Keisean Nixon has never been the easiest player to sort out for Packers fans. Plenty of people have been hard on him as Green Bay’s top cornerback, and the opinions around him tend to come in loud and fast.
But one thing is undeniable: he delivered one of the defining moments of the Packers’ 2025 season, and it came in the middle of the fiercest kind of setting - a Bears game with everything hanging in the balance.
By the time Green Bay and Chicago met in Week 14, both teams were rolling. The Packers came in at 8-3-1, winners of three straight, fresh off a Thanksgiving win over the Lions in front of a national TV audience. Jordan Love was hot, Josh Jacobs was banged up but still producing, and Micah Parsons was at the height of his Packers run.
Chicago wasn’t exactly limping in either. The Bears were 9-3 and riding a five-game winning streak after stumbling out of the gate at 0-2. The matchup had the feel of a classic before kickoff, and it played like one once the game got going.
The first quarter ended scoreless, but after that the two teams spent most of the night trading blows. Green Bay kept finding a way to edge in front, and Chicago kept answering.
The Packers finally pushed ahead 28-21 after a long, gritty fourth-quarter drive that featured one of Josh Jacobs’ best runs of the season. Even then, the Bears still had more than three minutes left and a real shot to force a tie.
Then came the drive that nearly flipped everything.
Caleb Williams and the Bears started at their own 26 and immediately struck for 27 yards to Luther Burden on the first play. Two snaps later, Chicago hit another 24-yard completion to reach the Packers’ 23. Kyle Monangai then churned out two runs that set up 3rd and 1 at the Green Bay 14.
The Packers stopped Monangai on his third try, and suddenly it was all on fourth down.
With 27 seconds left, Chicago used a timeout to draw up the call. Green Bay answered with one of its own after seeing the alignment, and the stage was set for the game’s biggest snap.
The Bears loaded up motion to the right, then Williams booted left, giving himself options near the sideline. Green Bay’s defense flowed toward the flat to protect against the short throw, and that left tight end Cole Kmet nearly free in the end zone.
Almost free.
Nixon, lined up on the opposite side, noticed Kmet slipping deep and trailed him across the formation. When Williams finally saw Kmet and lofted what looked like a tying touchdown, Nixon went up and picked it off.
He wasn’t even supposed to be on that man. Nixon said after the game that he was originally responsible for D.J.
Moore, who ran a short route across the line of scrimmage. But once he saw Kmet uncovered, he broke off and chased the play.
“It wasn’t my man and my guy went behind the line of scrimmage,” Nixon said postgame. “I was chasing, and I just saw somebody go free.
I just chased him. Wasn’t even my man.”
The assignment, according to Evan Williams, belonged to him. He said he made an “instinct” play to the flat, which left Kmet open. Defensive coordinator Jeff Hafley didn’t sugarcoat it.
“Evan should have stayed on his man. That man would have been covered, and the ball would have never gone over there,” Hafley said. “He would have either been pulled up or had to outrun [Edgerrin] Cooper for the first down.”
Whatever the design was, Nixon finished the play. Green Bay ran out the clock and moved to 9-3-1.
It was the kind of moment that feels enormous in real time, especially in a rivalry game like this one. And for the Packers, it may have been the last pure high of the season.
The next week, everything started to unravel in Denver. A week after that came the overtime loss to the Bears, a result that felt less like a defeat than giving the game away.
One week later, with Jordan Love out after a concussion early in that second Bears meeting, the Packers were handled by the Ravens, then finished the season with their JV squad losing to the Vikings.
The Wildcard Round brought its own ending, and in hindsight there was something almost fitting about it: Nixon had helped crush Chicago’s comeback in Week 14, then later played a key role in the Packers’ late-game collapse in the playoffs.
Still, none of that erases the play itself. Nixon’s interception was sharp, instinctive, and huge. It stands as the top play of the Packers’ 2025 season, and it’s the kind of image that sticks long after the rest of the year fades.
In Other News...
Packers Suddenly Have A Real Chance To Chase Maxx Crosby
The Packers are heading toward the 2026 season with a pass rush that still feels unfinished, even after the big swing for Micah Parsons. With Parsons expected to miss the first half of the year as Green Bay eases him back from injury, Lukas Van Ness is likely to be one of the main edge options when the season opens, which puts added pressure on the front office to keep looking for help.
That is why Maxx Crosby has suddenly become a name to watch again. The Raiders star was already the sort of player who would change the look of a defense, and now Green Bay has a real chance to enter the conversation if it decides the price is worth it. The question is whether the Packers would be willing to spend the draft capital needed after already making such a major investment in Parsons, or whether they will trust their current plan and let the market sort itself out. [Read more 🡒]
Packers Fans Know Exactly Who Truly Owned No. 5
The Packers No. 5 has a long, old-school history, with several early Green Bay standouts and Hall of Famers having passed through it before the modern era ever got started. But the numbers place in franchise lore really comes into focus when you look at the player who turned it into something bigger than a jersey, a versatile scoring force who helped define one of the NFLs great dynasties.
He was at his peak in the early 1960s, when he piled up points, earned league MVP honors in 1961 and helped Green Bay win four NFL titles. Vince Lombardi later treated No. 5 as if it were off-limits, even if the Packers never made that retirement official, and only a handful of players have worn it since. [Read more 🡒]