Packers May Need A Backfield Move Before This Gets Worse

The Green Bay Packers are considering a bold move to revitalize their struggling offense mid-season by cutting ties with Josh Jacobs and seeking new backfield talent.

The Green Bay Packers’ 2026 season has opened in rough shape, and the noise around Josh Jacobs is only making it harder to see a clear path forward. Jordan Love’s slow start and the offense’s lack of balance have already put the team in a bind, but Jacobs’ ongoing legal situation has left Green Bay stuck in limbo. He remains on the commissioner’s exempt list, and any possible return is still purely hypothetical.

That uncertainty has left the Packers offense looking unfinished. Green Bay can’t fully move on, but it also can’t count on Jacobs to provide the balance the unit needs. The result is an offense that feels frozen in place, with the franchise waiting on an answer that may never come.

At this point, the cleanest move is to stop waiting and make a change. The Packers need at least one meaningful addition to the backfield because the current options are not meeting expectations. If Green Bay wants a real chance to steady the season, it has to act like a team in need of a reset.

There are possible trade targets to watch over the next month, including Tyler Allgeier and Alvin Kamar. However the Packers choose to address the position, the larger point is the same: they need to move on from Jacobs and end the suspense.

Keeping him in the background only adds to the feeling that this offense will never fully take the next step. Cutting ties would give Green Bay a chance to build a more complete attack without the constant question of whether Jacobs might eventually return.

The financial piece makes that decision easier. Releasing Jacobs would come with a $3.1 million dead cap hit and would still leave the Packers with room to make a move before this year’s trade deadline. That kind of flexibility matters, especially with the team already in desperation mode.

Even before this rough start, it was fair to argue that turning the page was the right call. Now it looks even more obvious. The Packers need to clear away the uncertainty, stop hoping for a return that appears unlikely, and find a backfield answer that actually fits the offense they’re trying to build.

In Other News...

Packers Add Depth Before Buccaneers Test But One Question Lingers

The Packers continued building out their depth chart before their Week 4 trip to face the Buccaneers, adding wide receiver Coleman Owen and defensive tackle David Blay to the practice squad. Its the kind of move teams make this time of year when injuries, special teams roles and weekly matchup planning can quickly push players from the back end of the roster into more meaningful work.

Owen enters his second NFL season after appearing in two games with the Colts last year, while Blay has already had stops with the Patriots and Eagles this offseason. Both are now officially on Green Bays practice squad, giving the team some added flexibility as it prepares for a tough test in Tampa Bay and leaving open the question of which of these fresh additions might matter first if the Packers need help in a hurry. [Read more 🡒]

Packers Are Still Paying For One Costly Offensive Line Miss

The Packers are still feeling the ripple effects of a 2021 draft decision that looked sensible at the time but has aged badly. Green Bay chose Josh Myers over Creed Humphrey, and while Myers was a steady enough presence for stretches, Humphrey quickly became one of the leagues best centers in Kansas City, stacking up Pro Bowl and All-Pro recognition while the Packers kept trying to stabilize the middle of their line.

Myers is gone now, having left after the 2024 season for the Jets, but the move only shifted the problem rather than solving it. Green Bay has since moved Elgton Jenkins to center and brought in Aaron Banks, yet injuries have complicated that plan and left the Packers still searching for the kind of offensive line continuity they never got from the original call at center. [Read more 🡒]

Packers Run Game Concerns Just Sparked A Veteran Back Debate

The early-season issues in the Packers running game have already pushed the front office to make moves up front, with Green Bay signing three veteran offensive linemen in search of more stability. But the ripple effect has naturally led to a broader conversation about whether the backfield itself could use a jolt, especially as the team tries to find a more reliable rhythm on the ground.

Antonio Gibson, who was recently released by the New England Patriots, has surfaced as a possible free-agent fit in analyst chatter, even though there has been no official indication the Packers are pursuing him. Green Bays current running back room is under the microscope as the team weighs its options, and Gibsons career track record and injury history add another layer to a debate that is still more speculation than substance. [Read more 🡒]