Indianas New-Look Roster Is Already Fueling A Huge March Debate

With a mix of high expectations and cautious optimism, national rankings and computer models offer a wide array of opinions on Indiana University's basketball prospects for the 2026-27 season.

Indiana’s preseason range is wide, but the message is pretty consistent: the Hoosiers are being viewed as an NCAA Tournament team, just not yet as a true national heavyweight.

Across 11 projections from national writers, polls and computer models, IU lands anywhere from No. 24 to No. 47. That puts the Hoosiers squarely in the conversation, but well short of the elite tier.

The most bullish outlook comes from The Field of 68, which has Indiana at No. 24. Jeff Goodman and Rob Dauster were impressed by the portal work, noting that, “The Hoosiers were also big spenders this offseason, grabbing a transfer starting five of Markus Burton (Notre Dame), Bryce Lindsay (Villanova), Darren Harris (Duke), Aiden Sherrell (Alabama) and Samet Yigitoglu (SMU).”

Sports Illustrated follows close behind at No. 25, with Kevin Sweeney placing IU sixth in the Big Ten. His view centers on the frontcourt, especially after last season’s issues inside.

“The Hoosiers beefed up their front line after getting pummeled in the paint in Darian DeVries’s first season. Alabama transfer Aiden Sherrell headlines a loaded portal class that should help the Hoosiers get back to relevance.”

CBS Sports’ Gary Parrish has Indiana at No. 26 in his top-25-and-1, pointing to the return of Sam Alexis and Trent Sisley and the additions around them. Parrish wrote that the ranking is based on Indiana returning “two of the top eight scorers - specifically Sam Alexis and Trent Sisley - from a team that finished 18-14 and missed the 2026 NCAA Tournament.” He added that the core will be joined by a group led by Markus Burton, Bryce Lindsay, Aiden Sherrell, Samet Yigitoglu, Darren Harris, Jaeden Mustaf, Justin Monden, and four-star prospects Vaugn Karvala, Prince-Alexander Moody and Trevor Manhertz.

Jon Rothstein has IU at No. 31 in his daily top-45, while Andy Katz slots the Hoosiers at No. 37 in Power 44. CBS Sports’ Matt Norlander also has Indiana at No. 37 in his top-100-and-1, and his breakdown is one of the more detailed reads on the roster.

He noted that Indiana was “one of the final bubble victims in the 68-team tournament era” and said the Hoosiers’ NCAA Tournament drought, with the last trip in 2023, should end in March of 2027. Norlander pointed to the money invested in the roster rebuild and highlighted the additions of Aiden Sherrell and Samet Yigitoglu in the frontcourt.

He also wrote that Indiana “made 60.3% of its 2s last season; I’d bank on DeVries keeping his team near that clip.”

Norlander also flagged the shooting question, saying Indiana needs “a shot in the arm” from beyond the arc. He said Markus Burton, Bryce Lindsay and Jaeden Mustaf are not “knock-down distance shooters,” but can create offense and avoid clogging the lane. His bottom line: with better defense and rotation management, Indiana should settle somewhere between fifth and eighth in the Big Ten, a league he expects to send at least 10 teams to the NCAA Tournament.

The final pieces of the national picture are a little less rosy, but not dramatically different. Indiana is unranked in both the Coaches Poll and the AP Top 25, though it did receive votes in each, which effectively places the Hoosiers at No. 33 and No. 36, respectively.

ESPN’s Jeff Borzello left IU out of his top-25 and the next five as well, and The Athletic’s C.J. Moore did not include the Hoosiers in his top-25.

The computer models land in a similar neighborhood. KenPom has Indiana at No.

47, Torvik has the Hoosiers at No. 26, and Evan Miya places them at No. 45.

So while the numbers vary, the broad shape of the projection is clear: Indiana looks like a team that should be in the mix for March, with the portal class doing the heavy lifting in most of these preseason evaluations.

In Other News...

Josh Hoover Is Already Earning Indianas Locker Room Respect

Josh Hoover has already started to win over the Indiana locker room the hard way. Through a season that has asked plenty of him, the quarterback has kept playing through injuries in multiple games, including against Ohio State and Michigan, and that willingness to stay on the field has not gone unnoticed by teammates. Center Bray Lynch and others have made clear that Hoovers toughness and steady presence have helped set the tone around the offense.

For a team trying to build trust and consistency in a demanding stretch, that kind of buy-in matters almost as much as the throws and reads themselves. Hoovers value has been about more than production, with his teammates seeing a player who keeps competing under pressure and refusing to back away when things get difficult. The next question is how far that edge can carry Indiana as the season keeps tightening around it. [Read more 🡒]

Indiana Win Exposed One Hoosiers Question Fans Can't Ignore

Indianas overtime win over Michigan gave the Hoosiers plenty to celebrate, but it also did what close games often do: it sharpened the questions. There was enough individual production to go around, from defensive end Tobi Osunsanmis disruptive night with two sacks and two tackles for loss to quarterback Josh Hoover doing just enough to help Indiana escape with the win, even if the passing game never really found a steady rhythm.

Brock Schott and Jacob Savage both had moments that suggested real value going forward, while Davion Chandlers usage seems to be sliding in the other direction. For a team trying to sort out its identity, that mix is what makes the film worth watching after a victory, because the headline result was clear even if the rotation questions underneath it were not. [Read more 🡒]

Indiana Faces A Dangerous Letdown Spot After Michigan Escape

Indiana walked away from its overtime escape against Michigan with plenty to feel good about, but the calendar hardly gives the Hoosiers much time to exhale. Curt Cignettis team now turns to Minnesota, a matchup that comes with the kind of danger every good season eventually brings: a letdown spot after an emotional win. Both programs have already shown they can handle pressure, and this one arrives with a little more weight because Minnesota has its own rsum of notable victories, including wins over ranked opponents such as Iowa.

The Gophers have drawn respect from both sidelines, with the coaches acknowledging the strengths each team brings into this meeting and the challenge that still sits ahead on the schedule. For Indiana, the task is simple in theory and tricky in practice: carry the energy from the Michigan game without letting it spill into fatigue or complacency. For a team trying to keep its momentum rolling, this is the kind of test that can tell you whether a breakthrough win becomes a turning point or just a memory. [Read more 🡒]