When it comes to NFL free agency, strategies vary as much as the teams themselves. Jason Fitzgerald’s analysis at Over the Cap sheds light on how different franchises approach the market, focusing on two main strategies: volume of signings and the financial weight of those contracts.
The Green Bay Packers and Los Angeles Rams are prime examples of teams that prefer quality over quantity. Both teams rank low in the number of free agents signed but high in average per year (APY) salaries.
The Packers, for instance, have made just nine signings over six seasons, yet their APY ranks near the top of the league. This approach indicates a preference for investing heavily in a select few, rather than spreading resources across many players.
On the flip side, the Houston Texans have taken a completely different route. With 59 players signed to contracts worth at least $2 million annually over the same period, they lead the league in volume.
However, their APY ranks 31st, suggesting a strategy focused on short-term, cost-effective deals. The Texans have leaned heavily on one-year contracts, leading the NFL with 33 such deals.
This approach has allowed them flexibility but hasn't been a hallmark of teams with sustained success. It will be intriguing to see if the Texans pivot from this strategy as they continue to develop under the leadership of CJ Stroud.
The Dallas Cowboys present another unique case. They rank eighth in the fewest qualifying free agent signings and dead last in APY. Unlike the Packers, who make big swings when they do engage in free agency, the Cowboys opt for a conservative approach both in volume and financial commitment.
Each team’s strategy reflects its priorities and risk tolerance, providing fans with a fascinating look at the diverse ways franchises build their rosters. Whether these approaches will lead to long-term success remains to be seen, but they certainly make for compelling off-season narratives.