Stephen Curry’s value to the Warriors has long gone beyond points, threes and trophies, and Rich Paul thinks the payoff should reflect that.
On the “ Game Over ” podcast, Paul argued that Curry deserves a much bigger kind of reward than a standard superstar contract. He said players who change a franchise’s financial picture should be treated more like top executives in corporate America, where stock and profit-sharing can be part of the package.
“You know, in Fortune 500 or Fortune 100 companies, and you are an executive at a specific level, you get stock and things like that, and that’s able to grow and compound over time… You [players] cannot invest in a team, but they do have a direct correlation to a team’s compounding in terms of value… All players aren’t created equal in this situation. But in someone like Steph’s case, he definitely moves the needle when it pertains to the value of an organization.”
Max Kellerman pushed back by pointing out that Curry’s reach lifts the NBA as a whole as much as it does Golden State, but Paul kept going. He said Curry’s value shows up in everything from his pre-game warm-up routine to the way he performs once the game starts.
“From his pre-game warm-up routine, which has value, all the way to his production, to his play on the floor night in and night out. And then, when you add on factors like his showmanship, his professionalism, and things of that nature, absolutely.”
Paul’s point was simple: if this were a business deal in the corporate world, Curry would not just get a salary. He would likely get a bonus, maybe a profit share, and stock options that vest over time.
“If this were corporate America, if they were putting together a package together for Steph Curry, he would get his salary, he would get a major bonus; in some cases, he might get a profit share, and he probably would get certain stock options that vest over time.”
He also brought up Steve Ballmer as an example of how ownership and wealth can work in a business setting, noting that the NBA’s richest owner built his fortune as Microsoft’s former CEO and used that stock to buy a franchise.
Paul then pushed back on the old idea that athletes should just be grateful for big paychecks and leave it at that. In his view, today’s players have more information, a better grasp of how business works, and a different mindset than previous generations.
“It’s unfortunate in terms of the idea that, ‘Oh, these guys make a lot of money anyway, so they shouldn’t complain or they shouldn’t care,’ and so on and so forth,” Paul added. “I’m not going to say they’re smarter now, because I would never call past eras not smart. I just think that there’s a lot more information available, and there’s a different understanding of how business actually works today, and so the athlete is starting to think differently.”
That broader shift has already been reflected in the way players approach their careers, with Magic Johnson cited as part of the template for modern athletes looking to maximize what they earn and own. In Curry’s case, the Warriors have already paid him handsomely, including a $136.7 million extension, but Paul suggested that still may not fully capture what he means to the franchise.
The numbers around Golden State tell the story. When Joe Lacob and Peter Gruber bought the team in 2010, the Warriors were worth about $450 million. Nearly 16 years later, the franchise is valued at roughly $10-$11 billion, and Curry’s rise is a major reason why.
Paul isn’t the first person to float the idea of Curry getting a piece of the team, either. Kevin Durant has also said the guard should receive an ownership stake. Whether that ever happens or not, the conversation keeps circling back to the same point: Curry has become far more than a star player, and plenty of people believe that should matter when it’s time to talk compensation.
In Other News...
Warriors Fans Will Hate Where This Latest Spurs Hype Went
Charles Barkley already has the basketball world talking again, this time with a comparison that will land hard in the Bay Area. After praising Spurs guards Stephon Castle and Dylan Harper, Barkley floated the idea that San Antonios young backcourt could grow into something reminiscent of Stephen Curry and Klay Thompson, a bar so high it practically comes with a warning label. The Spurs do have reasons to dream, with Victor Wembanyama anchoring a promising core and a pair of talented guards giving the franchise a new kind of upside.
For Warriors fans, the bigger issue is how casually those comparisons get made before anything has been earned. Curry and Thompson helped define an era, and matching even a slice of that success is a long way off for any young pair, no matter how much talent they show early. San Antonio also has its own roster questions to sort through as this core develops, and until those pieces settle, the new Steph and Klay talk feels more like a provocation than a prediction. [Read more 🡒]
Warriors Just Lost The Lakers Threat They Feared Most
LeBron James is no longer part of the Lakers regular-season picture, and for Golden State that changes the equation in a way that is hard to ignore. The Warriors had spent years dealing with a matchup problem unlike most others, because James consistently seemed to raise his level when these teams crossed paths and gave Golden State a very specific kind of trouble on both ends of the floor.
The Lakers have already shifted their attention toward Luka Doncic in the wake of James departure, but the immediate effect for the Warriors is simpler: one fewer proven problem to game-plan around. Even if Los Angeles still has enough talent to matter, the absence of James removes the player who has so often made that rivalry feel heavier, more physical and a little more personal for Golden State. [Read more 🡒]
Warriors May Have Avoided A Ben Simmons Role Problem
Ben Simmons latest stop came with a familiar wrinkle, as Sacramento officially signed him and listed him as a 6-foot-10 guard, keeping the conversation around his best NBA role alive. Rich Paul has suggested Simmons could be used more like a center in pick-and-roll looks, but the Kings current roster does not appear built to make that experiment easy, which makes the fit feel a little awkward before the season even gets going.
For the Warriors, the intrigue had looked a bit different. Golden State had shown interest in Simmons and could have tried to use him as a backup point guard or a versatile forward, the kind of Swiss Army piece that sometimes finds a lane in their system. Even then, he would have had to win a preseason roster spot over Brandon Williams, so the path was never going to be automatic, and the latest Sacramento move suggests the Warriors may have sidestepped a role puzzle before it reached their own locker room. [Read more 🡒]