Indiana Let Ohio State Slip Away With Mistakes Fans Rarely See

Indiana's normally disciplined football team falters with costly errors, ending their impressive winning streak against Ohio State.

Indiana had every chance to keep its remarkable run alive, and in the biggest moments, the Hoosiers did what they almost never do: they gave one away.

No. 5 Indiana fell 19-15 to No.

4 Ohio State on Saturday in what was described as arguably the biggest home sporting event in Indiana University’s history. A program built on being smart, disciplined and poised finally looked vulnerable at the wrong time, and the Buckeyes made the Hoosiers pay for it.

That’s what made this loss sting. Indiana came in with a reputation for clean football under Curt Cignetti, and the numbers backed it up.

The Hoosiers had only one turnover on the season and just 24 penalties through six games, an average of four per game. But against Ohio State, the script flipped.

The first real crack came late in the first half. Indiana had driven 66 yards and reached field-goal range with a 7-3 lead in hand.

Nico Radicic, who has been almost automatic during his time in Bloomington, lined up for a chance to push the lead to seven. Instead, the junior’s 32-yard try hit the left upright.

From there, Ohio State seized control of the half, marching 80 yards on 15 plays and draining the clock before taking a 10-7 lead into halftime on a 2-yard Bo Jackson touchdown catch.

Indiana had a chance to reset coming out of the break. Instead, the third quarter turned into the kind of sequence the Hoosiers usually force on their opponents.

Davion Chandler fumbled after a 19-yard catch to give Ohio State the ball in plus territory. On the next Indiana series, Josh Hoover was hit from the blind side on a fourth-and-short and coughed it up again.

Cignetti pointed directly to those turnovers after the game.

“Offense came out in the third quarter, turned it over the first two series,” Cignetti said. “A critical moment in that game.”

Then came another missed opportunity. Later in the third quarter, Indiana sent Radicic out for a 55-yard try, and the kick never had a chance, falling well short. It was another momentum swing Ohio State didn’t waste.

Even after that, Indiana still had a shot to steal it.

In the fourth quarter, Hoover led a scoring drive and found Nick Marsh for a 19-yard touchdown that trimmed the deficit to four. The defense kept bailing the offense out, even forcing an Ohio State punt to set up what could have been a game-winning possession.

Indiana moved the ball again, helped by catches from Charlie Becker and a roughing-the-passer penalty. But the final drive ended on a fourth-and-four at the Ohio State 27-yard line. Hoover looked for Marsh in the end zone along the sideline, and Marsh appeared to make the catch as the crowd erupted.

It didn’t count. Marsh’s foot was out of bounds, just enough for the pass to be ruled incomplete and send Ohio State home with the win.

Afterward, Cignetti summed up the night bluntly.

“Had so many opportunities to get it done, not only at the end of the game, but throughout the game,” Cignetti said. “Just too many missed opportunities on offense; I thought our defense really played well.”

For Indiana, the result was more than just a loss. The 22-game winning streak is gone.

So is the 19-game home winning streak. And Cignetti’s record drops to 33-3.

After 666 days without a defeat, Indiana finally found one. Now the focus shifts to Michigan.

In Other News...

Indiana Showed Enough Against Ohio State To Fuel A Bigger Debate

Indianas unbeaten run ended in Bloomington, but the way the Hoosiers handled Ohio State left plenty more to chew on than the final score. In a 19-15 loss, Indiana stayed in the fight from start to finish and gave the Buckeyes enough problems to make the game feel far closer than the records suggested, even if the margin never quite turned in its favor.

The late failure to convert on fourth down loomed over everything after the final whistle, the kind of moment that turns a strong showing into a what-if discussion. Charlie Beckers 9 catches for 165 yards kept Indiana moving, while Jeremiah Smith finished with 4 receptions for 68 yards and a touchdown, and the Hoosiers now head into the aftermath with one loss and a much bigger conversation about how close they are to the sports elite. [Read more 🡒]

Cignetti Reveals What Cost Indiana In Painful Ohio State Loss

Curt Cignetti left the postgame podium sounding equal parts frustrated and encouraged after Indianas 19-15 loss to Ohio State, a game in which the Hoosiers had enough defensive resistance to stay in it but could not cash in on the offensive chances that came their way. He pointed to missed opportunities as the difference, with third-quarter turnovers helping swing the flow of the night, even as the defense kept finding ways to make life difficult for the Buckeyes.

Ferrells interceptions were among the standout moments Cignetti mentioned, part of a defensive effort that gave Indiana a chance deep into the game. The next step, he said, is turning a painful finish into a lesson and moving on quickly to Michigan, where the Hoosiers will need a cleaner performance if they want the result to go the other way. [Read more 🡒]

Indiana Fans Have One Big AP Poll Debate After Costly Loss

Indianas setback on Oct. 18 came in a wild day around the AP Top 25, one that saw five teams inside the top seven go down, including Notre Dame, Georgia, Alabama and Texas. For Hoosier fans, the immediate concern is less about the national chaos and more about where Indiana lands when the next poll comes out, especially with the rankings likely to get a major shakeup after a Saturday that turned the top of the bracket upside down.

The ripple effects could reach well beyond Bloomington, with other movers such as BYU, Oregon and Oklahoma State also in the mix depending on how the voters sort out the weekends results. Indianas own drop is the obvious subplot, but the broader debate is whether the committee-style scramble around the AP voters leaves the Hoosiers punished more for one costly loss than for what happened everywhere else around them. [Read more 🡒]