Indianas 3-0 Start Is Hiding A Defensive Problem

IU basketball faces a defensive conundrum despite an undefeated start to the regular season, as early exhibitions fail to translate into stifling regular season statistics.

Indiana’s 3-0 start has come with a clear warning label: the defense that looked sharp in the exhibitions has not held up once the games started counting.

That’s the tension around IU basketball right now. The Hoosiers were solid enough in October, holding Butler to 0.88 points per possession, UNC to 0.78 and Western Kentucky to 0.96 across three exhibition games.

But in the regular season, the numbers have slipped. Indiana gave up 0.81 points per possession to Eastern Illinois in the opener, though that wasn’t especially encouraging with the Panthers shooting 61.1 percent on 2s.

Since then, the Hoosiers have allowed more than a point per possession in back-to-back games.

There are still positives in the profile, and the clearest one is on the defensive glass. Indiana has done a strong job finishing possessions, both in the exhibitions and the first three regular-season games.

Through all six games, no opponent has grabbed more than 25 percent of its missed shots. That’s a major step forward from the 2025-26 season, when IU ranked 123rd nationally in defensive rebounding percentage.

Right now, the Hoosiers sit 31st in that category. The work on the glass, along with IU’s emphasis on offensive rebounding, has helped Indiana win the second-chance points battle in every game so far.

The trouble is happening closer to the rim. Indiana brought in Aiden Sherrell and Samet Yigitoglu, and also got the unexpected return of Sam Alexis, giving the staff the size to battle in the Big Ten.

So far, though, the protection hasn’t matched the personnel. As of Wednesday morning, IU ranked 257th nationally in block percentage and 270th in 2-point field-goal percentage defense.

Opponents are shooting 73 percent at the rim. After Eastern Illinois hit 61.1 percent of its 2s, Bellarmine shot 55.9 percent on 2s and Syracuse shot 55.6 percent on 2s.

Last season, the Division I average for 2-point field-goal percentage was 51.7. Three games into this season, Indiana’s opponents are making 57.5 percent of their 2s.

Darian DeVries didn’t dance around the issues in his Wednesday media availability. He pointed first to the ball and the need for more resistance there.

Indiana, he said, has to improve its “physicality on the ball and staying in front of the ball.”

He also said the ball screen coverage “just hasn’t been what we need it to be right now.”

“Some of that’s just the connectivity as an entire defense,” he said. “It’s not always just the guy on the ball, but the drop coverage, some of the switching, those types of things. And then our backside just getting a little spread out at times.”

That showed up late in Monday’s win over Syracuse, when freshman guard Ryan Moesch kept making plays off the dribble out of ball screens. DeVries said that stretch stood out to him.

“In the second half of this Syracuse game, I thought our ball screen coverage wasn’t nearly what we needed it to be and wanted it to be,” DeVries said.

Indiana has also been able to force turnovers at a decent clip. KenPom.com lists the Hoosiers at 22.1 percent in opponent turnover percentage, which is above average nationally.

But that number comes with a catch: at times, IU has been too eager to hunt steals and deflections instead of staying locked in defensively. When those chances miss, the result can be straight-line drives and scrambling rotations.

“We’re getting some, and that’s a good thing,” DeVries explained. “We’ve been a little bit all or nothing on some of that. We’re getting some steals and deflections here and there.

“But we’re also giving up some straight-line drives at times. So it’s finding that balance of, like, hey, here’s where we can be aggressive and be able to create those turnovers and advantages.”

In Other News...

Indiana Gets One Encouraging Sign Before Must Win USC Matchup

Indiana at least got one bit of positive injury news heading into a must-win matchup with USC, with quarterback Josh Hoover expected to be available after being left off the initial injury report. Coach Curt Cignetti still has not named a starter, but he said Hoover will be in uniform if he stays clear of the report, giving the Hoosiers some stability at the most important position as they try to keep their season on track.

The rest of the availability picture is less reassuring. Leading rusher Turbo Richard and defensive end Kellan Wyatt have already been ruled out, while cornerback A.J. Harris and linebacker Rolijah Hardy are listed as questionable, leaving Indiana with several key spots still unsettled. Even with Hoover trending in the right direction, the Hoosiers are heading into a game where every healthy body matters, and the final lineup could shape how much room they have to compete with USC. [Read more 🡒]

Indianas Quarterback Uncertainty Just Got Bigger Before USC

Indianas quarterback situation got a little murkier this week as Curt Cignetti sorted through a room already under scrutiny ahead of USC. Grant Wilson missed practice because of the flu, while Josh Hoover was held out for injury recovery, leaving the Hoosiers to lean more heavily on backup Jacob Bell, who drew praise from Cignetti for the way he handled his work on the field.

The timing is less than ideal with USC looming, especially with Cignetti already pointing to the Trojans offense and defense as a major test. Indiana also has some cleanup to do in other areas, including special teams, which adds another layer to a week that was already going to be about finding answers before kickoff. [Read more 🡒]

Urban Meyer Just Reignited Indianas CFP Respect Debate

Indianas place in the College Football Playoff conversation took another public hit this week when Urban Meyer weighed in on the rankings, and the former coach did not exactly defend the Hoosiers standing. On FOX, Meyer pointed out that Indiana slid from No. 4 to No. 9 even without playing in Week 10, using the drop as evidence that the committee may have overvalued the Hoosiers early on.

The larger debate around Indiana has only grown louder as Notre Dame and UCLA moved up in the rankings and the Big Ten and Big 12 continue to jockey for playoff representation. Meyers comments fed right into the skepticism around Indianas rsum, with unimpressive wins and a shaky strength of schedule becoming the central sticking points in how the Hoosiers are being judged. [Read more 🡒]