Indiana spent Saturday chasing Ohio State all the way to the edge of another wild finish, but this time the Hoosiers stopped just short.
The gap between nearly and actually matters, and Curt Cignetti made that clear after Indiana’s heartbreaking loss. His team had another late push in it, another fourth-quarter rally that forced the Buckeyes to sweat, but the mistakes piled up enough to keep the winning streak from reaching 23 games.
“Tough one not to win; I thought our kids gave great effort and fight,” Cignetti said postgame. “We gave ourselves a chance to win.”
That chance came despite missed field goals, penalties, inaccurate throws and a handful of offensive opportunities that slipped away. Indiana kept finding ways to stay alive, but against Ohio State, staying alive is not the same as finishing the job.
“We weren't good enough today to seize it,” Cignetti said. “It was right there for the taking.”
Josh Hoover’s day fit that same theme. His final line was uneven, as he completed just 50% of his passes, and the performance swung between errant throws and a few plays that showed what Indiana was still trying to squeeze out of the passing game.
“When you play quarterback, it's all about getting the ball to the open guy, on time, accurately,” Cignetti said. “Certainly had a couple of misfires, but [Hoover] had some nice plays too.”
For most of the first three quarters, Hoover never really settled in. Then, in the fourth, he helped spark the comeback attempt. On Indiana’s final offensive possession, he found Nick Marsh on a throw that nearly became the game-winner, only for the pass to carry Marsh just out of bounds.
That was the story of the day for Indiana’s offense: close enough to matter, not quite clean enough to count.
“We had a lot of opportunity we didn't cash in on,” Cignetti said, “particularly in the second half.”
The other major test on Saturday was Ohio State receiver Jeremiah Smith, and Indiana’s secondary handled it better than many might have expected. Smith finished with four catches for 68 yards and a touchdown, well below his season averages before the game.
“They didn't target him much early in the game,” Cignetti said. “Almost like early in the game he was sort of a decoy.”
That showed up on Ohio State’s touchdown late in the first half, when Smith drew three Indiana defenders before the Buckeyes worked the ball to a running back for the score.
Smith did eventually land a big blow with a 38-yard touchdown reception, but even that play came with a strange twist. The pass was underthrown into the wind, and Indiana cornerback Jamari Sharpe misjudged it.
“We had great coverage,” Cignetti said. “Underthrown into the wind, just misjudged the ball.”
Still, the broader picture on Smith was encouraging for Indiana. He never completely took over, and the Hoosiers spent much of the afternoon keeping one of the country’s most dangerous receivers from dictating the game.
And just as it did last week against Nebraska, Indiana found itself staring at a multiple-score deficit in the fourth quarter. Just as it did last week, it made things interesting again.
“I thought we did a nice job of regrouping, kind of similar to last week,” Cignetti said. “Defense just wouldn't give in.”
That defensive resistance mattered because Indiana’s offense was fighting uphill for most of the day. The Hoosiers’ ability to keep chipping away gave Hoover and company a chance to make it a one-possession game, but the comeback required too much perfection in the end.
Indiana’s defense kept it close. The offense kept reaching for the opening. But the Hoosiers simply ran out of room before they could grab it.
In Other News...
Indiana Showed Enough Against Ohio State To Fuel A Bigger Debate
Indianas unbeaten run ended in Bloomington, but the way the Hoosiers handled Ohio State left plenty more to chew on than the final score. In a 19-15 loss, Indiana stayed in the fight from start to finish and gave the Buckeyes enough problems to make the game feel far closer than the records suggested, even if the margin never quite turned in its favor.
The late failure to convert on fourth down loomed over everything after the final whistle, the kind of moment that turns a strong showing into a what-if discussion. Charlie Beckers 9 catches for 165 yards kept Indiana moving, while Jeremiah Smith finished with 4 receptions for 68 yards and a touchdown, and the Hoosiers now head into the aftermath with one loss and a much bigger conversation about how close they are to the sports elite. [Read more 🡒]
Cignetti Reveals What Cost Indiana In Painful Ohio State Loss
Curt Cignetti left the postgame podium sounding equal parts frustrated and encouraged after Indianas 19-15 loss to Ohio State, a game in which the Hoosiers had enough defensive resistance to stay in it but could not cash in on the offensive chances that came their way. He pointed to missed opportunities as the difference, with third-quarter turnovers helping swing the flow of the night, even as the defense kept finding ways to make life difficult for the Buckeyes.
Ferrells interceptions were among the standout moments Cignetti mentioned, part of a defensive effort that gave Indiana a chance deep into the game. The next step, he said, is turning a painful finish into a lesson and moving on quickly to Michigan, where the Hoosiers will need a cleaner performance if they want the result to go the other way. [Read more 🡒]
Indiana Fans Have One Big AP Poll Debate After Costly Loss
Indianas setback on Oct. 18 came in a wild day around the AP Top 25, one that saw five teams inside the top seven go down, including Notre Dame, Georgia, Alabama and Texas. For Hoosier fans, the immediate concern is less about the national chaos and more about where Indiana lands when the next poll comes out, especially with the rankings likely to get a major shakeup after a Saturday that turned the top of the bracket upside down.
The ripple effects could reach well beyond Bloomington, with other movers such as BYU, Oregon and Oklahoma State also in the mix depending on how the voters sort out the weekends results. Indianas own drop is the obvious subplot, but the broader debate is whether the committee-style scramble around the AP voters leaves the Hoosiers punished more for one costly loss than for what happened everywhere else around them. [Read more 🡒]