Kristaps Porzingis has become one of the Warriors’ biggest early-season mysteries, and the latest wrinkle is a strange one: Golden State may have an avenue to challenge his contract if his absence keeps stretching on.
Porzingis signed a two-year, $40 million extension over the offseason after the Warriors acquired him from the Atlanta Hawks at last season’s trade deadline, but he has yet to play for Golden State this season. The team has been trying to sort out how to get value from that deal while he remains unavailable.
His absence traces back to a private health issue that kept him out of training camp and has prevented him from suiting up. That issue appears to be tied to an upper respiratory viral illness he contracted during his time with the Boston Celtics. The situation has also intersected with Porzingis’ well-known battle with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), though the source material notes the Warriors believed they could eventually get him on the floor.
“Although Porzingis' injury troubles and his battle with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) were well known throughout the organization, the Warriors believed they could find a way to get the Latvian big man on the floor. For a period of time, this was true, and Porzingis looked like a significant contributor at the end of the 2025-26 season…having Porzingis sidelined means that the Warriors have roughly $90 million out right now, or for those who like percentages, about 40% of their total team payroll.”
ESPN’s Anthony Slater reported that the Warriors’ thinking may now be shifting in a more aggressive direction. After an early-October front-office meeting, the team tried to calm any concern around Porzingis.
“After a meeting with Celebrini and Dunleavy in early October, the team sent out a statement declaring he would be around. It didn’t last.”
Slater also pointed to a notable change in how the organization is describing Porzingis’ status, calling it intentional.
“Porzingis hasn’t returned to the facility and the organization shifted his official status from out with ‘general illness’ (as they’d listed during his absences last season) to ‘not with team,’ a purposeful change. This can no longer be described as an excused absence for the center.”
That distinction could matter. According to Slater, the Warriors have internally discussed whether Porzingis’ absence could be treated as a failure to render his services, which could open the door to an attempt to void the contract.
“Porzingis’ unwillingness to be present at the Warriors’ facility could be deemed a failure to render his services - a reality that has been raised internally, sources said - and could be used in an attempt to void his entire contract.”
Even then, it would not be a clean or easy solution.
“But that would present its own complications, unless Porzingis expressed an intention to retire and willingly gave all the money back.”
In Other News...
Mavericks Just Got Linked To A Trade Idea Fans Will Debate
The Warriors search for help in the middle has been a constant subplot, and one speculative path that has surfaced would send Daniel Gafford from Dallas to the Bay in a package built around Moses Moody, Gui Santos and a 2028 first-round pick. It is the kind of idea that immediately invites debate because it speaks to two things Golden State has been chasing for a while: more size up front and a clearer answer at center without emptying the cupboard too aggressively.
From the Mavericks side, the appeal would come down to what Moody can become when healthy and available, since his injury status is part of the conversation, along with the kind of perimeter profile he brings. For the Warriors, the question is whether giving up a young wing, a developmental piece and a future first is worth the chance to solve a glaring roster need, especially with the deal still only living in the speculative stage. [Read more 🡒]
Jonathan Kuminga Is Reviving An Uncomfortable Warriors Debate
Jonathan Kumingas first season away from Golden State has done more than change his scenery. It has also sharpened the case for what kind of player he can be when the environment around him is built to highlight his strengths. Since moving on to the Hawks and then the Timberwolves, his offensive production has stayed fairly steady, but the defensive numbers around him have trended upward, and the broader picture has become harder for the Warriors to ignore.
Minnesota has given Kuminga a much different support system, one that includes strong rim protection and elite point-of-attack defense, and that context matters when evaluating his growth. It also feeds back into an old question Golden State never fully settled: whether Kuminga is best used as a wing, a forward, or in some role that asks less of him defensively and lets his athletic tools play up. The answer may not be simple, but his new stops have made the debate look a lot less theoretical. [Read more 🡒]
Warriors Fans Are Seeing Why Moving On From Looney Made Sense
Kevon Looneys early run with the Lakers has given former Warriors observers a familiar glimpse of what his value looks like in a very specific role. Los Angeles signed him to a veterans minimum deal to back up at center, betting on his experience, toughness and rebounding presence to stabilize the front end of the rotation while the rest of the frontcourt sorts itself out.
Instead, the opening stretch has been modest, with Looney averaging 7.3 minutes, 2.0 points and 2.0 rebounds per game. The larger concern is less about effort than fit, as his lack of speed and athleticism can make it hard for him to stay on the floor regularly, leaving the Lakers in a spot where they are still leaning on him as a short-term option even after exploring other frontcourt possibilities. [Read more 🡒]