As March Madness kicks into high gear, Indiana men’s basketball is once again on the outside looking in, missing the Sweet 16 for yet another year. The last time the Hoosiers reached this stage was back in the 2015-16 season under Tom Crean.
For a program with Indiana's history and support, this dry spell is tough to swallow. While teams like Alabama, Tennessee, and Gonzaga are becoming regulars in the Sweet 16, Indiana’s absence is a glaring reminder of its struggles.
So, how did Indiana find itself in this position? The short answer is that the team hasn't been performing at the level it needs to. But the full story is a bit more complex.
Tom Crean Era
Tom Crean was the last coach to lead Indiana to the Sweet 16, achieving this three times. The 2016-17 season showed promise, reaching No. 3 in the AP Poll, but injuries, like OG Anunoby's, derailed their potential.
Despite postseason successes, Crean faced criticism for his recruiting, particularly his inability to consistently secure top local talent. This, more than on-court performance, led to his departure in 2017.
Archie Miller's Tenure
Archie Miller arrived with high expectations after a successful stint at Dayton. Fans were eager for a defensive revival, and Miller’s system initially showed promise.
He also made waves by recruiting Romeo Langford, part of a top-10 class. However, the anticipated success never materialized.
While COVID-19 canceled what could have been his lone NCAA Tournament appearance, Miller’s inability to beat Purdue and sustain momentum led to his exit after the 2020-21 season.
Mike Woodson's Leadership
Mike Woodson, an NBA veteran, took over with support from experienced college figures like Dane Fife and Thad Matta. His NBA background helped attract top-tier talent, including Mackenzie Mgbako and Jalen Hood-Schifino.
Woodson brought Indiana back to the NCAA Tournament, but internal tensions and late-season slumps marred his tenure. After consecutive disappointing finishes, Woodson announced his retirement.
Darian DeVries' Challenge
Darian DeVries stepped in, aiming to address past weaknesses, particularly Indiana's 3-point shooting struggles. However, his first year highlighted ongoing issues with roster balance and consistency. To avoid repeating history, DeVries will need a standout recruiting class, potentially surpassing Woodson's efforts, to steer Indiana back to prominence.
The path forward for Indiana is clear: rebuild strategically and leverage its rich history to attract and develop top talent. The Hoosiers have the resources and fan base to reclaim their place among college basketball's elite, but it will require savvy leadership and a cohesive vision.