one end. Indiana allowed 72.2 points per game, a number that ranked 129th nationally, and the front line frequently had trouble matching up with bigger Big Ten opponents. Freshman center Andrej Acimovic and senior forward Reed Bailey, both 6-foot-10, were the tallest players on the roster, but Acimovic never appeared in a game and Bailey averaged only 3.4 rebounds.

That pushed DeVries to reshape the group through the portal. He said the league’s physical demands left no wiggle room.

“The Big Ten from a physicality standpoint is as physical of a league as there is in the country,” DeVries said. “You have to be able to match that.”

Indiana’s new frontcourt is meant to do exactly that. Junior center Samet Yigitoglu and junior forward Aiden Sherrell give the Hoosiers more flexibility inside and, in DeVries’ view, improve the team’s interior defense. Sherrell, who transferred from Alabama, said daily battles in practice have already helped him adjust.

“Just competing against those guys every day has helped,” Sherrell said. “Like, in the Big Ten, I’ll definitely see a lot of solid guys. So, just getting a lot of reps, that helps a lot.”

DeVries has also been pushing the offensive glass, an area he believes can create extra possessions and easier scoring chances when shots aren’t falling. And even with all the size added, Indiana still has the kind of shooters that fit DeVries’ system.

He described former Notre Dame point guard and senior Markus Burton’s midrange game as his “superpower.” Former Duke guard and junior Darren Harris has the “green light from anywhere.”

Senior guard Bryce Lindsay, who has spent time at Texas A&M, James Madison and Villanova, is a proven outside threat after shooting 37.7% from three over his career and averaging 12.3 points last season at Villanova. Sherrell can stretch defenses too, having shot 33.8% from beyond the arc last season with Alabama.

DeVries called Sherrell the “perfect fit” for the system.

The pieces are different now, and so is the profile. Indiana no longer looks like a team trying to survive with shot-making alone. It looks built to lean into its size, absorb contact and still threaten from all three levels.

In Other News...

Indiana's Ohio State Showdown Just Got An Extra Reason To Sting

Indianas Week 7 meeting with Ohio State already had the feel of a national spotlight game, with two top-ranked teams and recent champions set to collide in Bloomington. It is the kind of matchup that usually draws every possible camera, bus and broadcast personality, especially when a program like Indiana has a chance to host one of the sports biggest brands on its own field.

Instead, the pregame stage will be elsewhere. ESPNs College GameDay is headed to Provo for Notre Dames trip to BYU, leaving Memorial Stadium without the show that so often signals college footballs biggest Saturday. For Indiana, it adds a little more edge to an already massive showdown, with the Hoosiers still left to prove their place in a game plenty of people expected to be impossible to ignore. [Read more 🡒]

Curt Cignetti Saw One Indiana Problem That Nearly Cost Them

Indianas perfect start survived a tense road test at Nebraska, where the Hoosiers dug out of a double-digit fourth-quarter hole and left Lincoln with a 20-17 win to move to 6-0. Curt Cignetti did not hide from how close it came, acknowledging that his team spent too much of the night battling itself before finding enough answers to pull it out.

The encouraging part for Indiana is that the resilience showed up when it mattered, with key plays helping flip the game late and keep the unbeaten run intact. Still, Cignetti pointed to one area that needs work, saying the rushing attack has to get better as the staff goes back through the film and sorts out what nearly cost the Hoosiers a victory. [Read more 🡒]

Curt Cignetti Gave Hoosiers Fans A Brutal New Debate Against Nebraska

Indianas offense spent most of the afternoon looking nothing like the version Curt Cignetti has built in Bloomington, and the frustration had already spilled over well before the game reached its closing stretch. Against unranked Nebraska, the Hoosiers managed only six points until early in the fourth quarter, and the first-half numbers were among the poorest of Cignettis tenure, a jarring turn for a team that has otherwise spent much of the season building momentum.

Even with the attack stuck in neutral, Indianas defense kept the game within reach by holding Nebraska to 10 points through three quarters. That gave the Hoosiers a path back, and they eventually nudged ahead midway through the fourth, but the bigger question hanging over the night was harder to ignore: how much of the offensive mess belonged to execution, and how much pointed back to the coach making the decisions. [Read more 🡒]